These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24979358)

  • 1. Pros and cons of maternal cervical length screening to identify women at risk of spontaneous preterm delivery.
    Parry S; Elovitz MA
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Sep; 57(3):537-46. PubMed ID: 24979358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Universal maternal cervical length screening during the second trimester: pros and cons of a strategy to identify women at risk of spontaneous preterm delivery.
    Parry S; Simhan H; Elovitz M; Iams J
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Aug; 207(2):101-6. PubMed ID: 22633270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cost-effectiveness of transvaginal ultrasound cervical length screening in singletons without a prior preterm birth: an update.
    Werner EF; Hamel MS; Orzechowski K; Berghella V; Thung SF
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Oct; 213(4):554.e1-6. PubMed ID: 26071914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Universal cervical-length screening to prevent preterm birth: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Werner EF; Han CS; Pettker CM; Buhimschi CS; Copel JA; Funai EF; Thung SF
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Jul; 38(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 21157771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Not transabdominal!
    Khalifeh A; Berghella V
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Dec; 215(6):739-744.e1. PubMed ID: 27889000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cost-effectiveness of transabdominal ultrasound for cervical length screening for preterm birth prevention.
    Miller ES; Grobman WA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Dec; 209(6):546.e1-6. PubMed ID: 23954533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Treatment options and recommendations to reduce preterm births in women with short cervix.
    Slager J; Lynne S
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2012 Jul; 57 Suppl 1():S12-8. PubMed ID: 22776244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Is universal screening for cervical length among singleton pregnancies with no history of preterm birth justified?].
    Rozenberg P
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2016 Dec; 45(10):1337-1345. PubMed ID: 28166925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The case for universal cervical length screening to prevent preterm birth: is it strong enough to change practice in Canada?
    Hutcheon JA; Amanda Skoll M; Eastabrook GD; Lim KI;
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2012 Dec; 34(12):1184-1187. PubMed ID: 23231802
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Revisiting the cost-effectiveness of universal cervical length screening: importance of progesterone efficacy.
    Jain S; Kilgore M; Edwards RK; Owen J
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Jul; 215(1):101.e1-7. PubMed ID: 26821336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Transabdominal ultrasound is appropriate.
    Stamilio D; Carlson LM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Dec; 215(6):739-743.e1. PubMed ID: 27888999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Universal cervical length screening for singleton pregnancies with no history of preterm delivery, or the inverse of the Pareto principle.
    Rozenberg P
    BJOG; 2017 Jun; 124(7):1038-1045. PubMed ID: 27813278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cost-effectiveness of risk-based screening for cervical length to prevent preterm birth.
    Einerson BD; Grobman WA; Miller ES
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Jul; 215(1):100.e1-7. PubMed ID: 26880732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Implementation of universal screening for preterm delivery by mid-trimester cervical-length measurement.
    Souka AP; Papastefanou I; Pilalis A; Kassanos D; Papadopoulos G
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Mar; 53(3):396-401. PubMed ID: 29536576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Screening and treatment for short cervical length in pregnancy: a physician survey in the United States.
    Martell B; DiBenedetti DB; Weiss H; Zhou X; Reynolds M; Berghella V; Hassan SS
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2018 Mar; 297(3):601-611. PubMed ID: 29270729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Early universal use of oral progesterone for prevention of preterm births in singleton pregnancy (SINPRO study): protocol of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
    Cheung KW; Seto MTY; Ng EHY
    Trials; 2020 Jan; 21(1):121. PubMed ID: 32000820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Universal cervical length screening and treatment with vaginal progesterone to prevent preterm birth: a decision and economic analysis.
    Cahill AG; Odibo AO; Caughey AB; Stamilio DM; Hassan SS; Macones GA; Romero R
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Jun; 202(6):548.e1-8. PubMed ID: 20079888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Universal cervical length screening for prediction and prevention of preterm birth.
    Berghella V
    Obstet Gynecol Surv; 2012 Oct; 67(10):653-8. PubMed ID: 23112072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Transvaginal sonographic cervical length in first and second trimesters in a low-risk population: a prospective study.
    Wulff CB; Rode L; Rosthøj S; Hoseth E; Petersen OB; Tabor A
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 May; 51(5):604-613. PubMed ID: 28639717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Is routine transvaginal cervical length measurement cost-effective in a population where the risk of spontaneous preterm birth is low?
    Crosby DA; Miletin J; Semberova J; Daly S
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2016 Dec; 95(12):1391-1395. PubMed ID: 27623283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.