These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24968513)

  • 1. The impact of load on lower body performance variables during the hang power clean.
    Suchomel TJ; Beckham GK; Wright GA
    Sports Biomech; 2014 Mar; 13(1):87-95. PubMed ID: 24968513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of various loads on the force-time characteristics of the hang high pull.
    Suchomel TJ; Beckham GK; Wright GA
    J Strength Cond Res; 2015 May; 29(5):1295-301. PubMed ID: 25426514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of load and sex on kinematic and kinetic variables during the mid-thigh clean pull.
    Comfort P; Jones PA; Udall R
    Sports Biomech; 2015 Jun; 14(2):139-56. PubMed ID: 25896197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of different relative intensities on power output during the hang power clean: identification of the optimal load.
    Kawamori N; Crum AJ; Blumert PA; Kulik JR; Childers JT; Wood JA; Stone MH; Haff GG
    J Strength Cond Res; 2005 Aug; 19(3):698-708. PubMed ID: 16095428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Kinetic comparison of the power development between power clean variations.
    Suchomel TJ; Wright GA; Kernozek TW; Kline DE
    J Strength Cond Res; 2014 Feb; 28(2):350-60. PubMed ID: 23689341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Jump Shrug Height and Landing Forces Across Various Loads.
    Suchomel TJ; Taber CB; Wright GA
    Int J Sports Physiol Perform; 2016 Jan; 11(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 25932750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Optimal loading for maximal power output during lower-body resistance exercises.
    Cormie P; McCaulley GO; Triplett NT; McBride JM
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2007 Feb; 39(2):340-9. PubMed ID: 17277599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Determination of optimal loading during the power clean, in collegiate athletes.
    Comfort P; Fletcher C; McMahon JJ
    J Strength Cond Res; 2012 Nov; 26(11):2970-4. PubMed ID: 22190161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Kinetic and kinematic patterns during high intensity clean movement: searching for optimal load.
    Ammar A; Riemann BL; Masmoudi L; Blaumann M; Abdelkarim O; Hökelmann A
    J Sports Sci; 2018 Jun; 36(12):1319-1330. PubMed ID: 28895467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Peak power, ground reaction forces, and velocity during the squat exercise performed at different loads.
    Zink AJ; Perry AC; Robertson BL; Roach KE; Signorile JF
    J Strength Cond Res; 2006 Aug; 20(3):658-64. PubMed ID: 16937981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Can the Velocity of a 1RM Hang Power Clean Be Used to Estimate a 1RM Hang High Pull?
    Suchomel TJ; Techmanski BS; Kissick CR; Comfort P
    J Strength Cond Res; 2024 Jul; 38(7):1321-1325. PubMed ID: 38900178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of the Power Output Between the Hang Power Clean and Hang High Pull Across a Wide Range of Loads in Weightlifters.
    Takei S; Hirayama K; Okada J
    J Strength Cond Res; 2021 Feb; 35(Suppl 1):S84-S88. PubMed ID: 32149888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Redistributing load using wearable resistance during power clean training improves athletic performance.
    Marriner CR; Cronin JB; Macadam P; Storey A
    Eur J Sport Sci; 2017 Oct; 17(9):1101-1109. PubMed ID: 28792857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of loading on kinematic and kinetic variables during the midthigh clean pull.
    Comfort P; Udall R; Jones PA
    J Strength Cond Res; 2012 May; 26(5):1208-14. PubMed ID: 22516901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. No kinetic differences during variations of the power clean in inexperienced female collegiate athletes.
    Comfort P; McMahon JJ; Fletcher C
    J Strength Cond Res; 2013 Feb; 27(2):363-8. PubMed ID: 22465991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Comparison of Kinetic and Kinematic Variables During the Pull From the Knee and Hang Pull, Across Loads.
    Meechan D; McMahon JJ; Suchomel TJ; Comfort P
    J Strength Cond Res; 2020 Jul; 34(7):1819-1829. PubMed ID: 32282627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mechanical Demands of the Hang Power Clean and Jump Shrug: A Joint-Level Perspective.
    Kipp K; Malloy PJ; Smith JC; Giordanelli MD; Kiely MT; Geiser CF; Suchomel TJ
    J Strength Cond Res; 2018 Feb; 32(2):466-474. PubMed ID: 27669182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Optimal loading for peak power output during the hang power clean in professional rugby players.
    Kilduff LP; Bevan H; Owen N; Kingsley MI; Bunce P; Bennett M; Cunningham D
    Int J Sports Physiol Perform; 2007 Sep; 2(3):260-9. PubMed ID: 19168926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Within- and between-session reliability of power, force, and rate of force development during the power clean.
    Comfort P
    J Strength Cond Res; 2013 May; 27(5):1210-4. PubMed ID: 22843043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Improvement of Kinetic, Kinematic, and Qualitative Performance Variables of the Power Clean With the Hook Grip.
    Oranchuk DJ; Drinkwater EJ; Lindsay RS; Helms ER; Harbour ET; Storey AG
    Int J Sports Physiol Perform; 2019 Mar; 14(3):378-384. PubMed ID: 30204518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.