These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. High incidence of non-random template strand segregation and asymmetric fate determination in dividing stem cells and their progeny. Conboy MJ; Karasov AO; Rando TA PLoS Biol; 2007 May; 5(5):e102. PubMed ID: 17439301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evolutionary dynamics of adult stem cells: comparison of random and immortal-strand segregation mechanisms. Tannenbaum E; Sherley JL; Shakhnovich EI Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2005 Apr; 71(4 Pt 1):041914. PubMed ID: 15903708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cancer stem cells. Soltysova A; Altanerova V; Altaner C Neoplasma; 2005; 52(6):435-40. PubMed ID: 16284686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. New cancer diagnostics and therapeutics from a ninth 'hallmark of cancer': symmetric self-renewal by mutated distributed stem cells. Sherley JL Expert Rev Mol Diagn; 2013 Nov; 13(8):797-810. PubMed ID: 24151848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Asymmetric cell division and template DNA co-segregation in cancer stem cells. Pine SR; Liu W Front Oncol; 2014; 4():226. PubMed ID: 25191642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biased DNA segregation in Drosophila male germline stem cells. Yamashita YM Semin Cell Dev Biol; 2013; 24(8-9):618-26. PubMed ID: 23707893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Asymmetric cell divisions and asymmetric cell fates. Tajbakhsh S; Rocheteau P; Le Roux I Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol; 2009; 25():671-99. PubMed ID: 19575640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The immortal strand hypothesis: segregation and reconstruction. Rando TA Cell; 2007 Jun; 129(7):1239-43. PubMed ID: 17604710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Asymmetric chromatid segregation in cardiac progenitor cells is enhanced by Pim-1 kinase. Sundararaman B; Avitabile D; Konstandin MH; Cottage CT; Gude N; Sussman MA Circ Res; 2012 Apr; 110(9):1169-73. PubMed ID: 22441844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Stem cell identity and template DNA strand segregation. Tajbakhsh S Curr Opin Cell Biol; 2008 Dec; 20(6):716-22. PubMed ID: 18996191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Support for the immortal strand hypothesis: neural stem cells partition DNA asymmetrically in vitro. Karpowicz P; Morshead C; Kam A; Jervis E; Ramunas J; Cheng V; van der Kooy D J Cell Biol; 2005 Aug; 170(5):721-32. PubMed ID: 16115957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The C. elegans engrailed homolog ceh-16 regulates the self-renewal expansion division of stem cell-like seam cells. Huang X; Tian E; Xu Y; Zhang H Dev Biol; 2009 Sep; 333(2):337-47. PubMed ID: 19607822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Immortal strands? Give me a break. Lansdorp PM Cell; 2007 Jun; 129(7):1244-7. PubMed ID: 17604711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Drosophila male germline stem cells do not asymmetrically segregate chromosome strands. Yadlapalli S; Cheng J; Yamashita YM J Cell Sci; 2011 Mar; 124(Pt 6):933-9. PubMed ID: 21325028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]