These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

401 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24963785)

  • 1. Sensitivity of a subject-specific musculoskeletal model to the uncertainties on the joint axes location.
    Martelli S; Valente G; Viceconti M; Taddei F
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2015; 18(14):1555-63. PubMed ID: 24963785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interpreting Musculoskeletal Models and Dynamic Simulations: Causes and Effects of Differences Between Models.
    Roelker SA; Caruthers EJ; Baker RK; Pelz NC; Chaudhari AMW; Siston RA
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2017 Nov; 45(11):2635-2647. PubMed ID: 28779473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Contributions to the understanding of gait control.
    Simonsen EB
    Dan Med J; 2014 Apr; 61(4):B4823. PubMed ID: 24814597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of lower-limb joint models on subject-specific musculoskeletal models and simulations of daily motor activities.
    Valente G; Pitto L; Stagni R; Taddei F
    J Biomech; 2015 Dec; 48(16):4198-205. PubMed ID: 26506255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computation of the kinematics and the minimum peak joint moments of sit-to-stand movements.
    Yoshioka S; Nagano A; Himeno R; Fukashiro S
    Biomed Eng Online; 2007 Jul; 6():26. PubMed ID: 17608922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Are subject-specific musculoskeletal models robust to the uncertainties in parameter identification?
    Valente G; Pitto L; Testi D; Seth A; Delp SL; Stagni R; Viceconti M; Taddei F
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e112625. PubMed ID: 25390896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Higher medially-directed joint reaction forces are a characteristic of dysplastic hips: A comparative study using subject-specific musculoskeletal models.
    Harris MD; MacWilliams BA; Bo Foreman K; Peters CL; Weiss JA; Anderson AE
    J Biomech; 2017 Mar; 54():80-87. PubMed ID: 28233552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The study of muscle action during single support and swing phase of gait: clinical relevance of forward simulation techniques.
    Jonkers I; Stewart C; Spaepen A
    Gait Posture; 2003 Apr; 17(2):97-105. PubMed ID: 12633768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sensitivity of predicted muscle forces during gait to anatomical variability in musculotendon geometry.
    Bosmans L; Valente G; Wesseling M; Van Campen A; De Groote F; De Schutter J; Jonkers I
    J Biomech; 2015 Jul; 48(10):2116-23. PubMed ID: 25979383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The influence of maximum isometric muscle force scaling on estimated muscle forces from musculoskeletal models of children with cerebral palsy.
    Kainz H; Goudriaan M; Falisse A; Huenaerts C; Desloovere K; De Groote F; Jonkers I
    Gait Posture; 2018 Sep; 65():213-220. PubMed ID: 30558934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Muscle force estimation in clinical gait analysis using AnyBody and OpenSim.
    Trinler U; Schwameder H; Baker R; Alexander N
    J Biomech; 2019 Mar; 86():55-63. PubMed ID: 30739769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Repeatability of gait data using a functional hip joint centre and a mean helical knee axis.
    Besier TF; Sturnieks DL; Alderson JA; Lloyd DG
    J Biomech; 2003 Aug; 36(8):1159-68. PubMed ID: 12831742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A probabilistic approach to quantify the impact of uncertainty propagation in musculoskeletal simulations.
    Myers CA; Laz PJ; Shelburne KB; Davidson BS
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2015 May; 43(5):1098-111. PubMed ID: 25404535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Modified conventional gait model versus cluster tracking: Test-retest reliability, agreement and impact of inverse kinematics with joint constraints on kinematic and kinetic data.
    Mentiplay BF; Clark RA
    Gait Posture; 2018 Jul; 64():75-83. PubMed ID: 29879631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Computation of hip rotation kinematics retrospectively using functional knee calibration during gait.
    Sangeux M
    Gait Posture; 2018 Jun; 63():171-176. PubMed ID: 29763812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On the estimation of joint kinematics during gait.
    Ramakrishnan HK; Kadaba MP
    J Biomech; 1991; 24(10):969-77. PubMed ID: 1744154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Walking patterns and hip contact forces in patients with hip dysplasia.
    Skalshøi O; Iversen CH; Nielsen DB; Jacobsen J; Mechlenburg I; Søballe K; Sørensen H
    Gait Posture; 2015 Oct; 42(4):529-33. PubMed ID: 26365370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Modeling initial contact dynamics during ambulation with dynamic simulation.
    Meyer AR; Wang M; Smith PA; Harris GF
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2007 Apr; 45(4):387-94. PubMed ID: 17268804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison between overweight due to pregnancy and due to added weight to simulate body mass distribution in pregnancy.
    Aguiar L; Santos-Rocha R; Vieira F; Branco M; Andrade C; Veloso A
    Gait Posture; 2015 Oct; 42(4):511-7. PubMed ID: 26410476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sensitivity of a juvenile subject-specific musculoskeletal model of the ankle joint to the variability of operator-dependent input.
    Hannah I; Montefiori E; Modenese L; Prinold J; Viceconti M; Mazzà C
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2017 May; 231(5):415-422. PubMed ID: 28427313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.