130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24980955)
1. Does rectal cancer height influence the oncological outcome?
Bhangu A; Rasheed S; Brown G; Tait D; Cunningham D; Tekkis P
Colorectal Dis; 2014 Oct; 16(10):801-8. PubMed ID: 24980955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Factors associated with oncologic outcomes after abdominoperineal resection compared with restorative resection for low rectal cancer: patient- and tumor-related or technical factors only?
Reshef A; Lavery I; Kiran RP
Dis Colon Rectum; 2012 Jan; 55(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 22156867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Oncological outcomes after total mesorectal excision for cure for cancer of the lower rectum: anterior vs. abdominoperineal resection.
Wibe A; Syse A; Andersen E; Tretli S; Myrvold HE; Søreide O;
Dis Colon Rectum; 2004 Jan; 47(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 14719151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Impact of Tumour Distance From the Anal Verge on Clinical Management and Outcomes in Patients Having a Curative Resection for Rectal Cancer.
Khan MAS; Ang CW; Hakeem AR; Scott N; Saunders RN; Botterill I
J Gastrointest Surg; 2017 Dec; 21(12):2056-2065. PubMed ID: 28924962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative quality of life in patients following abdominoperineal excision and low anterior resection for low rectal cancer.
How P; Stelzner S; Branagan G; Bundy K; Chandrakumaran K; Heald RJ; Moran B
Dis Colon Rectum; 2012 Apr; 55(4):400-6. PubMed ID: 22426263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: laparoscopic vs open surgery approach.
Laurent C; Paumet T; Leblanc F; Denost Q; Rullier E
Colorectal Dis; 2012 Jan; 14(1):35-41; discussion 42-3. PubMed ID: 21114752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Risk of permanent stoma after resection of rectal cancer depending on the distance between the tumour lower edge and anal verge.
Rutkowski A; Chwaliński M; Zajâc L; Nowecki ZI; Nowacki MP
Pol Przegl Chir; 2011 Nov; 83(11):588-96. PubMed ID: 22246091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Surgery for locally recurrent rectal cancer in the era of total mesorectal excision: is there still a chance for cure?
Rahbari NN; Ulrich AB; Bruckner T; Münter M; Nickles A; Contin P; Löffler T; Reissfelder C; Koch M; Büchler MW; Weitz J
Ann Surg; 2011 Mar; 253(3):522-33. PubMed ID: 21209587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Multicenter study of outcome in relation to the type of resection in rectal cancer.
Ortiz H; Wibe A; Ciga MA; Kreisler E; Garcia-Granero E; Roig JV; Biondo S;
Dis Colon Rectum; 2014 Jul; 57(7):811-22. PubMed ID: 24901681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Long-term results of rectal cancer surgery with a systematical operative approach.
Lange MM; Martz JE; Ramdeen B; Brooks V; Boachie-Adjei K; van de Velde CJ; Enker WE
Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Jun; 20(6):1806-15. PubMed ID: 23536052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) for cancer located in the lower rectum: short- and mid-term results.
Muratore A; Mellano A; Marsanic P; De Simone M
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Apr; 41(4):478-83. PubMed ID: 25633642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Patients with low rectal cancer treated by abdominoperineal excision have worse tumors and higher involved margin rates compared with patients treated by anterior resection.
Shihab OC; Brown G; Daniels IR; Heald RJ; Quirke P; Moran BJ
Dis Colon Rectum; 2010 Jan; 53(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 20010351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Oncological outcome following anastomotic leak in rectal surgery.
Espín E; Ciga MA; Pera M; Ortiz H;
Br J Surg; 2015 Mar; 102(4):416-22. PubMed ID: 25619499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of postoperative complications on long-term survival after resection for rectal cancer.
Mrak K; Eberl T; Laske A; Jagoditsch M; Fritz J; Tschmelitsch J
Dis Colon Rectum; 2013 Jan; 56(1):20-8. PubMed ID: 23222276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Immediate radical resection after local excision of rectal cancer: an oncologic compromise?
Hahnloser D; Wolff BG; Larson DW; Ping J; Nivatvongs S
Dis Colon Rectum; 2005 Mar; 48(3):429-37. PubMed ID: 15747069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Indications and outcome of pelvic exenteration for locally advanced primary and recurrent rectal cancer.
Bhangu A; Ali SM; Brown G; Nicholls RJ; Tekkis P
Ann Surg; 2014 Feb; 259(2):315-22. PubMed ID: 23478530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Acceptance of a 5-mm distal bowel resection margin for rectal cancer: is it safe?
Rutkowski A; Nowacki MP; Chwalinski M; Oledzki J; Bednarczyk M; Liszka-Dalecki P; Gornicki A; Bujko K
Colorectal Dis; 2012 Jan; 14(1):71-8. PubMed ID: 21199273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Rectal cancer: involved circumferential resection margin - a root cause analysis.
Youssef H; Collantes EC; Rashid SH; Wong LS; Baragwanath P
Colorectal Dis; 2009 Jun; 11(5):470-4. PubMed ID: 18637930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Preservation of the continence function after intersphincteric resection using a prolapsing technique in the patients with low rectal cancer and its clinical prognosis.
Dai Y; Jiang JB; Bi DS; Jin ZT; Sun JZ; Hu SY
Chin Med J (Engl); 2008 Oct; 121(20):2016-20. PubMed ID: 19080267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Long-term outcome of anastomosis leakage after curative resection for mid and low rectal cancer.
Chang SC; Lin JK; Yang SH; Jiang JK; Chen WC; Lin TC
Hepatogastroenterology; 2003; 50(54):1898-902. PubMed ID: 14696429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
