These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
48. AMMOS2: a web server for protein-ligand-water complexes refinement via molecular mechanics. Labbé CM; Pencheva T; Jereva D; Desvillechabrol D; Becot J; Villoutreix BO; Pajeva I; Miteva MA Nucleic Acids Res; 2017 Jul; 45(W1):W350-W355. PubMed ID: 28486703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Characterization of endostatin binding to heparin and heparan sulfate by surface plasmon resonance and molecular modeling: role of divalent cations. Ricard-Blum S; Féraud O; Lortat-Jacob H; Rencurosi A; Fukai N; Dkhissi F; Vittet D; Imberty A; Olsen BR; van der Rest M J Biol Chem; 2004 Jan; 279(4):2927-36. PubMed ID: 14585835 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. GalaxySite: ligand-binding-site prediction by using molecular docking. Heo L; Shin WH; Lee MS; Seok C Nucleic Acids Res; 2014 Jul; 42(Web Server issue):W210-4. PubMed ID: 24753427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Exploring protein-protein interactions using the site-identification by ligand competitive saturation methodology. Yu W; Jo S; Lakkaraju SK; Weber DJ; MacKerell AD Proteins; 2019 Apr; 87(4):289-301. PubMed ID: 30582220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Flexible ligand docking: a multistep strategy approach. Wang J; Kollman PA; Kuntz ID Proteins; 1999 Jul; 36(1):1-19. PubMed ID: 10373002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Is It Reliable to Take the Molecular Docking Top Scoring Position as the Best Solution without Considering Available Structural Data? Ramírez D; Caballero J Molecules; 2018 Apr; 23(5):. PubMed ID: 29710787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. PLHINT: A knowledge-driven computational approach based on the intermolecular H bond interactions at the protein-ligand interface from docking solutions. Kumar SP J Mol Graph Model; 2018 Jan; 79():194-212. PubMed ID: 29241118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Computational drill down on FGF1-heparin interactions through methodological evaluation. Babik S; Samsonov SA; Pisabarro MT Glycoconj J; 2017 Jun; 34(3):427-440. PubMed ID: 27858202 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. ProBiS-ligands: a web server for prediction of ligands by examination of protein binding sites. Konc J; Janežič D Nucleic Acids Res; 2014 Jul; 42(Web Server issue):W215-20. PubMed ID: 24861616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Use of sulfated linked cyclitols as heparan sulfate mimetics to probe the heparin/heparan sulfate binding specificity of proteins. Freeman C; Liu L; Banwell MG; Brown KJ; Bezos A; Ferro V; Parish CR J Biol Chem; 2005 Mar; 280(10):8842-9. PubMed ID: 15632177 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Monte Carlo refinement of rigid-body protein docking structures with backbone displacement and side-chain optimization. Lorenzen S; Zhang Y Protein Sci; 2007 Dec; 16(12):2716-25. PubMed ID: 17965193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Modeling of protein-peptide interactions using the CABS-dock web server for binding site search and flexible docking. Blaszczyk M; Kurcinski M; Kouza M; Wieteska L; Debinski A; Kolinski A; Kmiecik S Methods; 2016 Jan; 93():72-83. PubMed ID: 26165956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Protein docking by Rotation-Based Uniform Sampling (RotBUS) with fast computing of intermolecular contact distance and residue desolvation. Solernou A; Fernandez-Recio J BMC Bioinformatics; 2010 Jun; 11():352. PubMed ID: 20584304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]