These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Effects of food availability on proceptivity: a test of the reproduction at all costs and metabolic fuels hypotheses. Hobbs NJ; Finger AA; Ferkin MH Behav Processes; 2012 Oct; 91(2):192-7. PubMed ID: 22884977 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Olfactory experience affects the response of meadow voles to the opposite-sex scent donor of mixed-sex over-marks. Ferkin MH; Ferkin DA; Ferkin BD; Vlautin CT Ethology; 2010 Sep; 116(9):821-831. PubMed ID: 20694044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Age affects over-marking of opposite-sex scent marks in meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus. Ferkin MH Ethology; 2010 Jan; 116(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 20607141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Female meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus, respond differently to the scent marks of multiple male conspecifics. Ferkin MH; Hobbs NJ Anim Cogn; 2014 May; 17(3):715-22. PubMed ID: 24197276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Self discrimination in meadow voles, Ferkin MH; Pierce AA; Franklin S Ethology; 2008 Sep; 114(9):. PubMed ID: 24415819 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Gonadal hormones modulate sex differences in judgments of relative numerousness in meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus. Ferkin MH; Pierce AA; Sealand RO Horm Behav; 2009 Jan; 55(1):76-83. PubMed ID: 18809407 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sperm investment in male meadow voles is affected by the condition of the nearby male conspecifics. Vaughn AA; Delbarco-Trillo J; Ferkin MH Behav Ecol; 2008 Nov; 19(6):1159-1164. PubMed ID: 19529815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Re-feeding food-deprived male meadow voles affects the sperm allocation of their rival males. Vaughn AA; Delbarco-Trillo J; Ferkin MH Ethology; 2012 Dec; 118(12):1133-1139. PubMed ID: 23185098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Scent-marking behaviour by male prairie voles, Microtus ochrogaster, in response to the scent of opposite- and same-sex conspecifics. Thomas SA; Kaczmarek BK Behav Processes; 2002 Oct; 60(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 12429389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The role of scent-marking in patchy and highly fragmented populations of the Cabrera vole (Microtus cabrerae Thomas, 1906). Gomes LA; Mira AP; Barata EN Zoolog Sci; 2013 Apr; 30(4):248-54. PubMed ID: 23537234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The response of rodents to scent marks: four broad hypotheses. Ferkin MH Horm Behav; 2015 Feb; 68():43-52. PubMed ID: 25637402 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sexual differences in responses of meadow voles to environmental cues in the presence of mink odor. Midlick DM; Garris SS; Rohrer KN; Ferkin MH Anim Cogn; 2022 Aug; 25(4):1003-1011. PubMed ID: 35190904 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Food deprivation and restriction during late gestation affects the sexual behavior of postpartum female meadow voles, Sabau RM; Ferkin MH Ethology; 2013 Jan; 119(1):. PubMed ID: 24415820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The competing countermarks hypothesis: reliable assessment of competitive ability by potential mates. Rich TJ; Hurst JL Anim Behav; 1999 Nov; 58(5):1027-1037. PubMed ID: 10564605 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The role of prolactin and testosterone in mediating seasonal differences in the self-grooming behavior of male meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus. Leonard ST; Alizadeh-Naderi R; Stokes K; Ferkin MH Physiol Behav; 2005 Jul; 85(4):461-8. PubMed ID: 15979110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Melatonin treatment affects the attractiveness of the anogenital area scent in meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus). Ferkin MH; Kile JR Horm Behav; 1996 Sep; 30(3):227-35. PubMed ID: 8918678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]