These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
8. Remote ischemic preconditioning in elective percutaneous coronary intervention does not protect myocardium nor mobilize endothelial progenitor cells. Abdel-Latif A; Moliterno DJ Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 May; 81(6):937-8. PubMed ID: 23606488 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Prevention of Periprocedural Myocardial Injury During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease. Ito S; Kitakaze M Circ J; 2018 Jun; 82(7):1746-1748. PubMed ID: 29769462 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Remote ischemic preconditioning stimulus does not reduce microvascular resistance or improve myocardial blood flow in patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention. Hoole SP; Heck PM; White PA; Khan SN; O'Sullivan M; Clarke SC; Dutka DP Angiology; 2009; 60(4):403-11. PubMed ID: 19106155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Remote ischemic preconditioning reduces contrast-induced acute kidney injury in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a randomized controlled trial. Yamanaka T; Kawai Y; Miyoshi T; Mima T; Takagaki K; Tsukuda S; Kazatani Y; Nakamura K; Ito H Int J Cardiol; 2015 Jan; 178():136-41. PubMed ID: 25464237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Remote ischemic preconditioning immediately before percutaneous coronary intervention does not impact myocardial necrosis, inflammatory response, and circulating endothelial progenitor cell counts: a single center randomized sham controlled trial. Prasad A; Gössl M; Hoyt J; Lennon RJ; Polk L; Simari R; Holmes DR; Rihal CS; Lerman A Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 May; 81(6):930-6. PubMed ID: 22517646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Remote ischemic preconditioning and endothelial function in patients with acute myocardial infarction and primary PCI. Manchurov V; Ryazankina N; Khmara T; Skrypnik D; Reztsov R; Vasilieva E; Shpektor A Am J Med; 2014 Jul; 127(7):670-3. PubMed ID: 24565591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of remote ischemic preconditioning on serum troponin T level following elective percutaneous coronary intervention. Ahmed RM; Mohamed el-HA; Ashraf M; Maithili S; Nabil F; Rami R; Mohamed TI Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Nov; 82(5):E647-53. PubMed ID: 23404916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of remote ischemic preconditioning on myocardial injury and endothelial function and prognosis after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Zhou FZ; Song W; Yin LH; Song ZF; Yang S; Yang FB; Liu JF; Song YG; Zhang HY; Zhang ZM Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2017 Oct; 21(20):4642-4648. PubMed ID: 29131250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Remote Ischemic Perconditioning to Reduce Reperfusion Injury During Acute ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. McLeod SL; Iansavichene A; Cheskes S J Am Heart Assoc; 2017 May; 6(5):. PubMed ID: 28515120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Periprocedural use of tirofiban in elective percutaneous coronary intervention for long coronary lesions in stable patients with overlapping drug-eluting stents--the PETITION study: a prospective, randomized, multicenter study. Zhang Q; Wang XL; Liao ML; Hu J; Yang ZK; Ding FH; Zhang JS; Du R; Zhu TQ; Shen WF; Zhang RY Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Mar; 85 Suppl 1():762-9. PubMed ID: 25630513 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Remote ischemic preconditioning for reduction of peri-procedural myocardial injury during percutaneous coronary intervention. Katritsis GD; Zografos TA; Katsivas AG Hellenic J Cardiol; 2014; 55(3):245-55. PubMed ID: 24862617 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of long-term statin therapy on postprocedural myocardial infarction in patients undergoing nonemergency percutaneous coronary intervention. Gordin J; Haider A; Swaminathan RV; Kim LK; Minutello RM; Bergman G; Wong SC; Feldman DN Am J Cardiol; 2012 Nov; 110(10):1397-404. PubMed ID: 22858186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Why did remote ischaemic conditioning not improve clinical outcomes in acute myocardial infarction in the CONDI-2/ERIC-PPCI trial? Hausenloy DJ; Bøtker HE Cardiovasc Res; 2019 Dec; 115(14):e161-e163. PubMed ID: 31621833 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]