These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24976772)

  • 1. The effect of intrauterine insemination time on semen parameters.
    Koyun E; Okyay RE; Doğan OE; Kovalı M; Doğan SS; Gülekli B
    J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc; 2014; 15(2):82-5. PubMed ID: 24976772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intrauterine insemination (IUI) pregnancy outcome is enhanced by shorter intervals from semen collection to sperm wash, from sperm wash to IUI time, and from semen collection to IUI time.
    Yavas Y; Selub MR
    Fertil Steril; 2004 Dec; 82(6):1638-47. PubMed ID: 15589871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of post-wash total progressive motile sperm count and semen volume on pregnancy outcomes in intrauterine insemination cycles: a retrospective study.
    Ok EK; Doğan OE; Okyay RE; Gülekli B
    J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc; 2013; 14(3):142-5. PubMed ID: 24592093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sperm swim-up: a simple and effective technique of semen processing for intrauterine insemination.
    Jameel T
    J Pak Med Assoc; 2008 Feb; 58(2):71-4. PubMed ID: 18333524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Semen quality and prediction of IUI success in male subfertility: a systematic review.
    Ombelet W; Dhont N; Thijssen A; Bosmans E; Kruger T
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2014 Mar; 28(3):300-9. PubMed ID: 24456701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relationship of total motile sperm count and percentage motile sperm to successful pregnancy rates following intrauterine insemination.
    Pasqualotto EB; Daitch JA; Hendin BN; Falcone T; Thomas AJ; Nelson DR; Agarwal A
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 1999 Oct; 16(9):476-82. PubMed ID: 10530401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Effects of sperm DNA fragmentation index on semen parameters and pregnancy outcomes in intrauterine insemination].
    Li ML; Zhou Q; Ge YF; Shao Y; Zeng R; Yao B
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2021 Oct; 27(10):904-908. PubMed ID: 34914269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Retrospective comparison of the semen preparation techniques for intrauterine insemination: Swim-up versus density gradient method.
    Çil N; Kabukçu C; Çabuş Ü; Turan T; Mete GA
    J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2022 Mar; 51(3):102321. PubMed ID: 35063717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How low is too low? Postwash total motile sperm count effect on pregnancy outcomes in intrauterine insemination.
    Mathes M; Kastrick E; Sayles H; Gustin S
    Hum Fertil (Camb); 2023 Dec; 26(5):1108-1113. PubMed ID: 36357350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The relationship between semen parameters in processed and unprocessed semen with intrauterine insemination success rates.
    Mollaahmadi L; Keramat A; Ghiasi A; Hashemzadeh M
    J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc; 2019 Feb; 20(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 30222125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The impact of semen processing on sperm parameters and pregnancy rates after intrauterine insemination.
    Ruiter-Ligeti J; Agbo C; Dahan M
    Minerva Ginecol; 2017 Jun; 69(3):218-224. PubMed ID: 27990794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of semen characteristics on IUI combined with mild ovarian stimulation.
    Yalti S; Gürbüz B; Sezer H; Celik S
    Arch Androl; 2004; 50(4):239-46. PubMed ID: 15277001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Semen preparation techniques for intrauterine insemination.
    Boomsma CM; Heineman MJ; Cohlen BJ; Farquhar C
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2004; (3):CD004507. PubMed ID: 15266536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of time intervals from the end of sperm collection to intrauterine insemination on the pregnancy rates in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation-intrauterine insemination cycles.
    Kuru Pekcan M; Kokanalı D; Kokanalı K; Taşçı Y
    J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2018 Dec; 47(10):561-564. PubMed ID: 30170131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of Percoll wash on sperm motion parameters and subsequent fertility in intrauterine insemination cycles.
    Swanson ML; Collins JM; Freiman SF; Dubin NH
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 1995 Jan; 12(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 7580010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison between semen parameters in specimens collected early in the morning and in the evening.
    Shimomura Y; Shin T; Osaka A; Inoue Y; Iwahata T; Kobori Y; Ide H; Soh S; Okada H
    Syst Biol Reprod Med; 2020 Apr; 66(2):147-150. PubMed ID: 32195611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Is There Any Effect of Change in Pre-Wash and Post-Wash Semen Parameters on the Success of Intrauterine Insemination?
    Yavuzcan A; Yurtçu E; Keyif B; Osmanlıoğlu Ş
    J Pers Med; 2023 Dec; 14(1):. PubMed ID: 38248745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative efficacy of density gradient and swim-up methods of semen preparation in intrauterine insemination cycles.
    Butt F; Chohan MA
    J Pak Med Assoc; 2016 Aug; 66(8):932-7. PubMed ID: 27524522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evidence for obtaining a second successive semen sample for intrauterine insemination in selected patients: results from 32 consecutive cases.
    Ortiz A; Ortiz R; Soto E; Hartmann J; Manzur A; Marconi M
    Clin Exp Reprod Med; 2016 Jun; 43(2):102-5. PubMed ID: 27358828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Preparation of oligozoospermic and/or asthenozoospermic semen for intrauterine insemination using the SpermPrep semen filtration column.
    Ohashi K; Saji F; Wakimoto A; Kato M; Tsutsui T; Tanizawa O
    Fertil Steril; 1992 Apr; 57(4):866-70. PubMed ID: 1313377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.