1138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24969660)
1. Toward a computational framework for cognitive biology: unifying approaches from cognitive neuroscience and comparative cognition.
Fitch WT
Phys Life Rev; 2014 Sep; 11(3):329-64. PubMed ID: 24969660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Implementation is crucial but must be neurobiologically grounded. Comment on "Toward a computational framework for cognitive biology: unifying approaches from cognitive neuroscience and comparative cognition" by W. Tecumseh Fitch.
Bornkessel-Schlesewsky I; Schlesewsky M; Small SL
Phys Life Rev; 2014 Sep; 11(3):365-6. PubMed ID: 24957290
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Decomposing dendrophilia. Comment on "Toward a computational framework for cognitive biology: unifying approaches from cognitive neuroscience and comparative cognition" by W. Tecumseh Fitch.
Honing H; Zuidema W
Phys Life Rev; 2014 Sep; 11(3):375-6. PubMed ID: 24998340
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Rethinking the cognitive revolution from a neural perspective: how overuse/misuse of the term 'cognition' and the neglect of affective controls in behavioral neuroscience could be delaying progress in understanding the BrainMind.
Cromwell HC; Panksepp J
Neurosci Biobehav Rev; 2011 Oct; 35(9):2026-35. PubMed ID: 21345347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cognitive theory and brain fact: insights for the future of cognitive neuroscience. Comment on "Toward a computational framework for cognitive biology: unifying approaches from cognitive neuroscience and comparative cognition" by W. Tecumseh Fitch.
Bowling D
Phys Life Rev; 2014 Sep; 11(3):377-9. PubMed ID: 25089022
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Evolutionary basis for human language. Comment on "Toward a computational framework for cognitive biology: unifying approaches from cognitive neuroscience and comparative cognition" by Tecumseh Fitch.
Steedman M
Phys Life Rev; 2014 Sep; 11(3):382-8. PubMed ID: 25074443
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Representations, approximations, and limitations within a computational framework for cognitive science. Comment on "Toward a computational framework for cognitive biology: Unifying approaches from cognitive neuroscience and comparative cognition" by W. Tecumseh Fitch.
Perfors A
Phys Life Rev; 2014 Sep; 11(3):369-70. PubMed ID: 24954729
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Parallel Distributed Processing at 25: further explorations in the microstructure of cognition.
Rogers TT; McClelland JL
Cogn Sci; 2014 Aug; 38(6):1024-77. PubMed ID: 25087578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Learning, epigenetics, and computation: an extension on Fitch's proposal. Comment on "Toward a computational framework for cognitive biology: unifying approaches from cognitive neuroscience and comparative cognition" by W. Tecumseh Fitch.
Okanoya K
Phys Life Rev; 2014 Sep; 11(3):389-90. PubMed ID: 25027505
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Brains are not just neurons. Comment on "Toward a computational framework for cognitive biology: unifying approaches from cognitive neuroscience and comparative cognition" by Fitch.
Huber L
Phys Life Rev; 2014 Sep; 11(3):373-4. PubMed ID: 24908289
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Beyond single-level accounts: the role of cognitive architectures in cognitive scientific explanation.
Cooper RP; Peebles D
Top Cogn Sci; 2015 Apr; 7(2):243-58. PubMed ID: 25726919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Attending to the forest and the trees. Reply to comments on "Toward a computational framework for cognitive biology: unifying approaches from cognitive neuroscience and comparative cognition".
Fitch WT
Phys Life Rev; 2014 Sep; 11(3):391-9. PubMed ID: 25112825
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Naturalizing cognition: the integration of cognitive science and biology.
Glenberg AM
Curr Biol; 2006 Sep; 16(18):R802-4. PubMed ID: 16979548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The forest for the trees. Comment on "Toward a computational framework for cognitive biology: unifying approaches from cognitive neuroscience and comparative cognition" by W.T. Fitch.
Johnson M
Phys Life Rev; 2014 Sep; 11(3):371-2. PubMed ID: 25027504
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The software/wetware distinction. Comment on "Toward a computational framework for cognitive biology: unifying approaches from cognitive neuroscience and comparative cognition" by W. Tecumseh Fitch.
Dennett D
Phys Life Rev; 2014 Sep; 11(3):367-8. PubMed ID: 24998042
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Empiricists are from Venus, modelers are from Mars: Reconciling experimental and computational approaches in cognitive neuroscience.
Cowell RA; Bussey TJ; Saksida LM
Neurosci Biobehav Rev; 2012 Nov; 36(10):2371-9. PubMed ID: 22960226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Beyond the "Conceptual Nervous System": Can computational cognitive neuroscience transform learning theory?
Soto FA
Behav Processes; 2019 Oct; 167():103908. PubMed ID: 31381986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cognitive computational neuroscience.
Kriegeskorte N; Douglas PK
Nat Neurosci; 2018 Sep; 21(9):1148-1160. PubMed ID: 30127428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Modeling developmental cognitive neuroscience.
Westermann G; Sirois S; Shultz TR; Mareschal D
Trends Cogn Sci; 2006 May; 10(5):227-32. PubMed ID: 16603407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Preface to the special issue: computational cognitive neuroscience.
Becker S
Brain Res; 2008 Apr; 1202():1-2. PubMed ID: 17658487
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
