220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24973310)
1. Correction factors kE and kQ for LiF-TLDs for dosimetry in megavoltage electron and photon beams.
Bruggmoser G; Saum R; Saum F; Gainey M; Pychlau C; Kapsch RP; Zink K
Z Med Phys; 2015 Jun; 25(2):186-91. PubMed ID: 24973310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Energy responses of the LiF series TL pellets to high-energy photons in the energy range from 1.25 to 21 MV.
Kim JL; Lee JI; Ji YH; Kim BH; Kim JS; Chang SY
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 119(1-4):353-6. PubMed ID: 16644960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Energy response of LiF and Mg2SiO4 TLDs to 10-150 keV monoenergetic photons.
Konnai A; Nariyama N; Ohnishi S; Odano N
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 115(1-4):334-6. PubMed ID: 16381741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dosimetry of densely ionising radiation with three LiF phosphors for space applications.
Bilski P
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 120(1-4):397-400. PubMed ID: 16731689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Response of LiF:Mg,Ti thermoluminescent dosimeters at photon energies relevant to the dosimetry of brachytherapy (<1 MeV).
Tedgren AC; Hedman A; Grindborg JE; Carlsson GA
Med Phys; 2011 Oct; 38(10):5539-50. PubMed ID: 21992372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comments on 'The thermoluminescence dose-response and other characteristics of the high-temperature TL in LiF: Mg.Ti (TLD-100)' by Y.S. Horowitz, L. Oster and H. Datz.
German U; Weinstein M; Abraham A; Alfassi ZB
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 128(4):509-10; author reply 510-5. PubMed ID: 18420571
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Determination of absorbed dose to water around a clinical HDR (192)Ir source using LiF:Mg,Ti TLDs demonstrates an LET dependence of detector response.
Carlsson Tedgren A; Elia R; Hedtjarn H; Olsson S; Alm Carlsson G
Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):1133-40. PubMed ID: 22320824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Energy response of a two-dimensional sheet-type LiF:Mg,Cu,P TL dosemeter to photons.
Konnai A; Nariyama N; Ohnishi S; Odano N; Ozasa N; Ishikawa Y
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 120(1-4):125-8. PubMed ID: 16614093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of the effects of exposure to light in Harshaw LiF:Mg,Ti and LiF:Mg,Cu,P.
Baker ST; Gilvin PJ
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):258-60. PubMed ID: 16980318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The response of lif thermoluminescence dosemeters to photon beams in the energy range from 30 kV x rays to 60Co gamma rays.
Davis SD; Ross CK; Mobit PN; Van der Zwan L; Chase WJ; Shortt KR
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2003; 106(1):33-43. PubMed ID: 14653324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Doses to LiF :Ti, Mg chips encapsulated in plastic extremity rings as a result of radon gas exposure.
Kearfott KJ; Noon EP; Rafique M
J Radiol Prot; 2015 Jun; 35(2):265-70. PubMed ID: 25785500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparative study on the susceptibility of LiF:Mg,Ti (TLD-100) and LiF:Mg,Cu,P (TLD-100H) to spurious signals in thermoluminescence dosimetry.
Al-Haj A; Lagarde C; Mahyoub F
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):399-402. PubMed ID: 17223633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Application of different TL detectors for the photon dosimetry in mixed radiation fields used for BNCT.
Burgkhardt B; Bilski P; Budzanowski M; Böttger R; Eberhardt K; Hampel G; Olko P; Straubing A
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 120(1-4):83-6. PubMed ID: 16644976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Energy correction factors of LiF powder TLDs irradiated in high-energy electron beams and applied to mailed dosimetry for quality assurance networks.
Marre D; Ferreira IH; Bridier A; Björeland A; Svensson H; Dutreix A; Chavaudra J
Phys Med Biol; 2000 Dec; 45(12):3657-74. PubMed ID: 11131191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) dosimetry using lithium formate in radiotherapy: comparison with thermoluminescence (TL) dosimetry using lithium fluoride rods.
Vestad TA; Malinen E; Olsen DR; Hole EO; Sagstuen E
Phys Med Biol; 2004 Oct; 49(20):4701-15. PubMed ID: 15566169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Neutron dosimetry with 6LiF-rich TL sheet.
Konnai A; Odano N; Nariyama N; Ohnishi S; Nakajima N; Yamamoto K; Kishi T; Ozasa N; Ishikawa Y
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 120(1-4):133-5. PubMed ID: 16709707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Performance of Harshaw TLD-100H two-element Dosemeter.
Luo LZ; Rotunda JE
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 120(1-4):324-30. PubMed ID: 16644944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of the energy-response factor of LiF and Al2O3 in radiotherapy beams.
Mobit P; Agyingi E; Sandison G
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 119(1-4):497-9. PubMed ID: 16735558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative study of LiF:Mg,Cu,Na,Si and Li2B4O7:Cu,Ag,P TL detectors.
Miljanić S; Ranogajec-Komor M; Knezević Z; Stuhec M; Prokić M
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 119(1-4):191-6. PubMed ID: 16709712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Angular and radial dependence of the energy response factor for LIF-TLD micro-rods in 125L permanent implant source.
Mobit P; Badragan I
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 120(1-4):70-3. PubMed ID: 16782977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
