374 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24974481)
1. Osseointegration: biological events in relation to characteristics of the implant surface.
Feller L; Chandran R; Khammissa RA; Meyerov R; Jadwat Y; Bouckaert M; Schechter I; Lemmer J
SADJ; 2014 Apr; 69(3):112, 114-7. PubMed ID: 24974481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In vivo monitoring of the bone healing process around different titanium alloy implant surfaces placed into fresh extraction sockets.
Colombo JS; Satoshi S; Okazaki J; Crean SJ; Sloan AJ; Waddington RJ
J Dent; 2012 Apr; 40(4):338-46. PubMed ID: 22307025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of a cell adhesion molecule coating on the blasted surface of titanium implants on bone healing in the rabbit femur.
Park JW; Lee SG; Choi BJ; Suh JY
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(4):533-41. PubMed ID: 17929513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mechanical anchorage and peri-implant bone formation of surface-modified zirconia in minipigs.
Schliephake H; Hefti T; Schlottig F; Gédet P; Staedt H
J Clin Periodontol; 2010 Sep; 37(9):818-28. PubMed ID: 20573183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Peri-implant osteogenesis in health and osteoporosis.
Marco F; Milena F; Gianluca G; Vittoria O
Micron; 2005; 36(7-8):630-44. PubMed ID: 16182543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Osseointegration of titanium, titanium alloy and zirconia dental implants: current knowledge and open questions.
Bosshardt DD; Chappuis V; Buser D
Periodontol 2000; 2017 Feb; 73(1):22-40. PubMed ID: 28000277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. What physical and/or biochemical characteristics of roughened endosseous implant surfaces particularly enhance their bone-implant contact capability?
Cooper LF; Deporter D; Wennerberg A; Hämmerle C
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(2):307-12. PubMed ID: 15839126
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanical and histomorphometric comparison between zirconia implants with varying surface textures and a titanium implant in the maxilla of miniature pigs.
Gahlert M; Gudehus T; Eichhorn S; Steinhauser E; Kniha H; Erhardt W
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):662-8. PubMed ID: 17608736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of a machined collar on crestal bone changes around titanium implants: a histometric study in the canine mandible.
Hermann JS; Jones AA; Bakaeen LG; Buser D; Schoolfield JD; Cochran DL
J Periodontol; 2011 Sep; 82(9):1329-38. PubMed ID: 21486176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of dehiscences to the bone response of implants with an Acid-etched surface: an experimental study in miniature pigs.
Ruehe B; Heberer S; Bayreuther K; Nelson K
J Oral Implantol; 2011; 37(1):3-17. PubMed ID: 20557147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Implant surface material, design, and osseointegration.
Ogle OE
Dent Clin North Am; 2015 Apr; 59(2):505-20. PubMed ID: 25835806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cellular responses evoked by different surface characteristics of intraosseous titanium implants.
Feller L; Jadwat Y; Khammissa RA; Meyerov R; Schechter I; Lemmer J
Biomed Res Int; 2015; 2015():171945. PubMed ID: 25767803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Early bone healing around 2 different experimental, HA grit-blasted, and dual acid-etched titanium implant surfaces. A pilot study in rabbits.
Gobbato L; Arguello E; Martin IS; Hawley CE; Griffin TJ
Implant Dent; 2012 Dec; 21(6):454-60. PubMed ID: 23149502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dental implant thread pitch and its influence on the osseointegration process: an in vivo comparison study.
Orsini E; Giavaresi G; Trirè A; Ottani V; Salgarello S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(2):383-92. PubMed ID: 22442779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Osseointegration and stability of a modified sand-blasted acid-etched implant: an experimental pilot study in sheep.
Abdel-Haq J; Karabuda CZ; Arısan V; Mutlu Z; Kürkçü M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Mar; 22(3):265-74. PubMed ID: 20946211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The role of titanium implant surface modification with hydroxyapatite nanoparticles in progressive early bone-implant fixation in vivo.
Lin A; Wang CJ; Kelly J; Gubbi P; Nishimura I
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):808-16. PubMed ID: 19865620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bone healing at implants with a fluoride-modified surface: an experimental study in dogs.
Berglundh T; Abrahamsson I; Albouy JP; Lindhe J
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Apr; 18(2):147-52. PubMed ID: 17269959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biological performance of chemical hydroxyapatite coating associated with implant surface modification by laser beam: biomechanical study in rabbit tibias.
Faeda RS; Tavares HS; Sartori R; Guastaldi AC; Marcantonio E
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 67(8):1706-15. PubMed ID: 19615586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Crestal remodelling and osseointegration at surface-modified commercially pure titanium and titanium alloy implants in a canine model.
Lee J; Hurson S; Tadros H; Schüpbach P; Susin C; Wikesjö UM
J Clin Periodontol; 2012 Aug; 39(8):781-8. PubMed ID: 22671935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical comparison of different surface modifications for dental implants.
Ferguson SJ; Langhoff JD; Voelter K; von Rechenberg B; Scharnweber D; Bierbaum S; Schnabelrauch M; Kautz AR; Frauchiger VM; Mueller TL; van Lenthe GH; Schlottig F
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(6):1037-46. PubMed ID: 19216272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
