132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24976519)
1. Identification of abnormal screening mammogram interpretation using Medicare claims data.
Hubbard RA; Zhu W; Balch S; Onega T; Fenton JJ
Health Serv Res; 2015 Feb; 50(1):290-304. PubMed ID: 24976519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validation of a Medicare Claims-based Algorithm for Identifying Breast Cancers Detected at Screening Mammography.
Fenton JJ; Onega T; Zhu W; Balch S; Smith-Bindman R; Henderson L; Sprague BL; Kerlikowske K; Hubbard RA
Med Care; 2016 Mar; 54(3):e15-22. PubMed ID: 23929404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Distinguishing screening from diagnostic mammograms using Medicare claims data.
Fenton JJ; Zhu W; Balch S; Smith-Bindman R; Fishman P; Hubbard RA
Med Care; 2014 Jul; 52(7):e44-51. PubMed ID: 22922433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Using Medicare data to estimate the prevalence of breast cancer screening in older women: comparison of different methods to identify screening mammograms.
Randolph WM; Mahnken JD; Goodwin JS; Freeman JL
Health Serv Res; 2002 Dec; 37(6):1643-57. PubMed ID: 12546290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Can Medicare billing claims data be used to assess mammography utilization among women ages 65 and older?
Smith-Bindman R; Quale C; Chu PW; Rosenberg R; Kerlikowske K
Med Care; 2006 May; 44(5):463-70. PubMed ID: 16641665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. External validation of Medicare claims codes for digital mammography and computer-aided detection.
Fenton JJ; Zhu W; Balch S; Smith-Bindman R; Lindfors KK; Hubbard RA
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2012 Aug; 21(8):1344-7. PubMed ID: 22695737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An algorithm for the use of Medicare claims data to identify women with incident breast cancer.
Nattinger AB; Laud PW; Bajorunaite R; Sparapani RA; Freeman JL
Health Serv Res; 2004 Dec; 39(6 Pt 1):1733-49. PubMed ID: 15533184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Measuring the performance of screening mammography in community practice with Medicare claims data.
Freeman JL; Goodwin JS; Zhang D; Nattinger AB; Freeman DH
Women Health; 2003; 37(2):1-15. PubMed ID: 12733550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The sensitivity of Medicare billing claims data for monitoring mammography use by elderly women.
Mouchawar J; Byers T; Warren M; Schluter WW
Med Care Res Rev; 2004 Mar; 61(1):116-27. PubMed ID: 15035859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of digital mammography uptake on downstream breast-related care among older women.
Hubbard RA; Zhu W; Onega TL; Fishman P; Henderson LM; Tosteson AN; Buist DS
Med Care; 2012 Dec; 50(12):1053-9. PubMed ID: 23132199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Classification accuracy of claims-based methods for identifying providers failing to meet performance targets.
Hubbard RA; Benjamin-Johnson R; Onega T; Smith-Bindman R; Zhu W; Fenton JJ
Stat Med; 2015 Jan; 34(1):93-105. PubMed ID: 25302935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of three algorithms to identify incident breast cancer in Medicare claims data.
Gold HT; Do HT
Health Serv Res; 2007 Oct; 42(5):2056-69. PubMed ID: 17850533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnostic testing following screening mammography in the elderly.
Welch HG; Fisher ES
J Natl Cancer Inst; 1998 Sep; 90(18):1389-92. PubMed ID: 9747869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. National Performance Benchmarks for Modern Diagnostic Digital Mammography: Update from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium.
Sprague BL; Arao RF; Miglioretti DL; Henderson LM; Buist DS; Onega T; Rauscher GH; Lee JM; Tosteson AN; Kerlikowske K; Lehman CD;
Radiology; 2017 Apr; 283(1):59-69. PubMed ID: 28244803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Short-term outcomes of screening mammography using computer-aided detection: a population-based study of medicare enrollees.
Fenton JJ; Xing G; Elmore JG; Bang H; Chen SL; Lindfors KK; Baldwin LM
Ann Intern Med; 2013 Apr; 158(8):580-7. PubMed ID: 23588746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Performance of first mammography examination in women younger than 40 years.
Yankaskas BC; Haneuse S; Kapp JM; Kerlikowske K; Geller B; Buist DS;
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2010 May; 102(10):692-701. PubMed ID: 20439838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Breast Biopsy Intensity and Findings Following Breast Cancer Screening in Women With and Without a Personal History of Breast Cancer.
Buist DSM; Abraham L; Lee CI; Lee JM; Lehman C; O'Meara ES; Stout NK; Henderson LM; Hill D; Wernli KJ; Haas JS; Tosteson ANA; Kerlikowske K; Onega T;
JAMA Intern Med; 2018 Apr; 178(4):458-468. PubMed ID: 29435556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Linked claims and medical records for cancer case management : evaluation of mammography abnormalities.
Eberl MM; Watroba N; Reinhardt M; Pomerantz J; Serghany J; Broffman G; Fox CH; Mahoney MC; Edge SB
Cancer; 2007 Aug; 110(3):518-24. PubMed ID: 17577210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Patient Cost-Sharing and Utilization of Breast Cancer Diagnostic Imaging by Patients Undergoing Subsequent Testing After a Screening Mammogram.
Hughes DR; Espinoza W; Fein S; Rula EY; McGinty G
JAMA Netw Open; 2023 Mar; 6(3):e234893. PubMed ID: 36972047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Personalized targeted mailing increases mammography among long-term noncompliant medicare beneficiaries: a randomized trial.
Harrison RV; Janz NK; Wolfe RA; Tedeschi PJ; Chernew M; Stross JK; Huang X; McMahon LF
Med Care; 2003 Mar; 41(3):375-85. PubMed ID: 12618641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
