These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Guidelines for surgical audit in Australia and New Zealand. Watters DA; Green AJ; van Rij A ANZ J Surg; 2006; 76(1-2):78-83. PubMed ID: 16483303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The first 1000 patients on an internet-based colorectal neoplasia database across private and public medicine in Australia: development of a binational model for the Colorectal Surgical Society of Australia and New Zealand. McMurrick PJ; Oliva K; Carne P; Reid C; Polglase A; Bell S; Farmer KC; Ranchod P Dis Colon Rectum; 2014 Feb; 57(2):167-73. PubMed ID: 24401877 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Acquisition and use of clinical data for audit and research. Wyatt J J Eval Clin Pract; 1995 Sep; 1(1):15-27. PubMed ID: 9238554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An interdistrict audit of vascular surgery. Lyons C Qual Assur Health Care; 1991; 3(4):293-302. PubMed ID: 1790329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Routine data: a resource for clinical audit? McKee M Qual Health Care; 1993 Jun; 2(2):104-11. PubMed ID: 10131630 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Quality Improvement in Vascular Surgery: The Role of Comparative Audit and Vascunet. ; Mitchell D; Venermo M; Mani K; Bjorck M; Troeng T; Debus S; Szeberin Z; Hansen AK; Beiles B; Setacci C; Bergqvist D; Menyhei G; Heller G; Danielsson G; Loftus I; Thomson I; Vogt K; Jensen L; Altreuther M; Eldrup N; Wigger P; Moreno-Carriles R; Lees T Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2015 Jan; 49(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 26347910 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Markers of data quality in computer audit: the Manchester Orthopaedic Database. Ricketts D; Newey M; Patterson M; Hitchin D; Fowler S Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1993 Nov; 75(6):393-6. PubMed ID: 8285541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A survey of surgical audit in Australia: whither clinical governance? Eno LM; Spigelman AD J Qual Clin Pract; 2000 Mar; 20(1):2-4; discussion 5. PubMed ID: 10821447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Implementing error rate checks to improve the data quality in the Victorian Audit of Surgical Mortality. Chen A; Vinluan J; Retegan C; McCahy P Comput Biol Med; 2019 Mar; 106():40-45. PubMed ID: 30677602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A critical evaluation of HIPE data. O'Callaghan A; Colgan MP; McGuigan C; Smyth F; Haider N; O'Neill S; Moore D; Madhavan P Ir Med J; 2012 Jan; 105(1):21-3. PubMed ID: 22397209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The ADIPS pilot National Diabetes in Pregnancy Audit Project. Simmons D; Cheung NW; McIntyre HD; Flack JR; Lagstrom J; Bond D; Johnson E; Wolmarans L; Wein P; Sinha AK; Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2007 Jun; 47(3):198-206. PubMed ID: 17550486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Toward robust information: data quality and inter-rater reliability in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Shiloach M; Frencher SK; Steeger JE; Rowell KS; Bartzokis K; Tomeh MG; Richards KE; Ko CY; Hall BL J Am Coll Surg; 2010 Jan; 210(1):6-16. PubMed ID: 20123325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quality assurance audits of community screening mammography practices: availability of active follow-up for data collection and outcome assessment. Brown ML; Houn F AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Oct; 163(4):825-9. PubMed ID: 8092017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluating the accuracy of data entry in a regional colorectal cancer database: implications for national audit. Kelly M; Lamah M Colorectal Dis; 2007 May; 9(4):337-9. PubMed ID: 17432986 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Data quality of the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry: a pilot audit. Gray NA; Mahadevan K; Campbell VK; Noble EP; Anstey CM Nephrology (Carlton); 2013 Oct; 18(10):665-70. PubMed ID: 23841726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]