324 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24973173)
1. The 25-gauge EUS-FNA needle: Good for on-site but poor for off-site evaluation? Results of a randomized trial.
Varadarajulu S; Bang JY; Holt BA; Hasan MK; Logue A; Hawes RH; Hebert-Magee S
Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Dec; 80(6):1056-63. PubMed ID: 24973173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: 22-gauge aspiration versus 25-gauge biopsy needles.
Yang MJ; Yim H; Hwang JC; Lee D; Kim YB; Lim SG; Kim SS; Kang JK; Yoo BM; Kim JH
BMC Gastroenterol; 2015 Sep; 15():122. PubMed ID: 26419845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Randomized trial comparing the 22-gauge aspiration and 22-gauge biopsy needles for EUS-guided sampling of solid pancreatic mass lesions.
Bang JY; Hebert-Magee S; Trevino J; Ramesh J; Varadarajulu S
Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Aug; 76(2):321-7. PubMed ID: 22658389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. High and low negative pressure suction techniques in EUS-guided fine-needle tissue acquisition by using 25-gauge needles: a multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled trial.
Kudo T; Kawakami H; Hayashi T; Yasuda I; Mukai T; Inoue H; Katanuma A; Kawakubo K; Ishiwatari H; Doi S; Yamada R; Maguchi H; Isayama H; Mitsuhashi T; Sakamoto N;
Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Dec; 80(6):1030-7.e1. PubMed ID: 24890422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A multicenter randomized trial comparing a 25-gauge EUS fine-needle aspiration device with a 20-gauge EUS fine-needle biopsy device.
van Riet PA; Larghi A; Attili F; Rindi G; Nguyen NQ; Ruszkiewicz A; Kitano M; Chikugo T; Aslanian H; Farrell J; Robert M; Adeniran A; Van Der Merwe S; Roskams T; Chang K; Lin F; Lee JG; Arcidiacono PG; Petrone M; Doglioni C; Iglesias-Garcia J; Abdulkader I; Giovannini M; Bories E; Poizat F; Santo E; Scapa E; Marmor S; Bucobo JC; Buscaglia JM; Heimann A; Wu M; Baldaque-Silva F; Moro CF; Erler NS; Biermann K; Poley JW; Cahen DL; Bruno MJ
Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Feb; 89(2):329-339. PubMed ID: 30367877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Randomized trial comparing the Franseen and Fork-tip needles for EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy sampling of solid pancreatic mass lesions.
Bang JY; Hebert-Magee S; Navaneethan U; Hasan MK; Hawes R; Varadarajulu S
Gastrointest Endosc; 2018 Jun; 87(6):1432-1438. PubMed ID: 29305893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. High single-pass diagnostic yield of a new 25-gauge core biopsy needle for EUS-guided FNA biopsy in solid pancreatic lesions.
Iwashita T; Nakai Y; Samarasena JB; Park DH; Zhang Z; Gu M; Lee JG; Chang KJ
Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Jun; 77(6):909-15. PubMed ID: 23433596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy sampling with a new core needle on the need for onsite cytopathologic assessment: a preliminary study.
Rodrigues-Pinto E; Jalaj S; Grimm IS; Baron TH
Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Dec; 84(6):1040-1046. PubMed ID: 27345131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Randomized Trial Comparing the Flexible 19G and 25G Needles for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration of Solid Pancreatic Mass Lesions.
Ramesh J; Bang JY; Hebert-Magee S; Trevino J; Eltoum I; Frost A; Hasan MK; Logue A; Hawes R; Varadarajulu S
Pancreas; 2015 Jan; 44(1):128-33. PubMed ID: 25232713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of a stylet on a histological specimen in EUS-guided fine-needle tissue acquisition by using 22-gauge needles: a multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled trial.
