469 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24974382)
21. Capturing multidimensionality in stroke aphasia: mapping principal behavioural components to neural structures.
Butler RA; Lambon Ralph MA; Woollams AM
Brain; 2014 Dec; 137(Pt 12):3248-66. PubMed ID: 25348632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The neural and neurocomputational bases of recovery from post-stroke aphasia.
Stefaniak JD; Halai AD; Lambon Ralph MA
Nat Rev Neurol; 2020 Jan; 16(1):43-55. PubMed ID: 31772339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Right hemisphere structural adaptation and changing language skills years after left hemisphere stroke.
Hope TMH; Leff AP; Prejawa S; Bruce R; Haigh Z; Lim L; Ramsden S; Oberhuber M; Ludersdorfer P; Crinion J; Seghier ML; Price CJ
Brain; 2017 Jun; 140(6):1718-1728. PubMed ID: 28444235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Right hemisphere grey matter structure and language outcomes in chronic left hemisphere stroke.
Xing S; Lacey EH; Skipper-Kallal LM; Jiang X; Harris-Love ML; Zeng J; Turkeltaub PE
Brain; 2016 Jan; 139(Pt 1):227-41. PubMed ID: 26521078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Early aphasia rehabilitation is associated with functional reactivation of the left inferior frontal gyrus: a pilot study.
Mattioli F; Ambrosi C; Mascaro L; Scarpazza C; Pasquali P; Frugoni M; Magoni M; Biagi L; Gasparotti R
Stroke; 2014 Feb; 45(2):545-52. PubMed ID: 24309584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. No effects of anodal transcranial direct stimulation on language abilities in early rehabilitation of post-stroke aphasic patients.
Polanowska KE; Leśniak M; Seniów JB; Członkowska A
Neurol Neurochir Pol; 2013; 47(5):414-22. PubMed ID: 24166562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The use of non-invasive brain stimulation techniques to facilitate recovery from post-stroke aphasia.
Schlaug G; Marchina S; Wan CY
Neuropsychol Rev; 2011 Sep; 21(3):288-301. PubMed ID: 21842404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Re-emergence of modular brain networks in stroke recovery.
Siegel JS; Seitzman BA; Ramsey LE; Ortega M; Gordon EM; Dosenbach NUF; Petersen SE; Shulman GL; Corbetta M
Cortex; 2018 Apr; 101():44-59. PubMed ID: 29414460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Domain-general subregions of the medial prefrontal cortex contribute to recovery of language after stroke.
Geranmayeh F; Chau TW; Wise RJS; Leech R; Hampshire A
Brain; 2017 Jul; 140(7):1947-1958. PubMed ID: 29177494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A functional MRI study of the relationship between naming treatment outcomes and resting state functional connectivity in post-stroke aphasia.
van Hees S; McMahon K; Angwin A; de Zubicaray G; Read S; Copland DA
Hum Brain Mapp; 2014 Aug; 35(8):3919-31. PubMed ID: 24453137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Changes in Functional Connectivity of Default Mode Network with Auditory and Right Frontoparietal Networks in Poststroke Aphasia.
Balaev V; Petrushevsky A; Martynova O
Brain Connect; 2016 Nov; 6(9):714-723. PubMed ID: 27506234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Beta EEG band: a measure of functional brain damage and language reorganization in aphasic patients after recovery.
Spironelli C; Manfredi M; Angrilli A
Cortex; 2013; 49(10):2650-60. PubMed ID: 23810123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Noninvasive brain stimulation in the treatment of aphasia: exploring interhemispheric relationships and their implications for neurorehabilitation.
Chrysikou EG; Hamilton RH
Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2011; 29(6):375-94. PubMed ID: 22124035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Changes in dynamic resting state network connectivity following aphasia therapy.
Duncan ES; Small SL
Brain Imaging Behav; 2018 Aug; 12(4):1141-1149. PubMed ID: 29064020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Recovery of offline and online sentence processing in aphasia: Language and domain-general network neuroplasticity.
Barbieri E; Mack J; Chiappetta B; Europa E; Thompson CK
Cortex; 2019 Nov; 120():394-418. PubMed ID: 31419597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Treatment-related changes in neural activation vary according to treatment response and extent of spared tissue in patients with chronic aphasia.
Johnson JP; Meier EL; Pan Y; Kiran S
Cortex; 2019 Dec; 121():147-168. PubMed ID: 31627014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Using functional imaging to understand therapeutic effects in poststroke aphasia.
Crinion JT; Leff AP
Curr Opin Neurol; 2015 Aug; 28(4):330-7. PubMed ID: 26110806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Looking at ancillary systems for verb recovery: Evidence from non-invasive brain stimulation.
Pisano F; Marangolo P
Brain Cogn; 2020 Mar; 139():105515. PubMed ID: 31902738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Recovery from post-stroke aphasia: lessons from brain imaging and implications for rehabilitation and biological treatments.
Berthier ML; García-Casares N; Walsh SF; Nabrozidis A; Ruíz de Mier RJ; Green C; Dávila G; Gutiérrez A; Pulvermüller F
Discov Med; 2011 Oct; 12(65):275-89. PubMed ID: 22031666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Neuroplasticity and aphasia treatments: new approaches for an old problem.
Crosson B; Rodriguez AD; Copland D; Fridriksson J; Krishnamurthy LC; Meinzer M; Raymer AM; Krishnamurthy V; Leff AP
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry; 2019 Oct; 90(10):1147-1155. PubMed ID: 31055282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
