166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24972979)
1. Kinematic study of the relation between the instantaneous center of rotation and degenerative changes in the cervical intervertebral disc.
Liu B; Liu Z; VanHoof T; Kalala J; Zeng Z; Lin X
Eur Spine J; 2014 Nov; 23(11):2307-13. PubMed ID: 24972979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of cervical intervertebral disc degeneration on the motion path of instantaneous center of rotation at degenerated and adjacent segments: A finite element analysis.
Sang D; Du CF; Wu B; Cai XY; Cui W; Yuchi CX; Rong T; Sang H; Liu B
Comput Biol Med; 2021 Jul; 134():104426. PubMed ID: 33979732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Motion path of the instant center of rotation in the cervical spine during in vivo dynamic flexion-extension: implications for artificial disc design and evaluation of motion quality after arthrodesis.
Anderst W; Baillargeon E; Donaldson W; Lee J; Kang J
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 May; 38(10):E594-601. PubMed ID: 23429677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Six-degrees-of-freedom cervical spine range of motion during dynamic flexion-extension after single-level anterior arthrodesis: comparison with asymptomatic control subjects.
Anderst WJ; Lee JY; Donaldson WF; Kang JD
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Mar; 95(6):497-506. PubMed ID: 23515984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical comparison of single- and two-level cervical arthroplasty versus arthrodesis: effect on adjacent-level spinal kinematics.
Cunningham BW; Hu N; Zorn CM; McAfee PC
Spine J; 2010 Apr; 10(4):341-9. PubMed ID: 20362252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Posterior facet load changes in adjacent segments due to moderate and severe degeneration in C5-C6 disc: a poroelastic C3-T1 finite element model study.
Hussain M; Natarajan RN; Chaudhary G; An HS; Andersson GB
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2012 Jun; 25(4):218-25. PubMed ID: 22652989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Radiographic cervical spine degenerative findings: a study on a large population from age 18 to 97 years.
Tao Y; Galbusera F; Niemeyer F; Samartzis D; Vogele D; Wilke HJ
Eur Spine J; 2021 Feb; 30(2):431-443. PubMed ID: 33025192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Are the standard parameters of cervical spine alignment and range of motion related to age, sex, and cervical disc degeneration?
Liu B; Wu B; Van Hoof T; Okito JP; Liu Z; Zeng Z
J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Sep; 23(3):274-9. PubMed ID: 26091436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Kinematic analysis of cervical spine canal diameter and its association with grade of degeneration.
Jiang X; Chen D; Lou Y; Li Z
Eur Spine J; 2016 Jul; 25(7):2166-72. PubMed ID: 27236657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Kinematic analysis of the cervical spine following implantation of an artificial cervical disc.
Pickett GE; Rouleau JP; Duggal N
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Sep; 30(17):1949-54. PubMed ID: 16135984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Kinematic relationship between missed ligamentum flavum bulge and degenerative factors in the cervical spine.
Zhong G; Buser Z; Lao L; Yin R; Wang JC
Spine J; 2015 Oct; 15(10):2216-21. PubMed ID: 26096477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Predictability of severity of disc degeneration and disc protrusion using horizontal displacement of cervical dynamic radiographs: A retrospective comparison study with MRI.
Kim CH; Hwang JM; Park JS; Han S; Park D
Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Jun; 97(25):e11098. PubMed ID: 29924003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dynamic functional nucleus is a potential biomarker for structural degeneration in cervical spine discs.
LeVasseur CM; Wawrose R; Pitcairn S; Donaldson WF; Lee JY; Anderst WJ
J Orthop Res; 2019 Apr; 37(4):965-971. PubMed ID: 30747456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Locating the Instant Center of Rotation in the Subaxial Cervical Spine with Biplanar Fluoroscopy during
Kim SH; Ham DW; Lee JI; Park SW; Ko MJ; Koo SB; Song KS
Clin Orthop Surg; 2019 Dec; 11(4):482-489. PubMed ID: 31788173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ranges of Cervical Intervertebral Disc Deformation During an In Vivo Dynamic Flexion-Extension of the Neck.
Yu Y; Mao H; Li JS; Tsai TY; Cheng L; Wood KB; Li G; Cha TD
J Biomech Eng; 2017 Jun; 139(6):0645011-7. PubMed ID: 28334358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Intervertebral kinematics of the cervical spine before, during, and after high-velocity low-amplitude manipulation.
Anderst WJ; Gale T; LeVasseur C; Raj S; Gongaware K; Schneider M
Spine J; 2018 Dec; 18(12):2333-2342. PubMed ID: 30142458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison between sheep and human cervical spines: an anatomic, radiographic, bone mineral density, and biomechanical study.
Kandziora F; Pflugmacher R; Scholz M; Schnake K; Lucke M; Schröder R; Mittlmeier T
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 May; 26(9):1028-37. PubMed ID: 11337621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dimensional changes of the neuroforamina in subaxial cervical spine during in vivo dynamic flexion-extension.
Mao H; Driscoll SJ; Li JS; Li G; Wood KB; Cha TD
Spine J; 2016 Apr; 16(4):540-6. PubMed ID: 26681352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Long-term kinematic analysis of cervical spine after single-level implantation of Bryan cervical disc prosthesis.
Ryu WH; Kowalczyk I; Duggal N
Spine J; 2013 Jun; 13(6):628-34. PubMed ID: 23578991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The natural history of degenerative spondylolisthesis of the cervical spine with 2- to 7-year follow-up.
Park MS; Moon SH; Lee HM; Kim SW; Kim TH; Suh BK; Riew KD
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Feb; 38(4):E205-10. PubMed ID: 23169076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
