These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Letting the patient decide: the importance of autonomy when the prognosis is deeply unclear. Stewart JD Am J Bioeth; 2014; 14(7):53. PubMed ID: 24978419 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Lost in translation: the complexity of a previously expressed wish when prognosis is uncertain. Webster LB; Shirley JL Am J Bioeth; 2014; 14(7):53-5. PubMed ID: 24978418 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Moral distress caused by an uncertain prognosis: when the surrogate and the physician bring different priorities to the discussion. Gordon J Am J Bioeth; 2014; 14(7):55-6. PubMed ID: 24978420 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The Case: A Son's Refusal. McGaughey JW; Volpe RL; Jonsen A; Bustillos D; Dorman W; Stone JR Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2010 Oct; 19(4):530, 540-1; discussion 531-40. PubMed ID: 20719031 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Shattering the neutral surrogate myth in end-of-life decisionmaking: Terri Schiavo and her family. Shepherd L Cumberland Law Rev; 2004-2005; 35(3):575-95. PubMed ID: 16715563 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Ethical issues in invasive mechanical ventilation for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Hirano Y; Yamazaki Y Nurs Ethics; 2010 Jan; 17(1):51-63. PubMed ID: 20089625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Commentary: the need for more questions. Mendola A Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2014 Jan; 23(1):111-3. PubMed ID: 24229509 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Optimizing patient autonomy in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: inclusive decision-making in multidisciplinary care. Hogden A Neurodegener Dis Manag; 2014; 4(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 24640972 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The armchair ethicist: it's all about location. Diekema DS J Clin Ethics; 2007; 18(3):227-32, discussion 233-4. PubMed ID: 18051939 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. What would Terri want? On the psychological challenges of surrogate decision making. Ditto PH Death Stud; 2006 Mar; 30(2):135-48. PubMed ID: 16404818 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Missing the point: comments on the case presented by Barbara Edwards Commentary: the many styles of clinical ethics. O'Connell LJ; Yeide H J Clin Ethics; 1990; 1(1):82-4. PubMed ID: 11642824 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. When I lay my burden down: commentary on Berger. Derse AR J Clin Ethics; 2009; 20(2):172-4. PubMed ID: 19554825 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Brain trauma and surrogate decision making: dogmas, challenges, and response. Nelson JL; Frader J J Clin Ethics; 2004; 15(4):264-76. PubMed ID: 15830555 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and assisted ventilation: how patients decide. Lemoignan J; Ells C Palliat Support Care; 2010 Jun; 8(2):207-13. PubMed ID: 20557668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Autonomy and the family as (in)appropriate surrogates for DNR decisions: a qualitative analysis of dying cancer patients' talk. Eliott J; Olver I J Clin Ethics; 2007; 18(3):206-18. PubMed ID: 18051937 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Bioethics and the law: the case of Helga Wanglie: a clash at the bedside -- medically futile treatment v. patient autonomy. Blake DC; Maldonado L; Meinhardt RA Whittier Law Rev; 1993; 14():119-44. PubMed ID: 11652671 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]