These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24962499)

  • 1. Feasibility of prediction of cesarean section scar dehiscence in the third trimester by three-dimensional ultrasound.
    Mansour GM; El-Mekkawi SF; Khairy HT; Mossad AE
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2015 May; 28(8):944-8. PubMed ID: 24962499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Laparoscopic and vaginal repair of uterine scar dehiscence following cesarean section as detected by ultrasound.
    Klemm P; Koehler C; Mangler M; Schneider U; Schneider A
    J Perinat Med; 2005; 33(4):324-31. PubMed ID: 16207118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prediction of uterine dehiscence using ultrasonographic parameters of cesarean section scar in the nonpregnant uterus: a prospective observational study.
    Pomorski M; Fuchs T; Zimmer M
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2014 Oct; 14():365. PubMed ID: 25733122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ultrasound evaluation of uterine scar after Cesarean section and next birth.
    Basic E; Basic-Cetkovic V; Kozaric H; Rama A
    Med Arch; 2012; 66(3 Suppl 1):41-4. PubMed ID: 22937691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Standardized approach for imaging and measuring Cesarean section scars using ultrasonography.
    Naji O; Abdallah Y; Bij De Vaate AJ; Smith A; Pexsters A; Stalder C; McIndoe A; Ghaem-Maghami S; Lees C; Brölmann HA; Huirne JA; Timmerman D; Bourne T
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Mar; 39(3):252-9. PubMed ID: 21858885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Deficient lower-segment Cesarean section scars: prevalence and risk factors.
    Ofili-Yebovi D; Ben-Nagi J; Sawyer E; Yazbek J; Lee C; Gonzalez J; Jurkovic D
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jan; 31(1):72-7. PubMed ID: 18061960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prediction of uterine dehiscence by measuring lower uterine segment thickness prior to the onset of labor: evaluation by transvaginal ultrasonography.
    Asakura H; Nakai A; Ishikawa G; Suzuki S; Araki T
    J Nippon Med Sch; 2000 Oct; 67(5):352-6. PubMed ID: 11031364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cesarean section scar measurements in non-pregnant women using three-dimensional ultrasound: a repeatability study.
    Glavind J; Madsen LD; Uldbjerg N; Dueholm M
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Jun; 201():65-9. PubMed ID: 27064944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Three-dimensional volume rendering ultrasound for assessing placenta accreta spectrum severity and discriminating it from simple scar dehiscence.
    Adu-Bredu TK; Ridwan R; Aditiawarman A; Ariani G; Collins SL; Aryananda RA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2024 Apr; 6(4):101321. PubMed ID: 38460827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Laparoscopic repair of wide and deep uterine scar dehiscence after cesarean section.
    Donnez O; Jadoul P; Squifflet J; Donnez J
    Fertil Steril; 2008 Apr; 89(4):974-80. PubMed ID: 17624346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sonographic Findings and Diagnostic Pitfalls in Evaluation for Uterine Rupture in a Case of Fetal Demise and Prior Cesarean Delivery of Unknown Type.
    Spain JA; Shaikh S; Sandberg SA
    Ultrasound Q; 2017 Mar; 33(1):69-73. PubMed ID: 28081020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Evaluation of the condition of the uterine scar after cesarean section by echography].
    Titchenko LI; Belousov MA; Zhilenko MI
    Akush Ginekol (Mosk); 1990 Nov; (11):69-70. PubMed ID: 2077921
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Uterine dehiscence in pregnant with previous caesarean delivery.
    Zhu Z; Li H; Zhang J
    Ann Med; 2021 Dec; 53(1):1265-1269. PubMed ID: 34309465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cesarean section scar defects: agreement between transvaginal sonographic findings with and without saline contrast enhancement.
    Osser OV; Jokubkiene L; Valentin L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Jan; 35(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 20034000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. When a cesarean section scar is more than an innocent bystander in a subsequent pregnancy: Ultrasound to the rescue.
    Singh D; Kaur L
    J Clin Ultrasound; 2017 Jul; 45(6):319-327. PubMed ID: 28440856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ultrasound Predictability of Lower Uterine Segment Cesarean Section Scar Thickness.
    Tazion S; Hafeez M; Manzoor R; Rana T
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2018 May; 28(5):361-364. PubMed ID: 29690964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. High prevalence of defects in Cesarean section scars at transvaginal ultrasound examination.
    Osser OV; Jokubkiene L; Valentin L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Jul; 34(1):90-7. PubMed ID: 19499514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sonographic evaluation of the lower uterine segment thickness in women with a single previous Cesarean section.
    Sanlorenzo O; Farina A; Pula G; Zanello M; Pedrazzi A; Martina T; Gabrielli S; Simonazzi G; Rizzo N
    Minerva Ginecol; 2013 Oct; 65(5):551-5. PubMed ID: 24096291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Can the final sonographic assessment of the cesarean section scar be predicted 6 weeks after the operation?
    Dosedla E; Calda P
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Oct; 55(5):718-720. PubMed ID: 27751422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Morphology of the cesarean section scar in the non-pregnant uterus after one elective cesarean section.
    Pomorski M; Fuchs T; Rosner-Tenerowicz A; Zimmer M
    Ginekol Pol; 2017; 88(4):174-179. PubMed ID: 28509317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.