396 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24977457)
1. Laparoscopic versus vaginal hysterectomy for benign indications in women aged 65 years or older: propensity-matched analysis.
Bogani G; Cromi A; Uccella S; Serati M; Casarin J; Pinelli C; Lazzarini C; Ghezzi F
Menopause; 2015 Jan; 22(1):32-5. PubMed ID: 24977457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Laparoscopic and vaginal approaches to hysterectomy in the obese.
Bogani G; Cromi A; Serati M; Di Naro E; Casarin J; Pinelli C; Uccella S; Leone Roberti Maggiore U; Marconi N; Ghezzi F
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Jun; 189():85-90. PubMed ID: 25898369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Vaginal or laparoscopic hysterectomy: Do perioperative outcomes differ? A propensity score-matched analysis.
Rademaker D; Einarsson JI; Huirne JAF; Gu X; Cohen SL
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2019 Aug; 98(8):1040-1045. PubMed ID: 30793762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Hysterectomy in patients with previous cesarean section: comparison between laparoscopic and vaginal approaches.
Bogani G; Cromi A; Serati M; Di Naro E; Casarin J; Marconi N; Pinelli C; Ghezzi F
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Jan; 184():53-7. PubMed ID: 25463636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [COMPARISON OF LAPAROSCOPIC ASSISTED VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY AND VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY FOR BENIGN DISEASES AND LESIONS OF THE FEMALE GENITAL SYSTEM].
Kovachev S; Ganovska A; Stankova T
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2016; 55 Suppl 1 Pt 1():4-10. PubMed ID: 27514161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Laparoscopic vs vaginal hysterectomy for benign pathology.
Candiani M; Izzo S; Bulfoni A; Riparini J; Ronzoni S; Marconi A
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Apr; 200(4):368.e1-7. PubMed ID: 19136094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Route of hysterectomy and surgical outcomes from a statewide gynecologic oncology population: is there a role for vaginal hysterectomy?
Beck TL; Morse CB; Gray HJ; Goff BA; Urban RR; Liao JB
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Mar; 214(3):348.e1-9. PubMed ID: 26470825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of vaginal hysterectomy and laparoscopic hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Lee SH; Oh SR; Cho YJ; Han M; Park JW; Kim SJ; Yun JH; Choe SY; Choi JS; Bae JW
BMC Womens Health; 2019 Jun; 19(1):83. PubMed ID: 31234852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Surgical routes and complications of hysterectomy for benign disorders: a prospective observational study in French university hospitals.
David-Montefiore E; Rouzier R; Chapron C; Daraï E;
Hum Reprod; 2007 Jan; 22(1):260-5. PubMed ID: 16950826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Vaginal versus abdominal hysterectomy for the enlarged non-prolapsed uterus: a retrospective cohort study.
Fatania K; Vithayathil M; Newbold P; Yoong W
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Mar; 174():111-4. PubMed ID: 24412144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In-hospital complications of vaginal versus laparoscopic-assisted benign hysterectomy among older women: a propensity score-matched cohort study.
Lai JC; Chen HH; Huang SM; Wang KL; Huang N; Hu HY; Chou YJ
Menopause; 2016 Nov; 23(11):1233-1238. PubMed ID: 27465711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Systematic implementation of laparoscopic hysterectomy independent of uterus size: clinical effect.
Uccella S; Cromi A; Bogani G; Casarin J; Formenti G; Ghezzi F
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2013; 20(4):505-16. PubMed ID: 23870240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of total laparoscopic, vaginal and abdominal hysterectomy.
Schindlbeck C; Klauser K; Dian D; Janni W; Friese K
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2008 Apr; 277(4):331-7. PubMed ID: 17938945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Randomized comparison of total laparoscopic, laparoscopically assisted vaginal and vaginal hysterectomies for myomatous uteri.
Sesti F; Cosi V; Calonzi F; Ruggeri V; Pietropolli A; Di Francesco L; Piccione E
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 Sep; 290(3):485-91. PubMed ID: 24710800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease.
Aarts JW; Nieboer TE; Johnson N; Tavender E; Garry R; Mol BW; Kluivers KB
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Aug; 2015(8):CD003677. PubMed ID: 26264829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of robotic and other minimally invasive routes of hysterectomy for benign indications.
Swenson CW; Kamdar NS; Harris JA; Uppal S; Campbell DA; Morgan DM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):650.e1-650.e8. PubMed ID: 27343568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Laparoscopic hysterectomy and urological lesions: risk analysis based on current literature and preventive strategies].
Cipullo L; Cassese S; Fasolino L; Fasolino A
Minerva Ginecol; 2008 Aug; 60(4):331-7. PubMed ID: 18560349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. FINHYST, a prospective study of 5279 hysterectomies: complications and their risk factors.
Brummer TH; Jalkanen J; Fraser J; Heikkinen AM; Kauko M; Mäkinen J; Seppälä T; Sjöberg J; Tomás E; Härkki P
Hum Reprod; 2011 Jul; 26(7):1741-51. PubMed ID: 21540244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A prospective randomized comparison of vaginal hysterectomy, laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy, and total laparoscopic hysterectomy in women with benign uterine disease.
Drahonovsky J; Haakova L; Otcenasek M; Krofta L; Kucera E; Feyereisl J
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 Feb; 148(2):172-6. PubMed ID: 19926201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Versus Vaginal Hysterectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Sandberg EM; Twijnstra ARH; Driessen SRC; Jansen FW
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017 Feb; 24(2):206-217.e22. PubMed ID: 27867051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
