1159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24970897)
1. Effect of time-of-flight technique on the diagnostic performance of 18F-FDG PET/CT for assessment of lymph node metastases in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.
Li CY; Klohr S; Sadick H; Weiss C; Hoermann K; Schoenberg SO; Sadick M
J Nucl Med Technol; 2014 Sep; 42(3):181-7. PubMed ID: 24970897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of partial volume correction in staging of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma using PET/CT.
Fayad H; Le Pogam A; Lamare F; Fernandez P; Pradier O; Valette G; Visvikis D; Cheze Le Rest C
Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2014 Sep; 58(3):319-28. PubMed ID: 25265252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of reconstruction parameters in high-definition PET/CT on assessment of lymph node metastases in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.
Sadick M; Molina F; Frey S; Piniol R; Sadick H; Brade J; Fink C; Schoenberg SO; He Y
J Nucl Med Technol; 2013 Mar; 41(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 23365259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Can 3'-Deoxy-3'-((18)F) Fluorothymidine Out Perform 2-Deoxy-2-((18)F) Fluoro-D-Glucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in the Diagnosis of Cervical Lymphadenopathy in Patients With Oral/Head and Neck Cancer?
Schaefferkoetter JD; Carlson ER; Heidel RE
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Jul; 73(7):1420-8. PubMed ID: 25869746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake level-based lymph node staging in oropharyngeal squamous cell cancer--role of molecular marker expression on diagnostic outcome.
Sadick M; Weiss C; Piniol R; Frey S; Hoermann K; Schoenberg SO; Sadick H
Oncol Res Treat; 2015; 38(1-2):16-22. PubMed ID: 25633529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. FDG PET/MR for lymph node staging in head and neck cancer.
Platzek I; Beuthien-Baumann B; Schneider M; Gudziol V; Kitzler HH; Maus J; Schramm G; Popp M; Laniado M; Kotzerke J; van den Hoff J
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Jul; 83(7):1163-1168. PubMed ID: 24746792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Metabolic Tumor Volume on 18F-FDG PET/CT Improves Preoperative Identification of High-Risk Endometrial Carcinoma Patients.
Husby JA; Reitan BC; Biermann M; Trovik J; Bjørge L; Magnussen IJ; Salvesen ØO; Salvesen HB; Haldorsen IS
J Nucl Med; 2015 Aug; 56(8):1191-8. PubMed ID: 26045311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The value of preoperative 18F-FDG PET/CT for the assessing contralateral neck in head and neck cancer patients with unilateral node metastasis (N1-3).
Joo YH; Yoo IR; Cho KJ; Park JO; Nam IC; Kim CS; Kim SY; Kim MS
Clin Otolaryngol; 2014 Dec; 39(6):338-44. PubMed ID: 25102759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Preoperative Contrast-Enhanced CT Versus ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT Evaluation and the Prognostic Value of Extranodal Extension for Surgical Patients with Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.
Lee JR; Choi YJ; Roh JL; Kim JS; Lee JH; Cho KJ; Choi SH; Nam SY; Kim SY
Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Dec; 22 Suppl 3():S1020-7. PubMed ID: 26122372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. 18F-FDG PET and CT/MRI in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective study of 124 patients with histologic correlation.
Ng SH; Yen TC; Liao CT; Chang JT; Chan SC; Ko SF; Wang HM; Wong HF
J Nucl Med; 2005 Jul; 46(7):1136-43. PubMed ID: 16000282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prospective comparison of 18F-FDG PET with conventional imaging modalities (CT, MRI, US) in lymph node staging of head and neck cancer.
Adams S; Baum RP; Stuckensen T; Bitter K; Hör G
Eur J Nucl Med; 1998 Sep; 25(9):1255-60. PubMed ID: 9724374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prediction of ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration cytology results by FDG PET-CT for lymph node metastases in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients.
Peltenburg B; de Keizer B; Dankbaar JW; de Boer M; Willems SM; Philippens MEP; Terhaard CHJ; de Bree R
Acta Oncol; 2018 Dec; 57(12):1687-1692. PubMed ID: 30489180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Utility of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in identifying penile squamous cell carcinoma metastatic lymph nodes.
Rosevear HM; Williams H; Collins M; Lightfoot AJ; Coleman T; Brown JA
Urol Oncol; 2012 Sep; 30(5):723-6. PubMed ID: 21396850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. ¹⁸F-FDG-PET imaging in radiotherapy tumor volume delineation in treatment of head and neck cancer.
Delouya G; Igidbashian L; Houle A; Bélair M; Boucher L; Cohade C; Beaulieu S; Filion EJ; Coulombe G; Hinse M; Martel C; Després P; Nguyen-Tan PF
Radiother Oncol; 2011 Dec; 101(3):362-8. PubMed ID: 21885143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Combination of FDG PET/CT and contrast-enhanced MSCT in detecting lymph node metastasis of esophageal cancer.
Tan R; Yao SZ; Huang ZQ; Li J; Li X; Tan HH; Liu QW
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(18):7719-24. PubMed ID: 25292052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [(18)F]-FDG PET/CT imaging for detection of nodal metastases in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the pharynx and larynx: comparison with CT.
Suenaga Y; Kitajima K; Kanda T; Otsuki N; Nibu K; Sasaki R; Itoh T; Sugimura K
Jpn J Radiol; 2016 Mar; 34(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 26670594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Utility of SUV
Lim RS; Ramdave S; Beech P; Billah B; Karim MN; Smith JA; Safdar A; Sigston E
Cancer Imaging; 2016 Nov; 16(1):39. PubMed ID: 27821180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. FDG-PET/contrast-enhanced CT as a post-treatment tool in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: comparison with FDG-PET/non-contrast-enhanced CT and contrast-enhanced CT.
Suenaga Y; Kitajima K; Ishihara T; Sasaki R; Otsuki N; Nibu K; Minamikawa T; Kiyota N; Sugimura K
Eur Radiol; 2016 Apr; 26(4):1018-30. PubMed ID: 26188656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. 18F-FDG-PET/CT for the assessment of the contralateral neck in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.
Kastrinidis N; Kuhn FP; Hany TF; Ahmad N; Huber GF; Haerle SK
Laryngoscope; 2013 May; 123(5):1210-5. PubMed ID: 23426442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The use of multiple time point dynamic positron emission tomography/computed tomography in patients with oral/head and neck cancer does not predictably identify metastatic cervical lymph nodes.
Carlson ER; Schaefferkoetter J; Townsend D; McCoy JM; Campbell PD; Long M
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Jan; 71(1):162-77. PubMed ID: 22742956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
