127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24966996)
21. Comparison of Permacol™ and Strattice™ for the repair of abdominal wall defects.
Mulier KE; Nguyen AH; Delaney JP; Marquez S
Hernia; 2011 Jun; 15(3):315-9. PubMed ID: 21234626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Lack of identifiable biologic behavior in a series of porcine mesh explants.
De Silva GS; Krpata DM; Gao Y; Criss CN; Anderson JM; Soltanian HT; Rosen MJ; Novitsky YW
Surgery; 2014 Jul; 156(1):183-9. PubMed ID: 24856669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Hydrated vs. freeze-dried human acellular dermal matrix for hernia repair: a comparison in a rabbit model.
Roth JS; Dexter DD; Lumpkins K; Bochicchio GV
Hernia; 2009 Apr; 13(2):201-7. PubMed ID: 19023639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Strength of tissue attachment to composite and ePTFE grafts after ventral hernia repair.
Iannitti DA; Hope WW; Tsikitis V
JSLS; 2007; 11(4):415-21. PubMed ID: 18237503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of two porcine-derived materials for repairing abdominal wall defects in rats.
Liu Z; Tang R; Zhou Z; Song Z; Wang H; Gu Y
PLoS One; 2011; 6(5):e20520. PubMed ID: 21637777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Clinical application and long-term follow-up study of porcine acellular dermal matrix combined with autoskin grafting.
Jiong C; Jiake C; Chunmao H; Yingen P; Qiuhe W; Zhouxi F; Xiangsheng F
J Burn Care Res; 2010; 31(2):280-5. PubMed ID: 20182383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Remodeling characteristics and biomechanical properties of a crosslinked versus a non-crosslinked porcine dermis scaffolds in a porcine model of ventral hernia repair.
Cavallo JA; Greco SC; Liu J; Frisella MM; Deeken CR; Matthews BD
Hernia; 2015 Apr; 19(2):207-18. PubMed ID: 23483265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Three types of dermal grafts in rats: the importance of mechanical property and structural design.
You C; Wang X; Zheng Y; Han C
Biomed Eng Online; 2013 Dec; 12():125. PubMed ID: 24304500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Are biologic grafts effective for hernia repair?: a systematic review of the literature.
Hiles M; Record Ritchie RD; Altizer AM
Surg Innov; 2009 Mar; 16(1):26-37. PubMed ID: 19223383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of cross-linked and non-cross-linked porcine acellular dermal matrices for ventral hernia repair.
Butler CE; Burns NK; Campbell KT; Mathur AB; Jaffari MV; Rios CN
J Am Coll Surg; 2010 Sep; 211(3):368-76. PubMed ID: 20800194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Adverse effects associated with the use of porcine cross-linked collagen implants in an experimental model of incisional hernia repair.
Petter-Puchner AH; Fortelny RH; Walder N; Mittermayr R; Ohlinger W; van Griensven M; Redl H
J Surg Res; 2008 Mar; 145(1):105-10. PubMed ID: 17628597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Revascularization of human acellular dermis in full-thickness abdominal wall reconstruction in the rabbit model.
Menon NG; Rodriguez ED; Byrnes CK; Girotto JA; Goldberg NH; Silverman RP
Ann Plast Surg; 2003 May; 50(5):523-7. PubMed ID: 12792544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Invivo biocompatibility determination of acellular aortic matrix of buffalo origin.
Jetty D; Sharma AK; Kumar N; Shrivastava S; Sonal B; Rai RB
Prog Biomater; 2014 Dec; 3(2-4):115-122. PubMed ID: 29470768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Augmentation of the insufficient tissue bed for surgical repair of hypospadias using acellular matrix grafts: A proof of concept study.
Morgante D; Radford A; Abbas SK; Ingham E; Subramaniam R; Southgate J
J Tissue Eng; 2021; 12():2041731421998840. PubMed ID: 33959244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Non-cross-linked porcine acellular dermal matrices for abdominal wall reconstruction.
Burns NK; Jaffari MV; Rios CN; Mathur AB; Butler CE
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010 Jan; 125(1):167-176. PubMed ID: 19910855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Not all biologics are equal!
Shah BC; Tiwari MM; Goede MR; Eichler MJ; Hollins RR; McBride CL; Thompson JS; Oleynikov D
Hernia; 2011 Apr; 15(2):165-71. PubMed ID: 21188442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Biomechanical and histologic evaluation of fenestrated and nonfenestrated biologic mesh in a porcine model of ventral hernia repair.
Jenkins ED; Melman L; Deeken CR; Greco SC; Frisella MM; Matthews BD
J Am Coll Surg; 2011 Mar; 212(3):327-39. PubMed ID: 21356487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Full incorporation of Strattice™ Reconstructive Tissue Matrix in a reinforced hiatal hernia repair: a case report.
Freedman BE
J Med Case Rep; 2012 Aug; 6():234. PubMed ID: 22876792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Biologic hernia implants in experimental intraperitoneal onlay mesh plasty repair: the impact of proprietary collagen processing methods and fibrin sealant application on tissue integration.
Petter-Puchner AH; Fortelny RH; Silic K; Brand J; Gruber-Blum S; Redl H
Surg Endosc; 2011 Oct; 25(10):3245-52. PubMed ID: 21533522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Dermal collagen matrices for ventral hernia repair: comparative analysis in a rat model.
Broderick G; McIntyre J; Noury M; Strom HM; Psoinos C; Christakas A; Billiar K; Hurwitz ZM; Lalikos JF; Ignotz RA; Dunn RM
Hernia; 2012 Jun; 16(3):333-43. PubMed ID: 22120024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
