These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24969603)

  • 1. [Reconstruction plates to bridge mandibular defects: indication and key points].
    Zhang L
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2014 Apr; 49(4):250-3. PubMed ID: 24969603
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Aesthetically successful mandibular reconstruction with a single reconstruction plate.
    Kroll SS; Reece GP
    Clin Plast Surg; 2001 Apr; 28(2):273-82. PubMed ID: 11400821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mandibular reconstruction using bone morphogenetic protein 2: long-term follow-up in a canine model.
    Toriumi DM; O'Grady K; Horlbeck DM; Desai D; Turek TJ; Wozney J
    Laryngoscope; 1999 Sep; 109(9):1481-9. PubMed ID: 10499059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reconstruction of large defects postmandibulectomy for oral cancer using plates and myocutaneous flaps: a long-term follow-up.
    Mariani PB; Kowalski LP; Magrin J
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 May; 35(5):427-32. PubMed ID: 16442779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mandible reconstruction with patient-specific pre-bent reconstruction plates: comparison of a transfer key method to the standard method--results of an in vitro study.
    Wilde F; Plail M; Riese C; Schramm A; Winter K
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2012 Jan; 7(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 21594568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mandible reconstruction using patient-specific pre-bent reconstruction plates: comparison of standard and transfer key methods.
    Wilde F; Winter K; Kletsch K; Lorenz K; Schramm A
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2015 Feb; 10(2):129-40. PubMed ID: 24810111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reconstruction of the mandibular ramus/condyle unit following resection of benign and aggressive lesions of the mandible.
    Pogrel MA; Schmidt BL
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Apr; 65(4):801-4. PubMed ID: 17368384
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Titanium mesh fracture in mandibular reconstruction.
    Aytaç S; Ozbek S; Kahveci R; Ozgenel Y; Akin S; Ozcan M
    J Craniofac Surg; 2005 Nov; 16(6):1120-2. PubMed ID: 16327566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The fitting accuracy of pre-bend reconstruction plates and their impact on the temporomandibular joint.
    Wurm MC; Hagen J; Nkenke E; Neukam FW; Schlittenbauer T
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2019 Jan; 47(1):53-59. PubMed ID: 30470467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In situ-generated vascularized fibula free flap for the reconstruction of complete mandibular defects.
    González-García R; Muñoz-Guerra MF; Rodríguez-Campo FJ; Naval-Gías L
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2006 May; 117(6):2094-5. PubMed ID: 16652007
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mandibular reconstruction in adults: a review.
    Goh BT; Lee S; Tideman H; Stoelinga PJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Jul; 37(7):597-605. PubMed ID: 18450424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Feasibility of alloplastic mandibular reconstruction in patients following removal of oral squamous cell carcinoma.
    Ettl T; Driemel O; Dresp BV; Reichert TE; Reuther J; Pistner H
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2010 Jul; 38(5):350-4. PubMed ID: 19501515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reconstruction plates to bridge mandibular defects: a clinical and experimental investigation in biomechanical aspects.
    Yi Z; Jian-Guo Z; Guang-Yan Y; Ling L; Fu-Yun Z; Guo-Cheng Z
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1999 Dec; 28(6):445-50. PubMed ID: 10609746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Complications after reconstruction by plate and soft-tissue free flap in composite mandibular defects and secondary salvage reconstruction with osteocutaneous flap.
    Wei FC; Celik N; Yang WG; Chen IH; Chang YM; Chen HC
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2003 Jul; 112(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 12832874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Temporary mandibular stabilisation during reconstruction: an alternative technique.
    Mohindra A; Blanco-Guzman MM
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Jul; 47(5):399-400. PubMed ID: 19027999
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Overview and perspective of mandibular reconstruction].
    Zwetyenga N
    Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 2009 Jun; 110(3):185-7. PubMed ID: 19403147
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biomechanics of mandibular reconstruction: a review.
    Wong RC; Tideman H; Kin L; Merkx MA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Apr; 39(4):313-9. PubMed ID: 19944568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reconstruction of the mandible using preshaped 2.3-mm titanium plates, autogenous cortical bone plates, particulate cancellous bone, and platelet-rich plasma: a retrospective analysis of 20 patients.
    Mooren RE; Merkx MA; Kessler PA; Jansen JA; Stoelinga PJ
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Oct; 68(10):2459-67. PubMed ID: 20633974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of miniplates and reconstruction plates in fibular flap reconstruction of the mandible.
    Robey AB; Spann ML; McAuliff TM; Meza JL; Hollins RR; Johnson PJ
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2008 Dec; 122(6):1733-1738. PubMed ID: 19050525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The feasibility of rib grafts in long span mandibular defects reconstruction: A long term follow up.
    Habib AMA; Hassan SA
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2019 Jan; 47(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 30522796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.