These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

2779 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24980739)

  • 1. Clinical outcomes of three different crown systems with CAD/CAM technology.
    Batson ER; Cooper LF; Duqum I; Mendonça G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Oct; 112(4):770-7. PubMed ID: 24980739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. 3D and 2D marginal fit of pressed and CAD/CAM lithium disilicate crowns made from digital and conventional impressions.
    Anadioti E; Aquilino SA; Gratton DG; Holloway JA; Denry I; Thomas GW; Qian F
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Dec; 23(8):610-7. PubMed ID: 24995593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of the marginal fit of crowns fabricated with digital and conventional methods.
    Ng J; Ruse D; Wyatt C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):555-60. PubMed ID: 24630399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Marginal adaptation of Cerec 3 CAD/CAM composite crowns using two different finish line preparation designs.
    Akbar JH; Petrie CS; Walker MP; Williams K; Eick JD
    J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(3):155-63. PubMed ID: 16681497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of digital impression techniques on the adaption of ceramic partial crowns in vitro.
    Schaefer O; Decker M; Wittstock F; Kuepper H; Guentsch A
    J Dent; 2014 Jun; 42(6):677-83. PubMed ID: 24508541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of zirconium-oxide-based ceramic single-unit posterior fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) generated with two CAD/CAM systems compared to porcelain-fused-to-metal single-unit posterior FDPs: a 5-year clinical prospective study.
    Vigolo P; Mutinelli S
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Jun; 21(4):265-9. PubMed ID: 22339945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Marginal adaptation of zirconium dioxide copings: influence of the CAD/CAM system and the finish line design.
    Euán R; Figueras-Álvarez O; Cabratosa-Termes J; Oliver-Parra R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):155-62. PubMed ID: 24445027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Marginal and internal adaptation of ceramic crown restorations fabricated with CAD/CAM technology and the heat-press technique.
    Mously HA; Finkelman M; Zandparsa R; Hirayama H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):249-56. PubMed ID: 24795263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of ceramic restorations made with two CAD/CAM systems.
    Hamza TA; Ezzat HA; El-Hossary MM; Katamish HA; Shokry TE; Rosenstiel SF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Feb; 109(2):83-7. PubMed ID: 23395333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Computer-aided designed/computer-assisted manufactured composite resin versus ceramic single-tooth restorations: a 3-year clinical study.
    Vanoorbeek S; Vandamme K; Lijnen I; Naert I
    Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(3):223-30. PubMed ID: 20552087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An in vitro evaluation of fit of zirconium-oxide-based ceramic four-unit fixed partial dentures, generated with three different CAD/CAM systems, before and after porcelain firing cycles and after glaze cycles.
    Vigolo P; Fonzi F
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Dec; 17(8):621-6. PubMed ID: 18798783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Marginal and internal fit of metal-ceramic crowns fabricated with a new laser melting technology.
    Quante K; Ludwig K; Kern M
    Dent Mater; 2008 Oct; 24(10):1311-5. PubMed ID: 18384869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Micro-computed tomography evaluation of marginal fit of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated by using chairside CAD/CAM systems or the heat-pressing technique.
    Neves FD; Prado CJ; Prudente MS; Carneiro TA; Zancopé K; Davi LR; Mendonça G; Cooper LF; Soares CJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1134-40. PubMed ID: 24969409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of the marginal fit of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated with CAD/CAM technology by using conventional impressions and two intraoral digital scanners.
    Abdel-Azim T; Rogers K; Elathamna E; Zandinejad A; Metz M; Morton D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Oct; 114(4):554-9. PubMed ID: 26100929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An in vivo evaluation of fit of zirconium-oxide based ceramic single crowns, generated with two CAD/CAM systems, in comparison to metal ceramic single crowns.
    Biscaro L; Bonfiglioli R; Soattin M; Vigolo P
    J Prosthodont; 2013 Jan; 22(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 22946875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Marginal and Internal Fit of Conventional Metal-Ceramic and Lithium Disilicate CAD/CAM Crowns.
    Nam SJ; Yoon MJ; Kim WH; Ryu GJ; Bang MK; Huh JB
    Int J Prosthodont; 2015; 28(5):519-21. PubMed ID: 26340013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Internal fit of pressed and computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing ceramic crowns made from digital and conventional impressions.
    Anadioti E; Aquilino SA; Gratton DG; Holloway JA; Denry IL; Thomas GW; Qian F
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Apr; 113(4):304-9. PubMed ID: 25488521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of different fabrication steps on the marginal adaptation of two types of glass-infiltrated ceramic crown copings fabricated by CAD/CAM technology.
    Alghazzawi TF; Liu PR; Essig ME
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Apr; 21(3):167-72. PubMed ID: 22372838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of CAD/CAM systems and cement selection on marginal discrepancy of zirconia-based ceramic crowns.
    Martínez-Rus F; Suárez MJ; Rivera B; Pradíes G
    Am J Dent; 2012 Apr; 25(2):67-72. PubMed ID: 22779278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of marginal and internal fit of press-on-metal and conventional ceramic systems for three- and four-unit implant-supported partial fixed dental prostheses: An in vitro study.
    Bayramoğlu E; Özkan YK; Yildiz C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jul; 114(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 25858218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 139.