185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24964698)
1. Measurement of utility.
Thavorncharoensap M
J Med Assoc Thai; 2014 May; 97 Suppl 5():S43-9. PubMed ID: 24964698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quality-adjusted life-years lack quality in pediatric care: a critical review of published cost-utility studies in child health.
Griebsch I; Coast J; Brown J
Pediatrics; 2005 May; 115(5):e600-14. PubMed ID: 15867026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Measurement of clinical-effect: utility.
Sakthong P
J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 Jun; 91 Suppl 2():S43-52. PubMed ID: 19253487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. QALY weights for diabetic retinopathy--a comparison of health state valuations with HUI-3, EQ-5D, EQ-VAS, and TTO.
Heintz E; Wiréhn AB; Peebo BB; Rosenqvist U; Levin LÅ
Value Health; 2012 May; 15(3):475-84. PubMed ID: 22583458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessing utility values in rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison between time trade-off and the EuroQol.
Ariza-Ariza R; Hernández-Cruz B; Carmona L; Dolores Ruiz-Montesinos M; Ballina J; Navarro-Sarabia F;
Arthritis Rheum; 2006 Oct; 55(5):751-6. PubMed ID: 17013822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost-utility analysis of cochlear implants in Korea using different measures of utility.
Lee HY; Park EC; Kim HJ; Choi JY; Kim HN
Acta Otolaryngol; 2006 Aug; 126(8):817-23. PubMed ID: 16846923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Not all "quality-adjusted life years" are equal.
Marra CA; Marion SA; Guh DP; Najafzadeh M; Wolfe F; Esdaile JM; Clarke AE; Gignac MA; Anis AH
J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 Jun; 60(6):616-24. PubMed ID: 17493521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of SF-6D and EQ-5D utility scores in a study of patients with schizophrenia.
McCrone P; Patel A; Knapp M; Schene A; Koeter M; Amaddeo F; Ruggeri M; Giessler A; Puschner B; Thornicroft G
J Ment Health Policy Econ; 2009 Mar; 12(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 19346564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A view from the bridge: agreement between the SF-6D utility algorithm and the Health Utilities Index.
O'Brien BJ; Spath M; Blackhouse G; Severens JL; Dorian P; Brazier J
Health Econ; 2003 Nov; 12(11):975-81. PubMed ID: 14601159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Trends in the measurement of health utilities in published cost-utility analyses.
Brauer CA; Rosen AB; Greenberg D; Neumann PJ
Value Health; 2006; 9(4):213-8. PubMed ID: 16903990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Which multi-attribute utility instruments are recommended for use in cost-utility analysis? A review of national health technology assessment (HTA) guidelines.
Kennedy-Martin M; Slaap B; Herdman M; van Reenen M; Kennedy-Martin T; Greiner W; Busschbach J; Boye KS
Eur J Health Econ; 2020 Nov; 21(8):1245-1257. PubMed ID: 32514643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Italian population-based values of EQ-5D health states.
Scalone L; Cortesi PA; Ciampichini R; Belisari A; D'Angiolella LS; Cesana G; Mantovani LG
Value Health; 2013; 16(5):814-22. PubMed ID: 23947975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Preferences for health outcomes and cost-utility analysis.
Torrance GW
Am J Manag Care; 1997 May; 3 Suppl():S8-20. PubMed ID: 10180342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cost-utility analysis of the cochlear implant.
Lee HY; Kim HN; Kim HJ; Choi JY; Park EC
J Prev Med Public Health; 2004 Nov; 37(4):353-8. PubMed ID: 25175617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Measuring utilities of severe facial disfigurement and composite tissue allotransplantation of the face in patients with severe face and neck burns from the perspectives of the general public, medical experts and patients.
Chuback J; Yarascavitch B; Yarascavitch A; Kaur MN; Martin S; Thoma A
Burns; 2015 Nov; 41(7):1524-31. PubMed ID: 26068209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Utility values in health technology assessments: a statistician's perspective.
Whately-Smith C; Watkins C; Mann H; Fletcher C; Ducournau P
Pharm Stat; 2014; 13(3):184-95. PubMed ID: 24692364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Community or patient preferences for cost-effectiveness of cardiac rehabilitation: does it matter?
Oldridge N; Furlong W; Perkins A; Feeny D; Torrance GW
Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil; 2008 Oct; 15(5):608-15. PubMed ID: 18800005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of the EuroQol and short form 6D in Singapore multiethnic Asian knee osteoarthritis patients scheduled for total knee replacement.
Xie F; Li SC; Luo N; Lo NN; Yeo SJ; Yang KY; Fong KY; Thumboo J
Arthritis Rheum; 2007 Aug; 57(6):1043-9. PubMed ID: 17665466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Can health utility measures be used in lupus research? A comparative validation and reliability study of 4 utility indices.
Moore AD; Clarke AE; Danoff DS; Joseph L; Bélisle P; Neville C; Fortin PR
J Rheumatol; 1999 Jun; 26(6):1285-90. PubMed ID: 10381044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment of health state in patients with tinnitus: a comparison of the EQ-5D and HUI mark III.
Maes IH; Joore MA; Cima RF; Vlaeyen JW; Anteunis LJ
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):428-35. PubMed ID: 21221004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
