74 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24962256)
1. Comparison of cytotechnologists' and cytopathologists' ASCUS rates preimplementation and postimplementation of the ThinPrep® imaging system.
Selvaggi SM
Diagn Cytopathol; 2015 Feb; 43(2):105-7. PubMed ID: 24962256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Increased rate of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance and declining high-risk human papillomavirus rates following implementation of ThinPrep Imaging System are associated with increased nuclear chromasia.
Ly A; Beck AH; Pai RK; Kong CS
J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2014; 3(2):73-78. PubMed ID: 31051704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Does total manual rescreening of negative pap tests screened by the ThinPrep imaging system add any value?
Martin EL; Michael CW; Bomeisl PE; Shyu S; Wasman JK
Diagn Cytopathol; 2014 Oct; 42(10):834-9. PubMed ID: 24554347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Implementation of the ThinPrep imaging system in a high-volume metropolitan laboratory.
Miller FS; Nagel LE; Kenny-Moynihan MB
Diagn Cytopathol; 2007 Apr; 35(4):213-7. PubMed ID: 17351933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assisted primary screening using the automated ThinPrep Imaging System.
Biscotti CV; Dawson AE; Dziura B; Galup L; Darragh T; Rahemtulla A; Wills-Frank L
Am J Clin Pathol; 2005 Feb; 123(2):281-7. PubMed ID: 15842055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Cellient automated cell block system is useful in the differential diagnosis of atypical glandular cells in Papanicolaou tests.
Xing W; Hou AY; Fischer A; Owens CL; Jiang Z
Cancer Cytopathol; 2014 Jan; 122(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 23963870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Correlation of cytotechnologists' parameters with their performance in rapid prescreening of papanicolaou smears.
Djemli A; Khetani K; Case BW; Auger M
Cancer; 2006 Oct; 108(5):306-10. PubMed ID: 16948125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Is there a role for the thinprep imaging system in reporting anal cytology?
Margaret Roberts J; Jin F; Ekman D; Kay Adams M; Lindsay McDonald R; Kathleen Thurloe J; Richards A; Mary Poynten I; Law C; Kincaid Fairley C; John Hillman R; Tabrizi SN; Marie Cornall A; James Templeton D; Marie Garland S; Edwin Grulich A; Farnsworth A
Diagn Cytopathol; 2016 May; 44(5):384-8. PubMed ID: 26876374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. HPV detection rate in discordant Pap tests between cytotechnologists and pathologists.
Chhieng DC; Bakdounes K; Connolly M; Gallaspy S; Roberson J; Eltoum I
Diagn Cytopathol; 2009 May; 37(5):320-3. PubMed ID: 19191288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The utility of pap cell block preparations with liqui-PREP™ cell pellets to clarify the cytological diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance and atypical glandular cells.
George NB; Baldassari JH; Pérez Taveras DA; José Fernández M; Concepción Robledo M
Diagn Cytopathol; 2017 Jun; 45(6):520-525. PubMed ID: 28342244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of the more restrictive definition of atypical squamous cells introduced by the 2001 Bethesda System on the sensitivity and specificity of the Papanicolaou test: a 5-year follow-up study of Papanicolaou tests originally interpreted as ASCUS, reclassified according to Bethesda 2001 criteria.
Thrall MJ; Pambuccian SE; Stelow EB; McKeon DM; Miller L; Savik K; Gulbahce HE
Cancer; 2008 Jun; 114(3):171-9. PubMed ID: 18454461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative study of the ThinPrep Pap test and conventional cytology results in a Canadian cohort.
Duggan MA; Khalil M; Brasher PM; Nation JG
Cytopathology; 2006 Apr; 17(2):73-81. PubMed ID: 16548991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Automated screening versus manual screening: a comparison of the ThinPrep imaging system and manual screening in a time study.
Schledermann D; Hyldebrandt T; Ejersbo D; Hoelund B
Diagn Cytopathol; 2007 Jun; 35(6):348-52. PubMed ID: 17497655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of p16INK4a as a diagnostic tool in the triage of Pap smears demonstrating atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.
Duncan L; Jacob S; Hubbard E
Cancer; 2008 Feb; 114(1):34-48. PubMed ID: 18186493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Introduction of the Thin Prep Imaging System (TIS): experience in a high volume academic practice.
Chivukula M; Saad RS; Elishaev E; White S; Mauser N; Dabbs DJ
Cytojournal; 2007 Feb; 4():6. PubMed ID: 17288596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cytotechnologist screening of fine-needle aspiration specimens: impact on turnaround time and diagnostic accuracy.
Layfield LJ; Esebua M; Witt BL
Diagn Cytopathol; 2014 Jul; 42(7):606-8. PubMed ID: 24554528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Utility of P16 expression and Ki-67 proliferation index in ASCUS and ASC-H pap tests.
Toll AD; Kelly D; Maleki Z
Diagn Cytopathol; 2014 Jul; 42(7):576-81. PubMed ID: 24288264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Maximizing the adequacy of Hologic(®) Cervista(®) HPV HR results on ThinPrep(®) Pap samples treated with glacial acetic acid.
Mahajan A; Kucher E; Hoefle W; Engelhardt S; Accola M; Barasch S; Rehrauer W; Selvaggi SM
Diagn Cytopathol; 2016 Mar; 44(3):215-9. PubMed ID: 26779984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cytohistologic correlation rates between conventional Papanicolaou smears and ThinPrep cervical cytology: a comparison.
Chacho MS; Mattie ME; Schwartz PE
Cancer; 2003 Jun; 99(3):135-40. PubMed ID: 12811853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intra- and inter-observer reproducibility of CINtec
McMenamin M; McKenna M; McDowell A; Dawson C; McKenna R
Cytopathology; 2017 Aug; 28(4):284-290. PubMed ID: 28685883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
