These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24967984)
1. Light-curing time and aging effects on the nanomechanical properties of methacrylate- and silorane-based restorations. Catelan A; Pollard T; Bedran-Russo A; Santos PD; Ambrosano G; Aguiar F Oper Dent; 2014; 39(4):389-97. PubMed ID: 24967984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Methacrylate- and silorane-based composite restorations: hardness, depth of cure and interfacial gap formation as a function of the energy dose. D'Alpino PH; Bechtold J; dos Santos PJ; Alonso RC; Di Hipólito V; Silikas N; Rodrigues FP Dent Mater; 2011 Nov; 27(11):1162-9. PubMed ID: 21925724 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Three-year clinical evaluation of a silorane composite resin. Walter R; Boushell LW; Heymann HO; Ritter AV; Sturdevant JR; Wilder AD; Chung Y; Swift EJ J Esthet Restor Dent; 2014; 26(3):179-90. PubMed ID: 24344912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of silorane and methacrylate-based composites on the polymerization heat generated with different light-curing units and dentin thicknesses. Guiraldo RD; Consani S; Consani RL; Berger SB; Correr AB; Sinhoreti MA; Correr-Sobrinho L Braz Dent J; 2013; 24(3):258-62. PubMed ID: 23969916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Microleakage evaluation of Silorane-based composite and methacrylate-based composite in class II box preparations using two different layering techniques: an in vitro study. Joseph A; Santhosh L; Hegde J; Panchajanya S; George R Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(1):148. PubMed ID: 23852255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of volumetric shrinkage and curing light intensity on proximal contact tightness of class II resin composite restorations: in vitro study. El-Shamy H; Saber MH; Dörfer CE; El-Badrawy W; Loomans BA Oper Dent; 2012; 37(2):205-10. PubMed ID: 22313267 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Microtensile bond strength of methacrylate and silorane resins to enamel and dentin. da Silva GR; Araújo IS; Pereira RD; Barreto Bde C; do Prado CJ; Soares CJ; Martins LR Braz Dent J; 2014; 25(4):327-31. PubMed ID: 25250497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Hydrolytic degradation of silorane- and methacrylate-based composite restorations: Evaluation of push-out strength and marginal adaptation. Santos PJ; Silva MS; Alonso RC; D'Alpino PH Acta Odontol Scand; 2013 Sep; 71(5):1273-9. PubMed ID: 23394207 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Microtensile bond strength of a new silorane-based composite resin adhesive. Giacobbi MF; Vandewalle KS Gen Dent; 2012; 60(3):e148-52. PubMed ID: 22623470 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Repair of dimethacrylate-based composite restorations by a silorane-based composite: a one-year randomized clinical trial. Popoff DA; Santa Rosa TT; Ferreira RC; Magalhães CS; Moreira AN; Mjör IA Oper Dent; 2012; 37(5):E1-10. PubMed ID: 22616930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Microleakage and microtensile bond strength of silorane-based and dimethacrylate-based restorative systems. Santos MJ; Podorieszach A; Rizkalla AS; Santos GC Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2013; 34 Spec No 8():19-24. PubMed ID: 24568172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A double-blind randomized clinical trial of a silorane-based resin composite in class 2 restorations: 18-month follow-up. Gonçalves FS; Leal CD; Bueno AC; Freitas AB; Moreira AN; Magalhães CS Am J Dent; 2013 Apr; 26(2):93-8. PubMed ID: 24073532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Three-year clinical evaluation of different restorative resins in class I restorations. Yazici AR; Ustunkol I; Ozgunaltay G; Dayangac B Oper Dent; 2014; 39(3):248-55. PubMed ID: 24754716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of C-factor on microtensile bond strengths of low-shrinkage composites. El-Sahn NA; El-Kassas DW; El-Damanhoury HM; Fahmy OM; Gomaa H; Platt JA Oper Dent; 2011; 36(3):281-92. PubMed ID: 21740240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical Evaluation of a Silorane- and a Methacrylate-Based Resin Composite in Class II Restorations: 24-Month Results. Karaman E; Yazici AR; Ozgunaltay G; Ustunkol I; Berber A Oper Dent; 2017; 42(4):E102-E110. PubMed ID: 28682704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bonding durability of silorane and methacrylate-based resins to enamel. Moura S; Chimentão L; Kléin-Júnior C; Mattos A; Carvalho R; Guiraldo R; Poli-Frederico R; Miranda-Júnior W Minerva Stomatol; 2015 Jun; 64(3):135-42. PubMed ID: 25799447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Microleakage of nanofilled resin-modified glass-ionomer/silorane- or methacrylate-based composite sandwich Class II restoration: effect of simultaneous bonding. Shafiei F; Akbarian S Oper Dent; 2014; 39(1):E22-30. PubMed ID: 23865583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of filling technique on the bond strength of methacrylate and silorane-based composite restorations. Machado FW; Borges FB; Cenci MS; Moraes RR; Boscato N Braz Oral Res; 2016; 30():. PubMed ID: 27050940 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems. Kasraei S; Azarsina M; Majidi S Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of different modes of light curing and resin composites on microleakage of Class II restorations. Hardan LS; Amm EW; Ghayad A Odontostomatol Trop; 2008 Dec; 31(124):27-34. PubMed ID: 19441264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]