Abe Y; Kawakami H; Oba K; Hayashi T; Yasuda I; Mukai T; Isayama H; Ishiwatari H; Doi S; Nakashima M; Yamamoto N; Kuwatani M; Mitsuhashi T; Hasegawa T; Hirose Y; Yamada T; Tanaka M; Sakamoto N;
Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Nov; 82(5):837-844.e1. PubMed ID: 25936452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. 22-gauge core
Sterlacci W; Sioulas AD; Veits L; Gönüllü P; Schachschal G; Groth S; Anders M; Kontos CK; Topalidis T; Hinsch A; Vieth M; Rösch T; Denzer UW
World J Gastroenterol; 2016 Oct; 22(39):8820-8830. PubMed ID: 27818598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Specimen Collection and Evaluation Techniques Affect Diagnostic Accuracy.
Bang JY; Navaneethan U; Hasan MK; Hawes R; Varadarajulu S
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2018 Nov; 16(11):1820-1828.e4. PubMed ID: 29535060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. EUS-guided fine needle biopsy sampling using a novel fork-tip needle: a case-control study.
Kandel P; Tranesh G; Nassar A; Bingham R; Raimondo M; Woodward TA; Gomez V; Wallace MB
Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Dec; 84(6):1034-1039. PubMed ID: 27018087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Slow pull versus suction in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of pancreatic solid masses.
Nakai Y; Isayama H; Chang KJ; Yamamoto N; Hamada T; Uchino R; Mizuno S; Miyabayashi K; Yamamoto K; Kawakubo K; Kogure H; Sasaki T; Hirano K; Tanaka M; Tada M; Fukayama M; Koike K
Dig Dis Sci; 2014 Jul; 59(7):1578-85. PubMed ID: 24429514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Multicenter, prospective, crossover trial comparing the door-knocking method with the conventional method for EUS-FNA of solid pancreatic masses (with videos).
Mukai S; Itoi T; Ashida R; Tsuchiya T; Ikeuchi N; Kamada K; Tanaka R; Umeda J; Tonozuka R; Fukutake N; Hoshi K; Moriyasu F; Gotoda T; Irisawa A
Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Jun; 83(6):1210-7. PubMed ID: 26522372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Macroscopic on-site quality evaluation of biopsy specimens to improve the diagnostic accuracy during EUS-guided FNA using a 19-gauge needle for solid lesions: a single-center prospective pilot study (MOSE study).
Iwashita T; Yasuda I; Mukai T; Doi S; Nakashima M; Uemura S; Mabuchi M; Shimizu M; Hatano Y; Hara A; Moriwaki H
Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Jan; 81(1):177-85. PubMed ID: 25440688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the Diagnostic Performance of Newly Designed 21-Gauge and Standard 22-Gauge Aspiration Needles in Patients with Solid Pancreatic Masses.
Minaga K; Yoshikawa T; Yamashita Y; Akamatsu H; Ikenouchi M; Ishii T; Matsumoto H; Iwagami H; Nakatani Y; Hatamaru K; Takenaka M; Akamatsu T; Uenoyama Y; Watanabe T; Ono K; Chiba Y; Kudo M
Dig Dis Sci; 2019 Oct; 64(10):2982-2991. PubMed ID: 31011943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Factors affecting the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for upper gastrointestinal submucosal or extraluminal solid mass lesions.
Rong L; Kida M; Yamauchi H; Okuwaki K; Miyazawa S; Iwai T; Kikuchi H; Watanabe M; Imaizumi H; Koizumi W
Dig Endosc; 2012 Sep; 24(5):358-63. PubMed ID: 22925290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Core biopsy needle versus standard aspiration needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a randomized parallel-group study.
Lee YN; Moon JH; Kim HK; Choi HJ; Choi MH; Kim DC; Lee TH; Cha SW; Cho YD; Park SH
Endoscopy; 2014 Dec; 46(12):1056-62. PubMed ID: 25098611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Stylet slow-pull versus standard suction for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of solid pancreatic lesions: a multicenter randomized trial.
Saxena P; El Zein M; Stevens T; Abdelgelil A; Besharati S; Messallam A; Kumbhari V; Azola A; Brainard J; Shin EJ; Lennon AM; Canto MI; Singh VK; Khashab MA
Endoscopy; 2018 May; 50(5):497-504. PubMed ID: 29272906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
