203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24964386)
1. Empirical calibrated radiocarbon sampler: a tool for incorporating radiocarbon-date and calibration error into Bayesian phylogenetic analyses of ancient DNA.
Molak M; Suchard MA; Ho SY; Beilman DW; Shapiro B
Mol Ecol Resour; 2015 Jan; 15(1):81-6. PubMed ID: 24964386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Phylogenetic estimation of timescales using ancient DNA: the effects of temporal sampling scheme and uncertainty in sample ages.
Molak M; Lorenzen ED; Shapiro B; Ho SY
Mol Biol Evol; 2013 Feb; 30(2):253-62. PubMed ID: 23024187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pedigree-based Bayesian modelling of radiocarbon dates.
Massy K; Friedrich R; Mittnik A; Stockhammer PW
PLoS One; 2022; 17(6):e0270374. PubMed ID: 35771856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A combined method for DNA analysis and radiocarbon dating from a single sample.
Korlević P; Talamo S; Meyer M
Sci Rep; 2018 Mar; 8(1):4127. PubMed ID: 29515143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Middle to Upper Paleolithic transition: dating, stratigraphy, and isochronous markers.
Blockley SP; Ramsey CB; Higham TF
J Hum Evol; 2008 Nov; 55(5):764-71. PubMed ID: 18926557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Inferences from tip-calibrated phylogenies: a review and a practical guide.
Rieux A; Balloux F
Mol Ecol; 2016 May; 25(9):1911-24. PubMed ID: 26880113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The impact of calibration and clock-model choice on molecular estimates of divergence times.
Duchêne S; Lanfear R; Ho SY
Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2014 Sep; 78():277-89. PubMed ID: 24910154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Direct radiocarbon dating and DNA analysis of the Darra-i-Kur (Afghanistan) human temporal bone.
Douka K; Slon V; Stringer C; Potts R; Hübner A; Meyer M; Spoor F; Pääbo S; Higham T
J Hum Evol; 2017 Jun; 107():86-93. PubMed ID: 28526291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Bayesian phylogenetic method to estimate unknown sequence ages.
Shapiro B; Ho SY; Drummond AJ; Suchard MA; Pybus OG; Rambaut A
Mol Biol Evol; 2011 Feb; 28(2):879-87. PubMed ID: 20889726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Precision dating of the Palaeolithic: a new radiocarbon chronology for the Abri Pataud (France), a key Aurignacian sequence.
Higham T; Jacobi R; Basell L; Ramsey CB; Chiotti L; Nespoulet R
J Hum Evol; 2011 Nov; 61(5):549-63. PubMed ID: 21868058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A genetic method for dating ancient genomes provides a direct estimate of human generation interval in the last 45,000 years.
Moorjani P; Sankararaman S; Fu Q; Przeworski M; Patterson N; Reich D
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2016 May; 113(20):5652-7. PubMed ID: 27140627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Collagen Fingerprinting: A New Screening Technique for Radiocarbon Dating Ancient Bone.
Harvey VL; Egerton VM; Chamberlain AT; Manning PL; Buckley M
PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0150650. PubMed ID: 26938469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Age estimates for hominin fossils and the onset of the Upper Palaeolithic at Denisova Cave.
Douka K; Slon V; Jacobs Z; Ramsey CB; Shunkov MV; Derevianko AP; Mafessoni F; Kozlikin MB; Li B; Grün R; Comeskey D; Devièse T; Brown S; Viola B; Kinsley L; Buckley M; Meyer M; Roberts RG; Pääbo S; Kelso J; Higham T
Nature; 2019 Jan; 565(7741):640-644. PubMed ID: 30700871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Bayesian approach for fitting and comparing demographic growth models of radiocarbon dates: A case study on the Jomon-Yayoi transition in Kyushu (Japan).
Crema ER; Shoda S
PLoS One; 2021; 16(5):e0251695. PubMed ID: 34010349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A revised radiocarbon calibration curve 350-250 BCE impacts high-precision dating of the Kyrenia Ship.
Manning SW; Lorentzen B; Bridge M; Dee MW; Southon J; Wenger M
PLoS One; 2024; 19(6):e0302645. PubMed ID: 38924012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of methods for estimating substitution rates from ancient DNA sequence data.
Tong KJ; Duchêne DA; Duchêne S; Geoghegan JL; Ho SYW
BMC Evol Biol; 2018 May; 18(1):70. PubMed ID: 29769015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluating fossil calibrations for dating phylogenies in light of rates of molecular evolution: a comparison of three approaches.
Lukoschek V; Scott Keogh J; Avise JC
Syst Biol; 2012 Jan; 61(1):22-43. PubMed ID: 21840843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of different strategies for using fossil calibrations to generate the time prior in Bayesian molecular clock dating.
Barba-Montoya J; Dos Reis M; Yang Z
Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2017 Sep; 114():386-400. PubMed ID: 28709986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An evaluation of fossil tip-dating versus node-age calibrations in tetraodontiform fishes (Teleostei: Percomorphaceae).
Arcila D; Alexander Pyron R; Tyler JC; Ortí G; Betancur-R R
Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2015 Jan; 82 Pt A():131-45. PubMed ID: 25462998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. COMBINING ANCIENT DNA AND RADIOCARBON DATING DATA TO INCREASE CHRONOLOGICAL ACCURACY.
Sedig JW; Olade I; Patterson N; Harney É; Reich D
J Archaeol Sci; 2021 Sep; 133():. PubMed ID: 34483440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
