These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24976990)

  • 1. PET/CT evaluation of response to chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: PET response criteria in solid tumors (PERCIST) versus response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST).
    Ding Q; Cheng X; Yang L; Zhang Q; Chen J; Li T; Shi H
    J Thorac Dis; 2014 Jun; 6(6):677-83. PubMed ID: 24976990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of response to stereotactic body radiation therapy for nonsmall cell lung cancer: PET response criteria in solid tumors versus response evaluation criteria in solid tumors.
    Han J; Song Q; Guo F; Du R; Fang H; Kang J; Lu Z
    Nucl Med Commun; 2022 Jun; 43(6):717-724. PubMed ID: 35354781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The utility of
    Kitajima K; Kawanaka Y; Komoto H; Minami T; Yokoi T; Kuribayashi K; Kijima T; Nakamura A; Hashimoto M; Kondo N; Hasegawa S; Yamakado K
    Hell J Nucl Med; 2021; 24(3):186-198. PubMed ID: 34901959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for esophageal cancer: PET response criteria in solid tumors versus response evaluation criteria in solid tumors.
    Yanagawa M; Tatsumi M; Miyata H; Morii E; Tomiyama N; Watabe T; Isohashi K; Kato H; Shimosegawa E; Yamasaki M; Mori M; Doki Y; Hatazawa J
    J Nucl Med; 2012 Jun; 53(6):872-80. PubMed ID: 22582049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of RECIST, EORTC criteria and PERCIST for evaluation of early response to chemotherapy in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer.
    Shang J; Ling X; Zhang L; Tang Y; Xiao Z; Cheng Y; Guo B; Gong J; Huang L; Xu H
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2016 Oct; 43(11):1945-53. PubMed ID: 27236466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of EORTC criteria and PERCIST for PET/CT response evaluation of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with irinotecan and cetuximab.
    Skougaard K; Nielsen D; Jensen BV; Hendel HW
    J Nucl Med; 2013 Jul; 54(7):1026-31. PubMed ID: 23572497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Inter-observer agreement improves with PERCIST 1.0 as opposed to qualitative evaluation in non-small cell lung cancer patients evaluated with F-18-FDG PET/CT early in the course of chemo-radiotherapy.
    Fledelius J; Khalil A; Hjorthaug K; Frøkiær J
    EJNMMI Res; 2016 Dec; 6(1):71. PubMed ID: 27655428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer criteria, and PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors for evaluation of tumor response to chemotherapy and prognosis prediction in patients with unresectable malignant pleural mesothelioma.
    Kitajima K; Maruyama M; Minami T; Yokoi T; Kuribayashi K; Kijima T; Hashimoto M; Hasegawa S; Yamakado K
    Nucl Med Commun; 2020 Aug; 41(8):790-799. PubMed ID: 32516245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Response to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy in Patients with Unresectable Recurrent Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma Shown by FDG-PET and CT.
    Kitajima K; Maruyama M; Yokoyama H; Minami T; Yokoi T; Nakamura A; Hashimoto M; Kondo N; Kuribayashi K; Kijima T; Hasegawa S; Yamakado K
    Cancers (Basel); 2021 Mar; 13(5):. PubMed ID: 33806464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Response criteria in solid tumors (PERCIST/RECIST) and SUV
    Pierson C; Grinchak T; Sokolovic C; Holland B; Parent T; Bowling M; Arastu H; Walker P; Ju A
    Radiat Oncol; 2018 Feb; 13(1):34. PubMed ID: 29486779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Response evaluation after immunotherapy in NSCLC: Early response assessment using FDG PET/CT.
    Park S; Lee Y; Kim TS; Kim SK; Han JY
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Dec; 99(51):e23815. PubMed ID: 33371161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative analysis of different response criteria at early phase after PD-1 blockade in non-small lung cancer.
    Kaira K; Yamaguchi O; Naruse I; Umeda Y; Honda T; Watanabe S; Ichikawa K; Yanagisawa S; Kasahara N; Higuchi T; Hashimoto K; Miura Y; Shiono A; Mouri A; Imai H; Iizuka K; Ishizuka T; Minato K; Suda S; Kagamu H; Mori K; Seki N; Kuji I
    Cancer Imaging; 2023 Mar; 23(1):23. PubMed ID: 36859341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. From RECIST to PERCIST: Evolving Considerations for PET response criteria in solid tumors.
    Wahl RL; Jacene H; Kasamon Y; Lodge MA
    J Nucl Med; 2009 May; 50 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):122S-50S. PubMed ID: 19403881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using positron emission tomography (PET) response criteria in solid tumours (PERCIST) 1.0 for evaluation of 2'-deoxy-2'-[18F] fluoro-D-glucose-PET/CT scans to predict survival early during treatment of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
    Fledelius J; Khalil AA; Hjorthaug K; Frøkiaer J
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2016 Apr; 60(2):231-8. PubMed ID: 26678718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer using MRI and FDG-PET/CT-RECIST 1.1 vs. PERCIST 1.0.
    Kitajima K; Miyoshi Y; Yamano T; Odawara S; Higuchi T; Yamakado K
    Nagoya J Med Sci; 2018 May; 80(2):183-197. PubMed ID: 29915436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An evaluation of the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for osteosarcoma of extremities: PERCIST versus RECIST 1.1 criteria after long-term follow-up.
    Xu J; Li Y; Xie L; Sun X; Cai Z; Wang S; Wang Q; Sun K; Guo W
    Ann Nucl Med; 2022 Jun; 36(6):553-561. PubMed ID: 35380350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The role of early ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in prediction of progression-free survival after ⁹⁰Y radioembolization: comparison with RECIST and tumour density criteria.
    Zerizer I; Al-Nahhas A; Towey D; Tait P; Ariff B; Wasan H; Hatice G; Habib N; Barwick T
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2012 Sep; 39(9):1391-9. PubMed ID: 22644713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficacy evaluation of neoadjuvant immunotherapy plus chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer: comparison of PET/CT with postoperative pathology.
    Cheng Y; Chen ZY; Huang JJ; Shao D
    Eur Radiol; 2023 Oct; 33(10):6625-6635. PubMed ID: 37515634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The early prediction of pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and prognosis: comparison of PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer criteria in breast cancer.
    Lian W; Liu C; Gu B; Zhang J; Lu L; Pan H; Yao Z; Wang M; Song S; Zhang Y; Yang Z
    Nucl Med Commun; 2020 Mar; 41(3):280-287. PubMed ID: 32032193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with esophageal cancer assessed with CT and FDG-PET/CT - RECIST 1.1 vs. PERCIST 1.0.
    Odawara S; Kitajima K; Katsuura T; Kurahashi Y; Shinohara H; Yamakado K
    Eur J Radiol; 2018 Apr; 101():65-71. PubMed ID: 29571803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.