These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24962946)

  • 1. The comparison between stroke volume variation and filling pressure as an estimate of right ventricular preload in patients undergoing renal transplantation.
    Toyoda D; Fukuda M; Iwasaki R; Terada T; Sato N; Ochiai R; Kotake Y
    J Anesth; 2015 Feb; 29(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 24962946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Stroke volume variation derived by arterial pulse contour analysis is a good indicator for preload estimation during liver transplantation.
    Su BC; Tsai YF; Cheng CW; Yu HP; Yang MW; Lee WC; Lin CC
    Transplant Proc; 2012 Mar; 44(2):429-32. PubMed ID: 22410035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Is stroke volume variation a useful preload index in liver transplant recipients? A retrospective analysis.
    Kim SH; Hwang GS; Kim SO; Kim YK
    Int J Med Sci; 2013; 10(6):751-7. PubMed ID: 23630440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparative study of pulse pressure variation, stroke volume variation and central venous pressure in patients undergoing kidney transplantation.
    Kim KM; Kim GS; Han M
    Singapore Med J; 2022 Dec; 63(12):731-739. PubMed ID: 34911180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Determining optimal cardiac preload during resuscitation using measurements of ventricular compliance.
    Kincaid EH; Meredith JW; Chang MC
    J Trauma; 2001 Apr; 50(4):665-9. PubMed ID: 11303161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Can stroke volume variation be an alternative to central venous pressure in patients undergoing kidney transplantation?
    Chin JH; Jun IG; Lee J; Seo H; Hwang GS; Kim YK
    Transplant Proc; 2014 Dec; 46(10):3363-6. PubMed ID: 25498052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pulse Oximeter-Derived Pleth Variability Index is a Reliable Indicator of Cardiac Preload in Patients Undergoing Liver Transplantation.
    Lee HC; Tsai YF; Tsai HI; Chung PC; Yu HP; Lee WC; Lin CC
    Transplant Proc; 2016 May; 48(4):1055-8. PubMed ID: 27320555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Stroke volume variation in hepatic resection: a replacement for standard central venous pressure monitoring.
    Dunki-Jacobs EM; Philips P; Scoggins CR; McMasters KM; Martin RC
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2014 Feb; 21(2):473-8. PubMed ID: 24150192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Stroke volume and pulse pressure variation for prediction of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.
    Hofer CK; Müller SM; Furrer L; Klaghofer R; Genoni M; Zollinger A
    Chest; 2005 Aug; 128(2):848-54. PubMed ID: 16100177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Global and right ventricular end-diastolic volumes correlate better with preload after correction for ejection fraction.
    Malbrain ML; De Potter TJ; Dits H; Reuter DA
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2010 May; 54(5):622-31. PubMed ID: 20085545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Central venous pressure as an adjunct to flow-guided volume optimisation after induction of general anaesthesia.
    Hahn RG; He R; Li Y
    Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther; 2016; 48(2):110-5. PubMed ID: 26499516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The ability of left ventricular end-diastolic volume variations measured by TEE to monitor fluid responsiveness in high-risk surgical patients during craniotomy: a prospective cohort study.
    Lan H; Zhou X; Xue J; Liu B; Chen G
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):165. PubMed ID: 29202703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Uncalibrated pulse contour-derived stroke volume variation predicts fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients undergoing liver transplantation.
    Biais M; Nouette-Gaulain K; Cottenceau V; Revel P; Sztark F
    Br J Anaesth; 2008 Dec; 101(6):761-8. PubMed ID: 18852114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pulmonary artery occlusion pressure and central venous pressure fail to predict ventricular filling volume, cardiac performance, or the response to volume infusion in normal subjects.
    Kumar A; Anel R; Bunnell E; Habet K; Zanotti S; Marshall S; Neumann A; Ali A; Cheang M; Kavinsky C; Parrillo JE
    Crit Care Med; 2004 Mar; 32(3):691-9. PubMed ID: 15090949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prediction of fluid responsiveness in infants and neonates undergoing congenital heart surgery.
    Renner J; Broch O; Duetschke P; Scheewe J; Höcker J; Moseby M; Jung O; Bein B
    Br J Anaesth; 2012 Jan; 108(1):108-15. PubMed ID: 22113930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Alternative methods to central venous pressure for assessing volume status in critically ill patients.
    Stoneking L; Deluca LA; Fiorello AB; Munzer B; Baker N; Denninghoff KR
    J Emerg Nurs; 2014 Mar; 40(2):115-23. PubMed ID: 23089635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prediction of volume-responsiveness during one-lung ventilation: a comparison of static, volumetric, and dynamic parameters of cardiac preload.
    Trepte CJ; Haas SA; Nitzschke R; Salzwedel C; Goetz AE; Reuter DA
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2013 Dec; 27(6):1094-100. PubMed ID: 23972740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [A prospective clinical study of pleth variability index in prediction of volume responsiveness in patients with septic shock].
    Lu N; Zheng R; Lin H; Yu J; Shao J; Wu X; Wang H
    Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2015 Jan; 27(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 25591431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dynamic and volumetric variables reliably predict fluid responsiveness in a porcine model with pleural effusion.
    Broch O; Gruenewald M; Renner J; Meybohm P; Schöttler J; Heß K; Steinfath M; Bein B
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(2):e56267. PubMed ID: 23418546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dynamic preload indicators fail to predict fluid responsiveness in open-chest conditions.
    de Waal EE; Rex S; Kruitwagen CL; Kalkman CJ; Buhre WF
    Crit Care Med; 2009 Feb; 37(2):510-5. PubMed ID: 19114886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.