These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

75 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24963011)

  • 1. Inference on differences between classes using cluster-specific contrasts of mixed effects.
    Ng SK; McLachlan GJ; Wang K; Nagymanyoki Z; Liu S; Ng SW
    Biostatistics; 2015 Jan; 16(1):98-112. PubMed ID: 24963011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of seven methods for producing Affymetrix expression scores based on False Discovery Rates in disease profiling data.
    Shedden K; Chen W; Kuick R; Ghosh D; Macdonald J; Cho KR; Giordano TJ; Gruber SB; Fearon ER; Taylor JM; Hanash S
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Feb; 6():26. PubMed ID: 15705192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of a statistical equivalence test applied to microarray data.
    Qiu J; Cui X
    J Biopharm Stat; 2010 Mar; 20(2):240-66. PubMed ID: 20309757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Determination of the differentially expressed genes in microarray experiments using local FDR.
    Aubert J; Bar-Hen A; Daudin JJ; Robin S
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2004 Sep; 5():125. PubMed ID: 15350197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A two-step multiple comparison procedure for a large number of tests and multiple treatments.
    Jiang H; Doerge RW
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2006; 5():Article28. PubMed ID: 17402912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A note on using permutation-based false discovery rate estimates to compare different analysis methods for microarray data.
    Xie Y; Pan W; Khodursky AB
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Dec; 21(23):4280-8. PubMed ID: 16188930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Construction of null statistics in permutation-based multiple testing for multi-factorial microarray experiments.
    Gao X
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Jun; 22(12):1486-94. PubMed ID: 16574697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Gene Ontology analysis in multiple gene clusters under multiple hypothesis testing framework.
    Zhong S; Xie D
    Artif Intell Med; 2007 Oct; 41(2):105-15. PubMed ID: 17913480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Nonparametric methods for microarray data based on exchangeability and borrowed power.
    Lee ML; Whitmore GA; Björkbacka H; Freeman MW
    J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(5):783-97. PubMed ID: 16078385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multidimensional local false discovery rate for microarray studies.
    Ploner A; Calza S; Gusnanto A; Pawitan Y
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Mar; 22(5):556-65. PubMed ID: 16368770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A mixture model with random-effects components for clustering correlated gene-expression profiles.
    Ng SK; McLachlan GJ; Wang K; Ben-Tovim Jones L; Ng SW
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Jul; 22(14):1745-52. PubMed ID: 16675467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Selection of differentially expressed genes in microarray data analysis.
    Chen JJ; Wang SJ; Tsai CA; Lin CJ
    Pharmacogenomics J; 2007 Jun; 7(3):212-20. PubMed ID: 16940966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Selecting "significant" differentially expressed genes from the combined perspective of the null and the alternative.
    Moerkerke B; Goetghebeur E
    J Comput Biol; 2006 Nov; 13(9):1513-31. PubMed ID: 17147475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A simple implementation of a normal mixture approach to differential gene expression in multiclass microarrays.
    McLachlan GJ; Bean RW; Jones LB
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Jul; 22(13):1608-15. PubMed ID: 16632494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cluster-based network model for time-course gene expression data.
    Inoue LY; Neira M; Nelson C; Gleave M; Etzioni R
    Biostatistics; 2007 Jul; 8(3):507-25. PubMed ID: 16980695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An investigation of two multivariate permutation methods for controlling the false discovery proportion.
    Korn EL; Li MC; McShane LM; Simon R
    Stat Med; 2007 Oct; 26(24):4428-40. PubMed ID: 17357994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Significance analysis of groups of genes in expression profiling studies.
    Chen JJ; Lee T; Delongchamp RR; Chen T; Tsai CA
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Aug; 23(16):2104-12. PubMed ID: 17553853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Detecting differentially expressed genes by relative entropy.
    Yan X; Deng M; Fung WK; Qian M
    J Theor Biol; 2005 Jun; 234(3):395-402. PubMed ID: 15784273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Linear mixed model selection for false discovery rate control in microarray data analysis.
    Demirkale CY; Nettleton D; Maiti T
    Biometrics; 2010 Jun; 66(2):621-9. PubMed ID: 19522873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Leveraging two-way probe-level block design for identifying differential gene expression with high-density oligonucleotide arrays.
    Barrera L; Benner C; Tao YC; Winzeler E; Zhou Y
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2004 Apr; 5():42. PubMed ID: 15099405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.