These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24973021)

  • 1. An objective measure of nutrition facts panel usage and nutrient quality of food choice.
    Nelson D; Graham D; Harnack L
    J Nutr Educ Behav; 2014; 46(6):589-94. PubMed ID: 24973021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Nutrition Label Viewing during a Food-Selection Task: Front-of-Package Labels vs Nutrition Facts Labels.
    Graham DJ; Heidrick C; Hodgin K
    J Acad Nutr Diet; 2015 Oct; 115(10):1636-46. PubMed ID: 25887785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Food shopping and label use behavior among high school-aged adolescents.
    McCullum C; Achterberg CL
    Adolescence; 1997; 32(125):181-97. PubMed ID: 9105500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Can front-of-pack labelling schemes guide healthier food choices? Australian shoppers' responses to seven labelling formats.
    Watson WL; Kelly B; Hector D; Hughes C; King L; Crawford J; Sergeant J; Chapman K
    Appetite; 2014 Jan; 72():90-7. PubMed ID: 24126243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improvements in recall and food choices using a graphical method to deliver information of select nutrients.
    Pratt NS; Ellison BD; Benjamin AS; Nakamura MT
    Nutr Res; 2016 Jan; 36(1):44-56. PubMed ID: 26773780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Location, location, location: eye-tracking evidence that consumers preferentially view prominently positioned nutrition information.
    Graham DJ; Jeffery RW
    J Am Diet Assoc; 2011 Nov; 111(11):1704-11. PubMed ID: 22027053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Potential problems with increasing serving sizes on the Nutrition Facts label.
    Dallas SK; Liu PJ; Ubel PA
    Appetite; 2015 Dec; 95():577-84. PubMed ID: 26278876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Attention mediates the effect of nutrition label information on consumers' choice. Evidence from a choice experiment involving eye-tracking.
    Bialkova S; Grunert KG; Juhl HJ; Wasowicz-Kirylo G; Stysko-Kunkowska M; van Trijp HC
    Appetite; 2014 May; 76():66-75. PubMed ID: 24503332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Nutrient-specific system versus full fact panel: Testing the benefits of nutrient-specific front-of-package labels in a student sample.
    Carter KA; González-Vallejo C
    Appetite; 2018 Jun; 125():512-526. PubMed ID: 29518468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of breakfast cereals with the current nutrition facts panel (NFP) and the Food and Drug Administration's NFP proposal.
    González-Vallejo C; Lavins BD
    Public Health Nutr; 2016 Apr; 19(6):1047-58. PubMed ID: 25900202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Food label use and its relation to dietary intake among US adults.
    Ollberding NJ; Wolf RL; Contento I
    J Am Diet Assoc; 2010 Aug; 110(8):1233-7. PubMed ID: 20656100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A randomized trial of calorie labeling on menus.
    Hammond D; Goodman S; Hanning R; Daniel S
    Prev Med; 2013 Dec; 57(6):860-6. PubMed ID: 24113263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Front-of-pack nutrition labels. Their effect on attention and choices when consumers have varying goals and time constraints.
    van Herpen E; Trijp HC
    Appetite; 2011 Aug; 57(1):148-60. PubMed ID: 21554909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Status of nutrition labeling, health claims, and nutrient content claims for processed foods: 1997 Food Label and Package Survey.
    Brecher SJ; Bender MM; Wilkening VL; McCabe NM; Anderson EM
    J Am Diet Assoc; 2000 Sep; 100(9):1057-62. PubMed ID: 11019354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Predicting visual attention to nutrition information on food products: the influence of motivation and ability.
    Turner MM; Skubisz C; Pandya SP; Silverman M; Austin LL
    J Health Commun; 2014 Sep; 19(9):1017-29. PubMed ID: 24555542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predictors of nutrition label viewing during food purchase decision making: an eye tracking investigation.
    Graham DJ; Jeffery RW
    Public Health Nutr; 2012 Feb; 15(2):189-97. PubMed ID: 21733280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluating the Impact of U.S. Food and Drug Administration-Proposed Nutrition Facts Label Changes on Young Adults' Visual Attention and Purchase Intentions.
    Graham DJ; Roberto CA
    Health Educ Behav; 2016 Aug; 43(4):389-98. PubMed ID: 27230269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sociodemographic differences in the comprehension of nutritional labels on food products.
    Sinclair S; Hammond D; Goodman S
    J Nutr Educ Behav; 2013; 45(6):767-72. PubMed ID: 23886777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Consumer perceptions of the Nutrition Facts table and front-of-pack nutrition rating systems.
    Emrich TE; Qi Y; Mendoza JE; Lou W; Cohen JE; L'abbé MR
    Appl Physiol Nutr Metab; 2014 Apr; 39(4):417-24. PubMed ID: 24669982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Study on knowledge, attitudes and use of the pre-packaged food nutrition labeling in Hangzhou supermarket consumers in 2010].
    Hong ZH; Wang SF; Liu M; Yang YP; Chen Y; Liu QM; Ren YJ; Lü J; Li LM
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Jul; 32(7):657-60. PubMed ID: 21933533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.