These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24965916)

  • 1. Bilateral breast MRI by use of dual-source parallel radiofrequency excitation and image-based shimming at 3 Tesla: improvement in homogeneity on fat-suppression imaging.
    Ishizaka K; Kato F; Terae S; Mito S; Oyama-Manabe N; Kamishima T; Nakanishi M; Sugimori H; Hamaguchi H; Shirato H
    Radiol Phys Technol; 2015 Jan; 8(1):4-12. PubMed ID: 24965916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dual-source parallel radiofrequency transmission for magnetic resonance breast imaging at 3T: any added clinical value?
    Jiang L; Zhou Y; Zhou C; Chen M; Dai Y; Fu Y; Zhao X
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Jun; 32(5):523-8. PubMed ID: 24582548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improved B1 homogeneity of 3 Tesla breast MRI using dual-source parallel radiofrequency excitation.
    Rahbar H; Partridge SC; Demartini WB; Gutierrez RL; Parsian S; Lehman CD
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 May; 35(5):1222-6. PubMed ID: 22282269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ultrafast volumetric B1 (+) mapping for improved radiofrequency shimming in 3 tesla body MRI.
    Sprinkart AM; Nehrke K; Träber F; Block W; Gieseke J; Schmitz G; Willinek WA; Schild H; Börnert P
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Oct; 40(4):857-63. PubMed ID: 24924914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Breast MRI at 7 Tesla with a bilateral coil and T1-weighted acquisition with robust fat suppression: image evaluation and comparison with 3 Tesla.
    Brown R; Storey P; Geppert C; McGorty K; Leite AP; Babb J; Sodickson DK; Wiggins GC; Moy L
    Eur Radiol; 2013 Nov; 23(11):2969-78. PubMed ID: 23896763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dual-source parallel radiofrequency excitation body MR imaging compared with standard MR imaging at 3.0 T: initial clinical experience.
    Willinek WA; Gieseke J; Kukuk GM; Nelles M; König R; Morakkabati-Spitz N; Träber F; Thomas D; Kuhl CK; Schild HH
    Radiology; 2010 Sep; 256(3):966-75. PubMed ID: 20720078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improved fat suppression of the breast using discretized frequency shimming.
    van der Velden TA; Luijten PR; Klomp DWJ
    Magn Reson Med; 2018 Jan; 79(1):593-599. PubMed ID: 28244136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Liver: segment-specific analysis of B1 field homogeneity at 3.0-T MR imaging with single-source versus dual-source parallel radiofrequency excitation.
    Pazahr S; Fischer MA; Chuck N; Luechinger R; Schick F; Nanz D; Boss A
    Radiology; 2012 Nov; 265(2):591-9. PubMed ID: 22929333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comprehensive Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced 3D Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Breast With Fat/Water Separation and High Spatiotemporal Resolution Using Radial Sampling, Compressed Sensing, and Parallel Imaging.
    Benkert T; Block KT; Heller S; Moccaldi M; Sodickson DK; Kim SG; Moy L
    Invest Radiol; 2017 Oct; 52(10):583-589. PubMed ID: 28398929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Homogenous fat suppression for bilateral breast imaging using independent shims.
    Han M; Cunningham CH; Pauly JM; Daniel BL; Hargreaves BA
    Magn Reson Med; 2014 Apr; 71(4):1511-7. PubMed ID: 23821305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Gadoxetic acid-enhanced fat suppressed three-dimensional T1-weighted MRI using a multiecho dixon technique at 3 tesla: emphasis on image quality and hepatocellular carcinoma detection.
    Lee MH; Kim YK; Park MJ; Hwang J; Kim SH; Lee WJ; Choi D
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Aug; 38(2):401-10. PubMed ID: 23292998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of the artifacts caused by metallic implants in breast MRI using dual-echo dixon versus conventional fat-suppression techniques.
    Le Y; Kipfer HD; Majidi SS; Holz S; Lin C
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Sep; 203(3):W307-14. PubMed ID: 25148189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fast multistation water/fat imaging at 3T using DREAM-based RF shimming.
    Hooijmans MT; Dzyubachyk O; Nehrke K; Koken P; Versluis MJ; Kan HE; Börnert P
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Jul; 42(1):217-23. PubMed ID: 25331294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fat suppression with spectrally selective inversion vs. high spectral and spatial resolution MRI of breast lesions: qualitative and quantitative comparisons.
    Fan X; Abe H; Medved M; Foxley S; Arkani S; Zamora MA; Olopade OI; Newstead GM; Karczmar GS
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Dec; 24(6):1311-5. PubMed ID: 17096393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Whole-body continuously moving table fat-water MRI with dynamic B0 shimming at 3 Tesla.
    Sengupta S; Smith DS; Gifford A; Welch EB
    Magn Reson Med; 2016 Jul; 76(1):183-90. PubMed ID: 26198380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Short T2 tissue imaging with the Pointwise Encoding Time reduction with Radial Acquisition (PETRA) sequence: the additional value of fat saturation and subtraction in the meniscus.
    Lee YH; Suh JS; Grodzki D
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 May; 33(4):385-9. PubMed ID: 25614216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Rapid fat suppression for three-dimensional echo planar imaging with minimized specific absorption rate.
    Stirnberg R; Brenner D; Stöcker T; Shah NJ
    Magn Reson Med; 2016 Nov; 76(5):1517-1523. PubMed ID: 26612608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. T1-weighted fat-suppressed imaging of the pelvis with a dual-echo Dixon technique: initial clinical experience.
    Beddy P; Rangarajan RD; Kataoka M; Moyle P; Graves MJ; Sala E
    Radiology; 2011 Feb; 258(2):583-9. PubMed ID: 21079201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ovarian masses: MR imaging with T1-weighted 3-dimensional gradient-echo IDEAL water-fat separation sequence at 3T.
    Hori M; Kim T; Onishi H; Nakamoto A; Tsuboyama T; Tatsumi M; Tomiyama N
    Magn Reson Med Sci; 2012; 11(2):117-27. PubMed ID: 22790298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantification of cervical spine muscle fat: a comparison between T1-weighted and multi-echo gradient echo imaging using a variable projection algorithm (VARPRO).
    Elliott JM; Walton DM; Rademaker A; Parrish TB
    BMC Med Imaging; 2013 Sep; 13():30. PubMed ID: 24020963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.