255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24983438)
1. Computed tomography radiation dose reduction: effect of different iterative reconstruction algorithms on image quality.
Willemink MJ; Takx RA; de Jong PA; Budde RP; Bleys RL; Das M; Wildberger JE; Prokop M; Buls N; de Mey J; Leiner T; Schilham AM
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2014; 38(6):815-23. PubMed ID: 24983438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Initial phantom study comparing image quality in computed tomography using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and new adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction v.
Lim K; Kwon H; Cho J; Oh J; Yoon S; Kang M; Ha D; Lee J; Kang E
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015; 39(3):443-8. PubMed ID: 25654782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reducing CT radiation dose with iterative reconstruction algorithms: the influence of scan and reconstruction parameters on image quality and CTDIvol.
Klink T; Obmann V; Heverhagen J; Stork A; Adam G; Begemann P
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Sep; 83(9):1645-54. PubMed ID: 25037931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quantitative Image Quality and Histogram-Based Evaluations of an Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm at Low-to-Ultralow Radiation Dose Levels: A Phantom Study in Chest CT.
Lee KB; Goo HW
Korean J Radiol; 2018; 19(1):119-129. PubMed ID: 29354008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparative study based on image quality and clinical task performance for CT reconstruction algorithms in radiotherapy.
Li H; Dolly S; Chen HC; Anastasio MA; Low DA; Li HH; Michalski JM; Thorstad WL; Gay H; Mutic S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 17(4):377-390. PubMed ID: 27455472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Determining the radiation dose reduction potential for coronary calcium scanning with computed tomography: an anthropomorphic phantom study comparing filtered backprojection and the adaptive iterative dose reduction algorithm for image reconstruction.
Blobel J; Mews J; Schuijf JD; Overlaet W
Invest Radiol; 2013 Dec; 48(12):857-62. PubMed ID: 23917328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique on image quality in ultra-low-dose CT.
Xu Y; He W; Chen H; Hu Z; Li J; Zhang T
Clin Radiol; 2013 Sep; 68(9):902-8. PubMed ID: 23706621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A quantitative comparison of noise reduction across five commercial (hybrid and model-based) iterative reconstruction techniques: an anthropomorphic phantom study.
Patino M; Fuentes JM; Hayano K; Kambadakone AR; Uyeda JW; Sahani DV
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Feb; 204(2):W176-83. PubMed ID: 25615778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Low-dose CT imaging of a total hip arthroplasty phantom using model-based iterative reconstruction and orthopedic metal artifact reduction.
Wellenberg RH; Boomsma MF; van Osch JA; Vlassenbroek A; Milles J; Edens MA; Streekstra GJ; Slump CH; Maas M
Skeletal Radiol; 2017 May; 46(5):623-632. PubMed ID: 28204857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Image Quality in Oncologic Chest Computerized Tomography With Iterative Reconstruction: A Phantom Study.
Jensen K; Aaløkken TM; Tingberg A; Fosse E; Martinsen AC
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2016; 40(3):351-6. PubMed ID: 27192499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. CT image quality in sinogram affirmed iterative reconstruction phantom study - is there a point of diminishing returns?
Infante JC; Liu Y; Rigsby CK
Pediatr Radiol; 2017 Mar; 47(3):333-341. PubMed ID: 27891546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Liver Phantom Study: CT Radiation Dose Reduction and Different Image Reconstruction Algorithms Affect Diagnostic Quality.
Brænne KR; Flinder LI; Almenning Martiniussen M; Jensen K; Reisse CH; Julsrud L; Martinsen AC
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2016; 40(5):735-9. PubMed ID: 27224229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ultra-low dose chest computed tomography: Effect of iterative reconstruction levels on image quality.
Afadzi M; Lysvik EK; Andersen HK; Martinsen ACT
Eur J Radiol; 2019 May; 114():62-68. PubMed ID: 31005179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Improvements to image quality using hybrid and model-based iterative reconstructions: a phantom study.
Aurumskjöld ML; Ydström K; Tingberg A; Söderberg M
Acta Radiol; 2017 Jan; 58(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 26924832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Introduction of an effective method for the optimization of CT protocols using iterative reconstruction algorithms: comparison with patient data.
Kordolaimi SD; Saradeas I; Ploussi A; Pantos I; Argentos S; Efstathopoulos EP
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Oct; 203(4):W434-9. PubMed ID: 25247973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Performance of iterative reconstruction and automated tube voltage selection on the image quality and radiation dose in abdominal CT scans.
Desai GS; Fuentes Orrego JM; Kambadakone AR; Sahani DV
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2013; 37(6):897-903. PubMed ID: 24270111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Radiation dose reduction with Sinogram Affirmed Iterative Reconstruction technique for abdominal computed tomography.
Kalra MK; Woisetschläger M; Dahlström N; Singh S; Lindblom M; Choy G; Quick P; Schmidt B; Sedlmair M; Blake MA; Persson A
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2012; 36(3):339-46. PubMed ID: 22592621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Radiation dose reduction in abdominal computed tomography during the late hepatic arterial phase using a model-based iterative reconstruction algorithm: how low can we go?
Husarik DB; Marin D; Samei E; Richard S; Chen B; Jaffe TA; Bashir MR; Nelson RC
Invest Radiol; 2012 Aug; 47(8):468-74. PubMed ID: 22717881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Objective performance assessment of five computed tomography iterative reconstruction algorithms.
Omotayo A; Elbakri I
J Xray Sci Technol; 2016 Nov; 24(6):913-930. PubMed ID: 27612054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and Veo: assessment of image quality and diagnostic performance in CT colonography at various radiation doses.
Yoon MA; Kim SH; Lee JM; Woo HS; Lee ES; Ahn SJ; Han JK
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2012; 36(5):596-601. PubMed ID: 22992612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
