196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24979602)
1. Is It Time to Centralize High-risk Cancer Care in the United States? Comparison of Outcomes of Esophagectomy Between England and the United States.
Munasinghe A; Markar SR; Mamidanna R; Darzi AW; Faiz OD; Hanna GB; Low DE
Ann Surg; 2015 Jul; 262(1):79-85. PubMed ID: 24979602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Esophageal Cancer Surgery: Spontaneous Centralization in the US Contributed to Reduce Mortality Without Causing Health Disparities.
Schlottmann F; Strassle PD; Charles AG; Patti MG
Ann Surg Oncol; 2018 Jun; 25(6):1580-1587. PubMed ID: 29349529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A decade analysis of trends and outcomes of partial versus total esophagectomy in the United States.
Jafari MD; Halabi WJ; Smith BR; Nguyen VQ; Phelan MJ; Stamos MJ; Nguyen NT
Ann Surg; 2013 Sep; 258(3):450-8. PubMed ID: 24022437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of hospital volume on clinical and economic outcomes for esophagectomy.
Kuo EY; Chang Y; Wright CD
Ann Thorac Surg; 2001 Oct; 72(4):1118-24. PubMed ID: 11603422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Outcomes of Complex Gastrointestinal Cancer Resection at US News & World Report Top-Ranked vs Non-Ranked Hospitals.
Tay E; Gambhir S; Stopenski S; Hohmann S; Smith BR; Daly S; Hinojosa MW; Nguyen NT
J Am Coll Surg; 2021 Jul; 233(1):21-27.e1. PubMed ID: 33752982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Esophagectomy outcomes at low-volume hospitals: the association between systems characteristics and mortality.
Funk LM; Gawande AA; Semel ME; Lipsitz SR; Berry WR; Zinner MJ; Jha AK
Ann Surg; 2011 May; 253(5):912-7. PubMed ID: 21422913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of volume on esophageal cancer resections: what constitutes acceptable resection volumes for centers of excellence?
Meguid RA; Weiss ES; Chang DC; Brock MV; Yang SC
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2009 Jan; 137(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 19154895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A hospital's annual rate of esophagectomy influences the operative mortality rate.
Patti MG; Corvera CU; Glasgow RE; Way LW
J Gastrointest Surg; 1998; 2(2):186-92. PubMed ID: 9834415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Volume-outcome relationship in surgery for esophageal malignancy: systematic review and meta-analysis 2000-2011.
Markar SR; Karthikesalingam A; Thrumurthy S; Low DE
J Gastrointest Surg; 2012 May; 16(5):1055-63. PubMed ID: 22089950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mortality after esophagectomy is heavily impacted by center volume: retrospective analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample.
Fuchs HF; Harnsberger CR; Broderick RC; Chang DC; Sandler BJ; Jacobsen GR; Bouvet M; Horgan S
Surg Endosc; 2017 Jun; 31(6):2491-2497. PubMed ID: 27660245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. High-volume versus low-volume for esophageal resections for cancer: the essential role of case-mix adjustments based on clinical data.
Wouters MW; Wijnhoven BP; Karim-Kos HE; Blaauwgeers HG; Stassen LP; Steup WH; Tilanus HW; Tollenaar RA
Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 Jan; 15(1):80-7. PubMed ID: 18004627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Do the 2018 Leapfrog Group Minimal Hospital and Surgeon Volume Thresholds for Esophagectomy Favor Specific Patient Demographics?
Clark JM; Cooke DT; Hashimi H; Chin D; Utter GH; Brown LM; Nuño M
Ann Surg; 2021 Sep; 274(3):e220-e229. PubMed ID: 31425294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of operative volume on morbidity, mortality, and hospital use after esophagectomy for cancer.
Swisher SG; Deford L; Merriman KW; Walsh GL; Smythe R; Vaporicyan A; Ajani JA; Brown T; Komaki R; Roth JA; Putnam JB
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2000 Jun; 119(6):1126-32. PubMed ID: 10838528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Short-term outcomes following open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer in England: a population-based national study.
Mamidanna R; Bottle A; Aylin P; Faiz O; Hanna GB
Ann Surg; 2012 Feb; 255(2):197-203. PubMed ID: 22173202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of surgeon demographics and technique on outcomes after esophageal resections: a nationwide study.
Gopaldas RR; Bhamidipati CM; Dao TK; Markley JG
Ann Thorac Surg; 2013 Mar; 95(3):1064-9. PubMed ID: 23261119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Hospital volume and hospital mortality for esophagectomy.
van Lanschot JJ; Hulscher JB; Buskens CJ; Tilanus HW; ten Kate FJ; Obertop H
Cancer; 2001 Apr; 91(8):1574-8. PubMed ID: 11301408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Oesophagectomy practice and outcomes in England.
Al-Sarira AA; David G; Willmott S; Slavin JP; Deakin M; Corless DJ
Br J Surg; 2007 May; 94(5):585-91. PubMed ID: 17443856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. University hospital status and surgeon volume and risk of reoperation following surgery for esophageal cancer.
Kauppila JH; Wahlin K; Lagergren P; Lagergren J
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2018 May; 44(5):632-637. PubMed ID: 29548804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. National trends in outcomes for esophageal resection.
Dimick JB; Wainess RM; Upchurch GR; Iannettoni MD; Orringer MB
Ann Thorac Surg; 2005 Jan; 79(1):212-6; discussion 217-8. PubMed ID: 15620945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Impact of Hospital Size on National Trends and Outcomes Following Open Esophagectomy.
Hirji SA; Shah RM; Fields A; Orhurhu V; Bhulani N; White A; Mody GN; Swanson SJ
Medicina (Kaunas); 2019 Oct; 55(10):. PubMed ID: 31623325
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
