These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24976355)

  • 41. Neural correlates of spatial and non-spatial inhibition of return (IOR) in attentional orienting.
    Zhou X; Chen Q
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Sep; 46(11):2766-75. PubMed ID: 18597795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The effect of age on inhibition of return is independent of non-ocular response inhibition.
    Poliakoff E; Coward RS; Lowe C; O'Boyle DJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Jan; 45(2):387-96. PubMed ID: 16884743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Does cue processing modulate inhibition of return in a detection task?
    Zhou B; Yang T; Bao Y
    Psych J; 2019 Mar; 8(1):158-164. PubMed ID: 30375191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Inhibition of return and response repetition within and between modalities.
    Roggeveen AB; Prime DJ; Ward LM
    Exp Brain Res; 2005 Nov; 167(1):86-94. PubMed ID: 16049684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Attentional orienting induced by arrows and eye-gaze compared with an endogenous cue.
    Brignani D; Guzzon D; Marzi CA; Miniussi C
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Jan; 47(2):370-81. PubMed ID: 18926835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. On the nature of the delayed "inhibitory" cueing effects generated by uninformative arrows at fixation.
    Hilchey MD; Satel J; Ivanoff J; Klein RM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2013 Jun; 20(3):593-600. PubMed ID: 23361390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. On the relationship between occipital cortex activity and inhibition of return.
    Prime DJ; Jolicoeur P
    Psychophysiology; 2009 Nov; 46(6):1278-87. PubMed ID: 19572908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Inhibitory cueing effects following manual and saccadic responses to arrow cues.
    Ding Y; He T; Satel J; Wang Z
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 May; 78(4):1020-9. PubMed ID: 26956560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. An intact eye-movement system is not required to generate inhibition of return.
    Smith DT; Jackson SR; Rorden C
    J Neuropsychol; 2009 Sep; 3(Pt 2):267-71. PubMed ID: 19338722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Lost in vision: ERP correlates of exogenous tactile attention when engaging in a visual task.
    Jones A; Forster B
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Mar; 51(4):675-85. PubMed ID: 23340481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Dissociable spatial and temporal effects of inhibition of return.
    Wang Z; Theeuwes J
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(8):e44290. PubMed ID: 22952949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Examining the dissociation of retinotopic and spatiotopic inhibition of return with event-related potentials.
    Satel J; Wang Z; Hilchey MD; Klein RM
    Neurosci Lett; 2012 Aug; 524(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 22801253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. When do fearful faces override inhibition of return?
    Silvert L; Funes MJ
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 Jan; 163():124-34. PubMed ID: 26642227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Involuntary cueing effects during smooth pursuit: facilitation and inhibition of return in oculocentric coordinates.
    Souto D; Kerzel D
    Exp Brain Res; 2009 Jan; 192(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 18777172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Differentiating spatial and object-based effects on attention: an event-related brain potential study with peripheral cueing.
    He X; Humphreys G; Fan S; Chen L; Han S
    Brain Res; 2008 Dec; 1245():116-25. PubMed ID: 18955038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Error-processing of oculomotor capture.
    Belopolsky AV; Kramer AF
    Brain Res; 2006 Apr; 1081(1):171-8. PubMed ID: 16499886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The time course of the effects of central and peripheral cues on visual processing: an event-related potentials study.
    Doallo S; Lorenzo-López L; Vizoso C; Rodríguez Holguín S; Amenedo E; Bará S; Cadaveira F
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Jan; 115(1):199-210. PubMed ID: 14706489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The effect of scene removal on inhibition of return in a cue-target task.
    Redden RS; Klages J; Klein RM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Jan; 79(1):78-84. PubMed ID: 27804031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Changes in predictive cuing modulate the hemispheric distribution of the P1 inhibitory response to attentional targets.
    Lasaponara S; D' Onofrio M; Dragone A; Pinto M; Caratelli L; Doricchi F
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 May; 99():156-164. PubMed ID: 28283318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Neural processes of attentional inhibition of return traced with magnetoencephalography.
    Ayabe T; Ishizu T; Kojima S; Urakawa T; Nishitani N; Kaneoke Y; Kakigi R
    Neuroscience; 2008 Oct; 156(3):769-80. PubMed ID: 18762232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.