These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24967636)

  • 21. A comparative study of different machine learning methods on microarray gene expression data.
    Pirooznia M; Yang JY; Yang MQ; Deng Y
    BMC Genomics; 2008; 9 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S13. PubMed ID: 18366602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Selecting Shrinkage Parameters for Effect Estimation: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis.
    Keller JP; Rice KM
    Am J Epidemiol; 2018 Feb; 187(2):358-365. PubMed ID: 28992037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Part 1. Statistical Learning Methods for the Effects of Multiple Air Pollution Constituents.
    Coull BA; Bobb JF; Wellenius GA; Kioumourtzoglou MA; Mittleman MA; Koutrakis P; Godleski JJ
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2015 Jun; (183 Pt 1-2):5-50. PubMed ID: 26333238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Top scoring pairs for feature selection in machine learning and applications to cancer outcome prediction.
    Shi P; Ray S; Zhu Q; Kon MA
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2011 Sep; 12():375. PubMed ID: 21939564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparative evaluation of classifiers in the presence of statistical interactions between features in high dimensional data settings.
    Guo Y; Balasubramanian R
    Int J Biostat; 2012 Jun; 8(1):Article 17. PubMed ID: 22752837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Entropy-based gene ranking without selection bias for the predictive classification of microarray data.
    Furlanello C; Serafini M; Merler S; Jurman G
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2003 Nov; 4():54. PubMed ID: 14604446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Feature selection and classifier performance in computer-aided diagnosis: the effect of finite sample size.
    Sahiner B; Chan HP; Petrick N; Wagner RF; Hadjiiski L
    Med Phys; 2000 Jul; 27(7):1509-22. PubMed ID: 10947254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effects of pooling samples on the performance of classification algorithms: a comparative study.
    Kusonmano K; Netzer M; Baumgartner C; Dehmer M; Liedl KR; Graber A
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2012; 2012():278352. PubMed ID: 22654582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Probabilistic classification vector machines.
    Chen H; Tino P; Yao X
    IEEE Trans Neural Netw; 2009 Jun; 20(6):901-14. PubMed ID: 19398403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Large-scale learning of structure-activity relationships using a linear support vector machine and problem-specific metrics.
    Hinselmann G; Rosenbaum L; Jahn A; Fechner N; Ostermann C; Zell A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Feb; 51(2):203-13. PubMed ID: 21207929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Computer-assisted lip diagnosis on Traditional Chinese Medicine using multi-class support vector machines.
    Li F; Zhao C; Xia Z; Wang Y; Zhou X; Li GZ
    BMC Complement Altern Med; 2012 Aug; 12():127. PubMed ID: 22898352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Probability machines: consistent probability estimation using nonparametric learning machines.
    Malley JD; Kruppa J; Dasgupta A; Malley KG; Ziegler A
    Methods Inf Med; 2012; 51(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 21915433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparative evaluation of set-level techniques in predictive classification of gene expression samples.
    Holec M; Kléma J; Zelezný F; Tolar J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2012 Jun; 13 Suppl 10(Suppl 10):S15. PubMed ID: 22759420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Application of genetic algorithms and constructive neural networks for the analysis of microarray cancer data.
    Luque-Baena RM; Urda D; Subirats JL; Franco L; Jerez JM
    Theor Biol Med Model; 2014 May; 11 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S7. PubMed ID: 25077572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Single-center versus multi-center data sets for molecular prognostic modeling: a simulation study.
    Samaga D; Hornung R; Braselmann H; Hess J; Zitzelsberger H; Belka C; Boulesteix AL; Unger K
    Radiat Oncol; 2020 May; 15(1):109. PubMed ID: 32410693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Classification of electrocardiogram signals with support vector machines and particle swarm optimization.
    Melgani F; Bazi Y
    IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 2008 Sep; 12(5):667-77. PubMed ID: 18779082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Prediction of human breast and colon cancers from imbalanced data using nearest neighbor and support vector machines.
    Majid A; Ali S; Iqbal M; Kausar N
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2014 Mar; 113(3):792-808. PubMed ID: 24472367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38.
    Raeisi Shahraki H; Pourahmad S; Zare N
    Biomed Res Int; 2017; 2017():7560807. PubMed ID: 29376076
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Probability estimation with machine learning methods for dichotomous and multicategory outcome: theory.
    Kruppa J; Liu Y; Biau G; Kohler M; König IR; Malley JD; Ziegler A
    Biom J; 2014 Jul; 56(4):534-63. PubMed ID: 24478134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Propensity scores as a novel method to guide sample allocation and minimize batch effects during the design of high throughput experiments.
    Carry PM; Vigers T; Vanderlinden LA; Keeter C; Dong F; Buckner T; Litkowski E; Yang I; Norris JM; Kechris K
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2023 Mar; 24(1):86. PubMed ID: 36882691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.