These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24972562)

  • 1. Impression formation of tests: retrospective judgments of performance are higher when easier questions come first.
    Jackson A; Greene RL
    Mem Cognit; 2014 Nov; 42(8):1325-32. PubMed ID: 24972562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Effect of information about normative difficulty of questions on level of confidence judgments and feeling of knowing judgments].
    Tanigami A
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2002 Aug; 73(3):243-50. PubMed ID: 12436883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of question order on evaluations of test performance: Can the bias dissolve?
    Bard G; Weinstein Y
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Oct; 70(10):2130-2140. PubMed ID: 27549082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Retrieval practice with short-answer, multiple-choice, and hybrid tests.
    Smith MA; Karpicke JD
    Memory; 2014; 22(7):784-802. PubMed ID: 24059563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The accuracy of meta-metacognitive judgments: regulating the realism of confidence.
    Buratti S; Allwood CM
    Cogn Process; 2012 Aug; 13(3):243-53. PubMed ID: 22476569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Retrospective bias in test performance: Providing easy items at the beginning of a test makes students believe they did better on it.
    Weinstein Y; Roediger HL
    Mem Cognit; 2010 Apr; 38(3):366-76. PubMed ID: 20234026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. When asking the question changes the ultimate answer: Metamemory judgments change memory.
    Mitchum AL; Kelley CM; Fox MC
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2016 Feb; 145(2):200-19. PubMed ID: 27045282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Rapid recollection of foresight judgments increases hindsight bias in a memory design.
    Calvillo DP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 May; 39(3):959-64. PubMed ID: 22582966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Question order bias in retrospective evaluations of item and associative recognition.
    Jackson A; Greene RL
    Memory; 2017 Apr; 25(4):481-486. PubMed ID: 27218857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stability in the metamemory realism of eyewitness confidence judgments.
    Buratti S; Allwood CM; Johansson M
    Cogn Process; 2014 Feb; 15(1):39-53. PubMed ID: 23812626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Competitive retrieval strategy causes multimodal response distributions in multiple-cue judgments.
    Albrecht R; Hoffmann JA; Pleskac TJ; Rieskamp J; von Helversen B
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Jun; 46(6):1064-1090. PubMed ID: 31750721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Metacognitive effects of initial question difficulty on subsequent memory performance.
    Pansky A; Goldsmith M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Oct; 21(5):1255-62. PubMed ID: 24557603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Explaining the forgetting bias effect on value judgments: The influence of memory for a past test.
    Rhodes MG; Witherby AE; Castel AD; Murayama K
    Mem Cognit; 2017 Apr; 45(3):362-374. PubMed ID: 27873187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A retrieval-based approach to eliminating hindsight bias.
    Van Boekel M; Varma K; Varma S
    Memory; 2017 Mar; 25(3):377-390. PubMed ID: 27108926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Metacognitive monitoring during criterion learning: when and why are judgments accurate?
    Pyc MA; Rawson KA; Aschenbrenner AJ
    Mem Cognit; 2014 Aug; 42(6):886-97. PubMed ID: 24643790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Optimizing multiple-choice tests as tools for learning.
    Little JL; Bjork EL
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Jan; 43(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 25123774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How "none of the above" (NOTA) affects the accessibility of tested and related information in multiple-choice questions.
    Blendermann MF; Little JL; Gray KM
    Memory; 2020 Apr; 28(4):473-480. PubMed ID: 32106781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. When disfluency is--and is not--a desirable difficulty: the influence of typeface clarity on metacognitive judgments and memory.
    Yue CL; Castel AD; Bjork RA
    Mem Cognit; 2013 Feb; 41(2):229-41. PubMed ID: 22976883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On the importance of looking back: the role of recursive remindings in recency judgments and cued recall.
    Jacoby LL; Wahlheim CN
    Mem Cognit; 2013 Jul; 41(5):625-37. PubMed ID: 23371792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Children's strategic regulation, metacognitive monitoring, and control processes during test taking.
    Krebs SS; Roebers CM
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2010 Sep; 80(Pt 3):325-40. PubMed ID: 20100399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.