These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24979797)

  • 1. Context effects produced by question orders reveal quantum nature of human judgments.
    Wang Z; Solloway T; Shiffrin RM; Busemeyer JR
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2014 Jul; 111(26):9431-6. PubMed ID: 24979797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A quantum question order model supported by empirical tests of an a priori and precise prediction.
    Wang Z; Busemeyer JR
    Top Cogn Sci; 2013 Oct; 5(4):689-710. PubMed ID: 24027203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A quantum theory account of order effects and conjunction fallacies in political judgments.
    Yearsley JM; Trueblood JS
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Aug; 25(4):1517-1525. PubMed ID: 28879495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The rational status of quantum cognition.
    Pothos EM; Busemeyer JR; Shiffrin RM; Yearsley JM
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2017 Jul; 146(7):968-987. PubMed ID: 28447840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Surprising rationality in probability judgment: Assessing two competing models.
    Costello F; Watts P; Fisher C
    Cognition; 2018 Jan; 170():280-297. PubMed ID: 29096329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hilbert space multidimensional theory.
    Busemeyer JR; Wang Z
    Psychol Rev; 2018 Jul; 125(4):572-591. PubMed ID: 29952623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Is there a problem with quantum models of psychological measurements?
    Busemeyer J; Wang Z
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(11):e0187733. PubMed ID: 29117246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Surprisingly rational: probability theory plus noise explains biases in judgment.
    Costello F; Watts P
    Psychol Rev; 2014 Jul; 121(3):463-80. PubMed ID: 25090427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A quantum theoretical explanation for probability judgment errors.
    Busemeyer JR; Pothos EM; Franco R; Trueblood JS
    Psychol Rev; 2011 Apr; 118(2):193-218. PubMed ID: 21480739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comments on quantum probability theory.
    Sloman S
    Top Cogn Sci; 2014 Jan; 6(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 24482328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quantum modeling of common sense.
    Noori HR; Spanagel R
    Behav Brain Sci; 2013 Jun; 36(3):302. PubMed ID: 23673048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quantum Cognition.
    Pothos EM; Busemeyer JR
    Annu Rev Psychol; 2022 Jan; 73():749-778. PubMed ID: 34546804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A quantum geometric model of similarity.
    Pothos EM; Busemeyer JR; Trueblood JS
    Psychol Rev; 2013 Jul; 120(3):679-96. PubMed ID: 23915087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Primer on quantum cognition.
    Busemeyer JR; Wang Z
    Span J Psychol; 2019 Dec; 22():E53. PubMed ID: 31868156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Probability Theory Plus Noise: Descriptive Estimation and Inferential Judgment.
    Costello F; Watts P
    Top Cogn Sci; 2018 Jan; 10(1):192-208. PubMed ID: 29383882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparability effects in probability judgments.
    Pleskac TJ
    Psychol Sci; 2012 Aug; 23(8):848-54. PubMed ID: 22825358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Probability theory plus noise: Replies to Crupi and Tentori (2016) and to Nilsson, Juslin, and Winman (2016).
    Costello F; Watts P
    Psychol Rev; 2016 Jan; 123(1):112-23. PubMed ID: 26709415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantum cognition: a new theoretical approach to psychology.
    Bruza PD; Wang Z; Busemeyer JR
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2015 Jul; 19(7):383-93. PubMed ID: 26058709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The potential of using quantum theory to build models of cognition.
    Wang Z; Busemeyer JR; Atmanspacher H; Pothos EM
    Top Cogn Sci; 2013 Oct; 5(4):672-88. PubMed ID: 24027215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Why quantum probability does not explain the conjunction fallacy.
    Tentori K; Crupi V
    Behav Brain Sci; 2013 Jun; 36(3):308-10. PubMed ID: 23673055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.