These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24976660)

  • 1. Comment on "Estimating False Discovery Proportion Under Arbitrary Covariance Dependence" by Fan et al.
    Schwartzman A
    J Am Stat Assoc; 2012; 107(499):1039-1041. PubMed ID: 24976660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimation of the false discovery proportion with unknown dependence.
    Fan J; Han X
    J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol; 2017 Sep; 79(4):1143-1164. PubMed ID: 29056863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimating False Discovery Proportion Under Arbitrary Covariance Dependence.
    Fan J; Han X; Gu W
    J Am Stat Assoc; 2012; 107(499):1019-1035. PubMed ID: 24729644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Estimation of false discovery proportion under general dependence.
    Pawitan Y; Calza S; Ploner A
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Dec; 22(24):3025-31. PubMed ID: 17046978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On correcting the overestimation of the permutation-based false discovery rate estimator.
    Jiao S; Zhang S
    Bioinformatics; 2008 Aug; 24(15):1655-61. PubMed ID: 18573796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Competition-based control of the false discovery proportion.
    Luo D; Ebadi A; Emery K; He Y; Noble WS; Keich U
    Biometrics; 2023 Dec; 79(4):3472-3484. PubMed ID: 36652258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Unbiased False Discovery Rate Estimation for Shotgun Proteomics Based on the Target-Decoy Approach.
    Levitsky LI; Ivanov MV; Lobas AA; Gorshkov MV
    J Proteome Res; 2017 Feb; 16(2):393-397. PubMed ID: 27959540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Multiple Testing of Submatrices of a Precision Matrix with Applications to Identification of Between Pathway Interactions.
    Xia Y; Cai T; Cai TT
    J Am Stat Assoc; 2018; 113(521):328-339. PubMed ID: 29881130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. FarmTest: Factor-adjusted robust multiple testing with approximate false discovery control.
    Fan J; Ke Y; Sun Q; Zhou WX
    J Am Stat Assoc; 2019; 114(528):1880-1893. PubMed ID: 33033420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparative review of estimates of the proportion unchanged genes and the false discovery rate.
    Broberg P
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Aug; 6():199. PubMed ID: 16086831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comprehensive Comparative Analysis of Local False Discovery Rate Control Methods.
    Kim SJ; Oh Y; Jeong J
    Metabolites; 2021 Jan; 11(1):. PubMed ID: 33466792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. False discovery rate estimation for large-scale homogeneous discrete p-values.
    Liang K
    Biometrics; 2016 Jun; 72(2):639-48. PubMed ID: 26492596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Controlling false discovery proportion in identification of drug-related adverse events from multiple system organ classes.
    Tan X; Liu GF; Zeng D; Wang W; Diao G; Heyse JF; Ibrahim JG
    Stat Med; 2019 Sep; 38(22):4378-4389. PubMed ID: 31313376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Large-Scale Simultaneous Testing of Cross-Covariance Matrices with Applications to PheWAS.
    Cai T; Cai TT; Liao K; Liu W
    Stat Sin; 2019 Apr; 29(2):983-1005. PubMed ID: 31889766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Stratified false discovery control for large-scale hypothesis testing with application to genome-wide association studies.
    Sun L; Craiu RV; Paterson AD; Bull SB
    Genet Epidemiol; 2006 Sep; 30(6):519-30. PubMed ID: 16800000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comment on "Unbiased statistical analysis for multi-stage proteomic search strategies".
    Bern M; Kil YJ
    J Proteome Res; 2011 Apr; 10(4):2123-7. PubMed ID: 21288048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Empirical Bayes estimation of posterior probabilities of enrichment: a comparative study of five estimators of the local false discovery rate.
    Yang Z; Li Z; Bickel DR
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2013 Mar; 14():87. PubMed ID: 23497228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Control procedures and estimators of the false discovery rate and their application in low-dimensional settings: an empirical investigation.
    Brinster R; Köttgen A; Tayo BO; Schumacher M; Sekula P;
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2018 Mar; 19(1):78. PubMed ID: 29499647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. False discovery rate, sensitivity and sample size for microarray studies.
    Pawitan Y; Michiels S; Koscielny S; Gusnanto A; Ploner A
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Jul; 21(13):3017-24. PubMed ID: 15840707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. SLIM: a sliding linear model for estimating the proportion of true null hypotheses in datasets with dependence structures.
    Wang HQ; Tuominen LK; Tsai CJ
    Bioinformatics; 2011 Jan; 27(2):225-31. PubMed ID: 21098430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.