These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24974812)

  • 21. Comparison of visual recovery and refractive stability between femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery and standard phacoemulsification: six-month follow-up.
    Conrad-Hengerer I; Al Sheikh M; Hengerer FH; Schultz T; Dick HB
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Jul; 41(7):1356-64. PubMed ID: 26287876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Cost of teaching cataract surgery in a public hospital].
    Benzekri R; Marie-Louise J; Chahed S
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2017 Dec; 40(10):860-864. PubMed ID: 29129336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of 2 techniques for managing posterior polar cataracts: Traditional phacoemulsification versus femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery.
    Alder BD; Donaldson KE
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 Dec; 40(12):2148-51. PubMed ID: 25450246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comment on: Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery versus 2.2-mm clear corneal phacoemulsification.
    Sen S; Khokhar S; Aron N; Saini P
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2018 Feb; 66(2):344. PubMed ID: 29380805
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Re: Brown et al.: Cataract surgery cost utility revisited in 2012: a new economic paradigm. (Ophthalmology 2013;120:2367-76).
    Lee BS; Kymes SM
    Ophthalmology; 2015 Nov; 122(11):e69-70. PubMed ID: 26798856
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Reply to comment on: Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery versus 2.2 mm clear corneal phacoemulsification.
    Ranjini H; Murthy PR; Murthy GJ; Murthy VR
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2018 Feb; 66(2):344-345. PubMed ID: 29380806
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Two techniques for managing posterior polar cataracts: traditional phacoemulsification versus femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery.
    Gorovoy I
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Mar; 41(3):696. PubMed ID: 25804600
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Postoperative IOL Axial Movements and Refractive Changes After Femtosecond Laser-assisted Cataract Surgery Versus Conventional Phacoemulsification.
    Toto L; Mastropasqua R; Mattei PA; Agnifili L; Mastropasqua A; Falconio G; Di Nicola M; Mastropasqua L
    J Refract Surg; 2015 Aug; 31(8):524-30. PubMed ID: 26248345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Cystoid macular edema after femtosecond laser-assisted versus phacoemulsification cataract surgery: Letter 1.
    Levitz L; Reich J; Roberts TV; Lawless M
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Jun; 42(6):946-7. PubMed ID: 27373407
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Cystoid macular edema after femtosecond laser-assisted versus phacoemulsification cataract surgery: Letter 2.
    Dick HB; Schultz T
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Jun; 42(6):947-8. PubMed ID: 27373409
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of vitreous loss rates between manual phacoemulsification and femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery.
    Scott WJ; Tauber S; Gessler JA; Ohly JG; Owsiak RR; Eck CD
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Jul; 42(7):1003-8. PubMed ID: 27492098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Femtosecond laser-assisted compared with standard cataract surgery for removal of advanced cataracts.
    Hatch KM; Schultz T; Talamo JH; Dick HB
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Sep; 41(9):1833-8. PubMed ID: 26603391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Cortex removal after laser cataract surgery and standard phacoemulsification: a critical analysis of 800 consecutive cases.
    Conrad-Hengerer I; Schultz T; Jones JJ; Hengerer FH; Dick B
    J Refract Surg; 2014 Aug; 30(8):516-20. PubMed ID: 24972411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Why do phacoemulsification? Manual small-incision cataract surgery is almost as effective, but less expensive.
    Gogate P; Deshpande M; Nirmalan PK
    Ophthalmology; 2007 May; 114(5):965-8. PubMed ID: 17296230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Cost-effectiveness.
    Radhakrishnan M; Venkatesh R; Ravindran RD
    Ophthalmology; 2008 Jan; 115(1):211-2; author reply 212. PubMed ID: 18166413
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Rehabilitation of patients with posttraumatic cataracts using a YAG laser].
    Stepanov AV; Ivanov AN; Kiseleva OA
    Oftalmol Zh; 1987; (7):415-8. PubMed ID: 3441339
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Objective evaluation the application of femtosecond laser in cataract surgery].
    Liu YZ
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Feb; 52(2):81-4. PubMed ID: 26906700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Phacoemulsification versus extracapsular extraction: governmental costs.
    Kara N; Sirtoli MG; Santhiago MR; Parede TR; Espíndola RF; Carvalho Rde S
    Clinics (Sao Paulo); 2010 Apr; 65(4):357-61. PubMed ID: 20454491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery in a public teaching hospital setting.
    Vasquez-Perez A; Simpson A; Nanavaty MA
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2018 Feb; 18(1):26. PubMed ID: 29394929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Potential confounding factors in a comparison of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery versus standard phacoemulsification.
    Talamo JH; Dick HB; Schultz T; Scott WJ
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Aug; 41(8):1792. PubMed ID: 26432150
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.