255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24976231)
1. Accuracy of transrectal ultrasonography to evaluate pathologic prostate weight: correlation with various prostate size groups.
Bienz M; Hueber PA; Al-Hathal N; McCormack M; Bhojani N; Trinh QD; Zorn KC
Urology; 2014 Jul; 84(1):169-74. PubMed ID: 24976231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy of ultrasound in estimation of prostate weight: comparison of urologists and radiologists.
Nunez-Nateras R; Andrews JR; Martin GL; Andrews PE; Humphreys MR; Ferrigni RG; Eversman WG; Castle EP
Can J Urol; 2010 Feb; 17(1):4985-8. PubMed ID: 20156377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of Clarius, Handheld Wireless Point-of-Care Ultrasound, in Evaluating Prostate Morphology and Volume Compared to Radical Prostatectomy Specimen Weight: Is There a Difference between Transabdominal
Moussaoui G; Zakaria AS; Negrean C; Nguyen DD; Couture F; Tholomier C; Sadri I; Arezki A; Schwartz RN; Elterman DS; Misrai V; Bhojani N; Herrmann TRW; Zorn KC
J Endourol; 2021 Sep; 35(9):1300-1306. PubMed ID: 33677990
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Prostate weight is the preferred measure of prostate size in radical prostatectomy cohorts.
Hong MK; Yao HH; Rzetelski-West K; Namdarian B; Pedersen J; Peters JS; Hovens CM; Corcoran NM
BJU Int; 2012 Apr; 109 Suppl 3():57-63. PubMed ID: 22458496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Transrectal ultrasound versus magnetic resonance imaging in the estimation of prostate volume as compared with radical prostatectomy specimens.
Lee JS; Chung BH
Urol Int; 2007; 78(4):323-7. PubMed ID: 17495490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The accuracy of transrectal ultrasound prostate volume estimation: clinical correlations.
Matthews GJ; Motta J; Fracehia JA
J Clin Ultrasound; 1996; 24(9):501-5. PubMed ID: 8906481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of prostate volume measured by transrectal ultrasonography and MRI with the actual prostate volume measured after radical prostatectomy.
Jeong CW; Park HK; Hong SK; Byun SS; Lee HJ; Lee SE
Urol Int; 2008; 81(2):179-85. PubMed ID: 18758216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prostate volume estimation using the ellipsoid formula consistently underestimates actual gland size.
Rodriguez E; Skarecky D; Narula N; Ahlering TE
J Urol; 2008 Feb; 179(2):501-3. PubMed ID: 18076916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Modified prostate volume algorithm improves transrectal US volume estimation in men presenting for prostate brachytherapy.
MacMahon PJ; Kennedy AM; Murphy DT; Maher M; McNicholas MM
Radiology; 2009 Jan; 250(1):273-80. PubMed ID: 19092098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Localising prostate cancer: comparison of endorectal magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and 3D-MR spectroscopic imaging with transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy.
Goris Gbenou MC; Peltier A; Addla SK; Lemort M; Bollens R; Larsimont D; Roumeguère T; Schulman CC; van Velthoven R
Urol Int; 2012; 88(1):12-7. PubMed ID: 22004874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Body mass index, prostate weight and transrectal ultrasound prostate volume accuracy.
Sajadi KP; Terris MK; Hamilton RJ; Cullen J; Amling CL; Kane CJ; Presti JC; Aronson WJ; Freedland SJ
J Urol; 2007 Sep; 178(3 Pt 1):990-5. PubMed ID: 17632170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of prostate volume measured by transrectal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging: is transrectal ultrasound suitable to determine which patients should undergo active surveillance?
Weiss BE; Wein AJ; Malkowicz SB; Guzzo TJ
Urol Oncol; 2013 Nov; 31(8):1436-40. PubMed ID: 22503576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improving ultrasound-based prostate volume estimation.
Aprikian S; Luz M; Brimo F; Scarlata E; Hamel L; Cury FL; Tanguay S; Aprikian AG; Kassouf W; Chevalier S
BMC Urol; 2019 Jul; 19(1):68. PubMed ID: 31340802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of prostate weight estimation by digital rectal examination versus transrectal ultrasonography.
Loeb S; Han M; Roehl KA; Antenor JA; Catalona WJ
J Urol; 2005 Jan; 173(1):63-5. PubMed ID: 15592029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Transrectal ultrasonography: why are estimates of prostate volume and dimension so inaccurate?
Nathan MS; Seenivasagam K; Mei Q; Wickham JE; Miller RA
Br J Urol; 1996 Mar; 77(3):401-7. PubMed ID: 8814846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of in-vivo assessment of prostatic volume by MRI and transrectal ultrasonography.
Rahmouni A; Yang A; Tempany CM; Frenkel T; Epstein J; Walsh P; Leichner PK; Ricci C; Zerhouni E
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1992; 16(6):935-40. PubMed ID: 1385499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Analysis of suprapubic and transrectal measurements in assessment of prostate dimensions and volume: is transrectal ultrasonography really necessary for prostate measurements?
Ozden E; Göğüş C; Kiliç O; Yaman O; Ozdiler E
Urol J; 2009; 6(3):208-13. PubMed ID: 19711277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Determination of prostate gland volume by transrectal ultrasound: correlation with radical prostatectomy specimens.
Myschetzky PS; Suburu RE; Kelly BS; Wilson ML; Chen SC; Lee F
Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl; 1991; 137():107-11. PubMed ID: 1947827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Transrectal ultrasonic volumetry of the prostate: in vivo comparison of different methods.
Bangma CH; Niemer AQ; Grobbee DE; Schröder FH
Prostate; 1996 Feb; 28(2):107-10. PubMed ID: 8604390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Determination of prostate volume by transrectal ultrasound.
Terris MK; Stamey TA
J Urol; 1991 May; 145(5):984-7. PubMed ID: 2016815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
