These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
8. Dental cone beam computed tomography: justification for use in planning oral implant placement. Jacobs R; Quirynen M Periodontol 2000; 2014 Oct; 66(1):203-13. PubMed ID: 25123769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Current state of the art of computer-guided implant surgery. D'haese J; Ackhurst J; Wismeijer D; De Bruyn H; Tahmaseb A Periodontol 2000; 2017 Feb; 73(1):121-133. PubMed ID: 28000275 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Surgical positioning of orthodontic mini-implants with guides fabricated on models replicated with cone-beam computed tomography. Kim SH; Choi YS; Hwang EH; Chung KR; Kook YA; Nelson G Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Apr; 131(4 Suppl):S82-9. PubMed ID: 17448391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Implant planning and placement using optical scanning and cone beam CT technology. van der Zel JM J Prosthodont; 2008 Aug; 17(6):476-81. PubMed ID: 18482361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reliability of implant placement after virtual planning of implant positions using cone beam CT data and surgical (guide) templates. Nickenig HJ; Eitner S J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2007; 35(4-5):207-11. PubMed ID: 17576068 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reliability of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical guides generated from computed tomography: clinical data from 94 implants. Ersoy AE; Turkyilmaz I; Ozan O; McGlumphy EA J Periodontol; 2008 Aug; 79(8):1339-45. PubMed ID: 18672982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Defining new paradigms for assessment of implant receptor sites. The use of CT/CBCT and interactive virtual treatment planning for congenitally missing lateral incisors. Ganz SD Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2008 Jun; 29(5):256-8, 260-2, 264-7; quiz 268, 278. PubMed ID: 18795643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy and complications of computer-designed selective laser sintering surgical guides for flapless dental implant placement and immediate definitive prosthesis installation. Di Giacomo GA; da Silva JV; da Silva AM; Paschoal GH; Cury PR; Szarf G J Periodontol; 2012 Apr; 83(4):410-9. PubMed ID: 21819249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The expanding influence of computed tomography and the application of computer-guided implantology. Mandelaris GA; Rosenfeld AL Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2008 Jun; 20(5):297-305; quiz 306. PubMed ID: 18649832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An open system approach for surgical guide production. Abboud M; Orentlicher G J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Dec; 69(12):e519-24. PubMed ID: 22117708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of operator experience on the accuracy of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical templates: an in vitro study. Cushen SE; Turkyilmaz I J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):248-54. PubMed ID: 23566606 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Rehabilitation of a dentate mandible requiring a full arch rehabilitation. Immediate loading of a fixed complete denture on 8 implants placed with a bone-supported surgical computer-planned guide: a case report. Amorfini L; Storelli S; Romeo E J Oral Implantol; 2011 Mar; 37 Spec No():106-13. PubMed ID: 21495798 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]