BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

420 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24969407)

  • 1. Strain characteristics of Marburg double crown-retained implant overdentures compared with bar and ball-retained implant overdentures, with and without a rigid major connector.
    Kazokoğlu FŞ; Akaltan F
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Dec; 112(6):1416-24. PubMed ID: 24969407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of the number of supporting implants on mandibular photoelastic models with different implant-retained overdenture designs.
    Celik G; Uludag B
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Jul; 23(5):374-80. PubMed ID: 24417330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of number and distribution of unsplinted maxillary implants on the load transfer in implant-retained maxillary overdentures: an in vitro study.
    Damghani S; Masri R; Driscoll CF; Romberg E
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Jun; 107(6):358-65. PubMed ID: 22633591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Load Transfer Characteristics of Various Designs of Three-Implant-Retained Mandibular Overdentures.
    Tokar E; Uludag B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(5):1061-7. PubMed ID: 26394342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of retention and stability of two implant-retained overdentures based on implant location.
    Scherer MD; McGlumphy EA; Seghi RR; Campagni WV
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):515-21. PubMed ID: 24819528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bone strains around immediately loaded implants supporting mandibular overdentures in human cadavers.
    Akça K; Akkocaoglu M; Cömert A; Tekdemir I; Cehreli MC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(1):101-9. PubMed ID: 17340903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A 3-year prospective clinical study of telescopic crown, bar, and locator attachments for removable four implant-supported maxillary overdentures.
    Zou D; Wu Y; Huang W; Wang F; Wang S; Zhang Z; Zhang Z
    Int J Prosthodont; 2013; 26(6):566-73. PubMed ID: 24179972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Load Transfer Characteristics of Three-Implant-Retained Overdentures with Different Interimplant Distances.
    Tokar E; Uludag B; Karacaer O
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017; 32(2):363-371. PubMed ID: 28291854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of Rigid Bar and Nonrigid Double Crown Attachments on Maxillary Implant Overdentures: An In Vitro Study with Differential Bone Quality.
    Kimura T; Yang TC; Maeda Y
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(6):764-769. PubMed ID: 30024991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Photoelastic stress analysis of various retention mechanisms on 3-implant-retained mandibular overdentures.
    Celik G; Uludag B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Apr; 97(4):229-35. PubMed ID: 17499093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Photoelastic analysis of the effect of palatal support on various implant-supported overdenture designs.
    Ochiai KT; Williams BH; Hojo S; Nishimura R; Caputo AA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 May; 91(5):421-7. PubMed ID: 15153848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of attachment design on strains around implants supporting overdentures.
    Cekiç C; Akça K; Cehreli MC
    Quintessence Int; 2007 Jun; 38(6):e291-7. PubMed ID: 17625616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Changes in the edentulous maxilla with ball and telescopic attachments of implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a 4-year retrospective study.
    Elsyad MA; Khairallah AS; Shawky AF
    Quintessence Int; 2013 Jul; 44(7):487-95. PubMed ID: 23616978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with ball or telescopic crown attachments: a 3-year prospective study.
    Krennmair G; Weinländer M; Krainhöfner M; Piehslinger E
    Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(2):164-70. PubMed ID: 16602365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of reinforcement on strains within maxillary implant overdentures.
    Takahashi T; Gonda T; Maeda Y
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(6):1327-32. PubMed ID: 26478980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Complications with computer-aided designed/computer-assisted manufactured titanium and soldered gold bars for mandibular implant-overdentures: short-term observations.
    Katsoulis J; Wälchli J; Kobel S; Gholami H; Mericske-Stern R
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Jan; 17 Suppl 1():e75-85. PubMed ID: 23915228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Double crown-retained maxillary overdentures: 5-year follow-up.
    Frisch E; Ziebolz D; Ratka-Krüger P; Rinke S
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Feb; 17(1):22-31. PubMed ID: 23679159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of Reinforcement on Denture Strain in Maxillary Implant Overdentures: An In Vitro Study Under Various Implant Configurations.
    Takahashi T; Gonda T; Maeda Y
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(6):e162-e167. PubMed ID: 27861659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Attachment of clips in a bar-retained maxillary implant overdenture: a clinical report.
    Slot W; Raghoebar GM; van Dijk G; Meijer HJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Jun; 107(6):353-7. PubMed ID: 22633590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Rehabilitation of the edentulous maxilla complicated by combination syndrome with an implant overdenture: a case report.
    Piermatti J
    Gen Dent; 2013 Aug; 61(5):64-9. PubMed ID: 23928443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.