These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24973037)
1. Advocating for longitudinal follow-up of the health and welfare of egg donors. Woodriff M; Sauer MV; Klitzman R Fertil Steril; 2014 Sep; 102(3):662-6. PubMed ID: 24973037 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Investigating psychosocial attitudes, motivations and experiences of oocyte donors, recipients and egg sharers: a systematic review. Bracewell-Milnes T; Saso S; Bora S; Ismail AM; Al-Memar M; Hamed AH; Abdalla H; Thum MY Hum Reprod Update; 2016 Jun; 22(4):450-65. PubMed ID: 27016289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Multiplying recipients paired with oocyte donors optimizes the use of donated oocytes. de Ziegler D; de Mouzon J; Fauque P; Zanette M; Marszałek A; Blanchet V; Boissonas CC; Wolf JP; Chapron C Fertil Steril; 2011 Apr; 95(5):1633-8. PubMed ID: 21300342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The personal, interpersonal,and political issues of egg donation. Randal AE J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2004 Dec; 26(12):1087-90. PubMed ID: 15607045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Preliminary study on the experience of egg donors at the CHRU in Tours: Key features for future research]. Cormery E; Frapsauce C; Malmanche H Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2020 Apr; 48(4):366-373. PubMed ID: 32035169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sperm and oocyte donors' experiences of anonymous donation and subsequent contact with their donor offspring. Jadva V; Freeman T; Kramer W; Golombok S Hum Reprod; 2011 Mar; 26(3):638-45. PubMed ID: 21177310 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Attitudes of anonymous and identity-release oocyte donors towards future contact with donor offspring. Miettinen A; Rotkirch A; Suikkari AM; Söderström-Anttila V Hum Reprod; 2019 Apr; 34(4):672-678. PubMed ID: 30805634 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mixed opinions on egg sharing. Gleicher N Lancet; 2003 Nov; 362(9394):1502-3. PubMed ID: 14602456 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Anonymous oocyte donation: a follow-up analysis of donors' experiences. Jordan CB; Belar CD; Williams RS J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol; 2004 Jun; 25(2):145-51. PubMed ID: 15715037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Egg donation for stem cell research: ideas of surplus and deficit in Australian IVF patients' and reproductive donors' accounts. Waldby C; Carroll K Sociol Health Illn; 2012 May; 34(4):513-28. PubMed ID: 21951180 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Families created by gamete donation: follow-up at age 2. Golombok S; Jadva V; Lycett E; Murray C; Maccallum F Hum Reprod; 2005 Jan; 20(1):286-93. PubMed ID: 15539442 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Looking back: egg donors' retrospective evaluations of their motivations, expectations, and experiences during their first donation cycle. Kenney NJ; McGowan ML Fertil Steril; 2010 Feb; 93(2):455-66. PubMed ID: 19022427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Views of French oocyte donors at least 3 years after donation. Cordier C; Ducrocq B; Fry J; Catteau-Jonard S Reprod Biomed Online; 2020 Jun; 40(6):819-826. PubMed ID: 32295744 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The final option. Rowe T J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2011 Nov; 33(11):1087-1088. PubMed ID: 22082779 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Counselling couples and donors for oocyte donation: the decision to use either known or anonymous oocytes. Baetens P; Devroey P; Camus M; Van Steirteghem AC; Ponjaert-Kristoffersen I Hum Reprod; 2000 Feb; 15(2):476-84. PubMed ID: 10655327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]