770 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24968640)
1. An assessment of late fixed functional treatment and the stability of Forsus appliance effects.
Gao W; Li X; Bai Y
Aust Orthod J; 2014 May; 30(1):2-10. PubMed ID: 24968640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Maxillary molar distalization or mandibular enhancement: a cephalometric comparison of comprehensive orthodontic treatment including the pendulum and the Herbst appliances.
Burkhardt DR; McNamara JA; Baccetti T
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Feb; 123(2):108-16. PubMed ID: 12594414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dental and skeletal changes in patients with mandibular retrognathism following treatment with Herbst and pre-adjusted fixed appliance.
de Abreu Vigorito F; Dominguez GC; de Arruda Aidar LA
Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 24713559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Maxillary molar distalization with the indirect Palatal miniscrew for Anchorage and Distalization Appliance (iPANDA).
Suzuki EY; Suzuki B
Orthodontics (Chic.); 2013; 14(1):e228-41. PubMed ID: 23646335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Forsus Nitinol Flat Spring and Jasper Jumper corrections of Class II division 1 malocclusions.
Karacay S; Akin E; Olmez H; Gurton AU; Sagdic D
Angle Orthod; 2006 Jul; 76(4):666-72. PubMed ID: 16808575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dentoskeletal effects of the Bite-Jumping Appliance and the Twin-Block Appliance in the treatment of skeletal Class II malocclusion: a randomized controlled trial.
Burhan AS; Nawaya FR
Eur J Orthod; 2015 Jun; 37(3):330-7. PubMed ID: 25296729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Soft tissue, skeletal and dentoalveolar changes following conventional anchorage molar distalization therapy in class II non-growing subjects: a multicentric retrospective study.
Fontana M; Cozzani M; Caprioglio A
Prog Orthod; 2012 May; 13(1):30-41. PubMed ID: 22583585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mechanisms of Class II correction induced by the crown Herbst appliance as a single-phase Class II therapy: 1 year follow-up.
Jakobsone G; Latkauskiene D; McNamara JA
Prog Orthod; 2013 Sep; 14():27. PubMed ID: 24326090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Molar distalization with a pendulum appliance K-loop combination.
Acar AG; Gürsoy S; Dinçer M
Eur J Orthod; 2010 Aug; 32(4):459-65. PubMed ID: 20231213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of the effects of skeletal anchoraged Forsus FRD using miniplates inserted on mandibular symphysis: A new approach for the treatment of Class II malocclusion.
Unal T; Celikoglu M; Candirli C
Angle Orthod; 2015 May; 85(3):413-9. PubMed ID: 25279724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dental and skeletal components of Class II open bite treatment with a modified Thurow appliance.
Jacob HB; dos Santos-Pinto A; Buschang PH
Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 24713556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of maxillary molar distalization with the distal jet: a comparison with other contemporary methods.
Bolla E; Muratore F; Carano A; Bowman SJ
Angle Orthod; 2002 Oct; 72(5):481-94. PubMed ID: 12401059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cephalometric comparison of vertical changes between Begg and preadjusted edgewise appliances.
Chhibber A; Upadhyay M; Shetty VS; Mogra S
Eur J Orthod; 2011 Dec; 33(6):712-20. PubMed ID: 21436189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Skeletal Class II treatment with Twin Force Bite Corrector: case reports.
Altuğ-Ataç AT; Dalcı ÖN; Memikoğlu UT
World J Orthod; 2008; 9(3):e7-17. PubMed ID: 19641763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An active, skeletally anchored transpalatal appliance for derotation, distalization and vertical control of maxillary first molars.
Hourfar J; Ludwig B; Kanavakis G
J Orthod; 2014 Sep; 41 Suppl 1():S24-32. PubMed ID: 25138362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Treatment response to maxillary expansion and protraction.
Ngan P; Hägg U; Yiu C; Merwin D; Wei SH
Eur J Orthod; 1996 Apr; 18(2):151-68. PubMed ID: 8670927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Treatment effects of a fixed intermaxillary device to correct class II malocclusions in growing patients.
Heinrichs DA; Shammaa I; Martin C; Razmus T; Gunel E; Ngan P
Prog Orthod; 2014; 15(1):45. PubMed ID: 25138988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mandibular incisor position changes in relation to amount of bite jumping during Herbst/multibracket appliance treatment: a radiographic-cephalometric study.
Martin J; Pancherz H
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 19577147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cephalometric appraisal of Class II treatment effects after functional and fixed appliances: a retrospective study.
Zelderloo A; Cadenas de Llano-Pérula M; Verdonck A; Fieuws S; Willems G
Eur J Orthod; 2017 Jun; 39(3):334-341. PubMed ID: 27742730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of 2 comprehensive Class II treatment protocols including the bonded Herbst and headgear appliances: a double-blind study of consecutively treated patients at puberty.
Baccetti T; Franchi L; Stahl F
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jun; 135(6):698.e1-10; discussion 698-9. PubMed ID: 19524823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
