378 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24965741)
21. Failed attempts to help and harm: intention versus outcome in preverbal infants' social evaluations.
Hamlin JK
Cognition; 2013 Sep; 128(3):451-74. PubMed ID: 23811094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Perceiving the agency of harmful agents: A test of dehumanization versus moral typecasting accounts.
Khamitov M; Rotman JD; Piazza J
Cognition; 2016 Jan; 146():33-47. PubMed ID: 26398862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Mechanism of the better-than-average effect in moral issues: Asymmetrical causal attribution across moral (vs. immoral) contexts.
Han K; Kim MY
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2022 Jun; 226():103575. PubMed ID: 35367637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Second-order beliefs about intention and children's attributions of sociomoral judgment.
Shiverick SM; Moore CF
J Exp Child Psychol; 2007 May; 97(1):44-60. PubMed ID: 17313956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Asymmetrical effects of reward and punishment on attributions of morality.
Greitemeyer T; Weiner B
J Soc Psychol; 2008 Aug; 148(4):407-20. PubMed ID: 18807419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Bad guys suffer less (social pain): Moral status influences judgements of others' social suffering.
Riva P; Brambilla M; Vaes J
Br J Soc Psychol; 2016 Mar; 55(1):88-108. PubMed ID: 25891265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Cruel nature: Harmfulness as an important, overlooked dimension in judgments of moral standing.
Piazza J; Landy JF; Goodwin GP
Cognition; 2014 Apr; 131(1):108-24. PubMed ID: 24462925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Acting intentionally and the side-effect effect.
Leslie AM; Knobe J; Cohen A
Psychol Sci; 2006 May; 17(5):421-7. PubMed ID: 16683930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Moral anger, but not moral disgust, responds to intentionality.
Russell PS; Giner-Sorolla R
Emotion; 2011 Apr; 11(2):233-40. PubMed ID: 21500892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Weighing outcome vs. intent across societies: How cultural models of mind shape moral reasoning.
McNamara RA; Willard AK; Norenzayan A; Henrich J
Cognition; 2019 Jan; 182():95-108. PubMed ID: 30227333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Social perception in moral judgments of interpersonal transgressions.
Adams GS; O'Connor KS; Belmi P
Curr Opin Psychol; 2022 Apr; 44():177-181. PubMed ID: 34688999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Syntax and intentionality: an automatic link between language and theory-of-mind.
Strickland B; Fisher M; Keil F; Knobe J
Cognition; 2014 Oct; 133(1):249-61. PubMed ID: 25058414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. More than a body: mind perception and the nature of objectification.
Gray K; Knobe J; Sheskin M; Bloom P; Barrett LF
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2011 Dec; 101(6):1207-20. PubMed ID: 22059848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Intention matters to make you (im)moral: Positive-negative asymmetry in moral character evaluations.
Hirozawa PY; Karasawa M; Matsuo A
J Soc Psychol; 2020 Jul; 160(4):401-415. PubMed ID: 31423929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Norms inform mental state ascriptions: A rational explanation for the side-effect effect.
Uttich K; Lombrozo T
Cognition; 2010 Jul; 116(1):87-100. PubMed ID: 20472228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Blaming god for our pain: human suffering and the divine mind.
Gray K; Wegner DM
Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 2010 Feb; 14(1):7-16. PubMed ID: 19926831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Information-Acquisition Processes in Moral Judgments of Blame.
Guglielmo S; Malle BF
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2017 Jul; 43(7):957-971. PubMed ID: 28903702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. What matters when judging intentionality-moral content or normative status? Testing the rational scientist model of the side-effect.
Papadopoulos C; Hayes BK
Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Jun; 25(3):1170-1177. PubMed ID: 28508353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Why side-effect outcomes do not affect intuitions about intentional actions: properly shifting the focus from intentional outcomes back to intentional actions.
Laurent SM; Clark BA; Schweitzer KA
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2015 Jan; 108(1):18-36. PubMed ID: 25111302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The sadistic trait predicts minimization of intention and causal responsibility in moral judgment.
Trémolière B; Djeriouat H
Cognition; 2016 Jan; 146():158-71. PubMed ID: 26414248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
