238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24983514)
1. Confidence-accuracy resolution in the misinformation paradigm is influenced by the availability of source cues.
Horry R; Colton LM; Williamson P
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Sep; 151():164-73. PubMed ID: 24983514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Telling a good story: The effects of memory retrieval and context processing on eyewitness suggestibility.
LaPaglia JA; Chan JCK
PLoS One; 2019; 14(2):e0212592. PubMed ID: 30789952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of postwarning specificity on memory performance and confidence in the eyewitness misinformation paradigm.
Higham PA; Blank H; Luna K
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2017 Dec; 23(4):417-432. PubMed ID: 28816470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Protecting memory from misinformation: Warnings modulate cortical reinstatement during memory retrieval.
Karanian JM; Rabb N; Wulff AN; Torrance MG; Thomas AK; Race E
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Sep; 117(37):22771-22779. PubMed ID: 32868423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Post-event information presented in a question form eliminates the misinformation effect.
Lee YS; Chen KN
Br J Psychol; 2013 Feb; 104(1):119-29. PubMed ID: 23320446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Recalling a witnessed event increases eyewitness suggestibility: the reversed testing effect.
Chan JC; Thomas AK; Bulevich JB
Psychol Sci; 2009 Jan; 20(1):66-73. PubMed ID: 19037905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Repetition, not number of sources, increases both susceptibility to misinformation and confidence in the accuracy of eyewitnesses.
Foster JL; Huthwaite T; Yesberg JA; Garry M; Loftus EF
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 Feb; 139(2):320-6. PubMed ID: 22257711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Psychophysiological correlates of the misinformation effect.
Volz K; Leonhart R; Stark R; Vaitl D; Ambach W
Int J Psychophysiol; 2017 Jul; 117():1-9. PubMed ID: 28400245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Alcohol-induced retrograde facilitation renders witnesses of crime less suggestible to misinformation.
Gawrylowicz J; Ridley AM; Albery IP; Barnoth E; Young J
Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2017 Apr; 234(8):1267-1275. PubMed ID: 28214996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Trauma and memory: effects of post-event misinformation, retrieval order, and retention interval.
Paz-Alonso PM; Goodman GS
Memory; 2008 Jan; 16(1):58-75. PubMed ID: 17852727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The quality of false memory over time: is memory for misinformation "remembered" or "known"?
Frost P
Psychon Bull Rev; 2000 Sep; 7(3):531-6. PubMed ID: 11082861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Retrieval effort cues predict eyewitness accuracy.
Lindholm T; Jönsson FU; Liuzza MT
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2018 Dec; 24(4):534-542. PubMed ID: 30024208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. When a lie becomes the truth: the effects of self-generated misinformation on eyewitness memory.
Pickel KL
Memory; 2004 Jan; 12(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 15098618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of contextual cues in recall and recognition memory: the misinformation effect reconsidered.
Campbell JM; Edwards MS; Horswill MS; Helman S
Br J Psychol; 2007 Aug; 98(Pt 3):485-98. PubMed ID: 17705942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The medium and the message: Comparing the effectiveness of six methods of misinformation delivery in an eyewitness memory paradigm.
Greene CM; Bradshaw R; Huston C; Murphy G
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2022 Dec; 28(4):677-693. PubMed ID: 34110859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of calibration for reconstructed eye-witness memories.
Bonham AJ; González-Vallejo C
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 May; 131(1):34-52. PubMed ID: 19362279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Protective effects of testing across misinformation formats in the household scene paradigm.
Pereverseff RS; Bodner GE; Huff MJ
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Mar; 73(3):425-441. PubMed ID: 31561745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Retrieval enhances eyewitness suggestibility to misinformation in free and cued recall.
Wilford MM; Chan JC; Tuhn SJ
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2014 Mar; 20(1):81-93. PubMed ID: 24000960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Using metamemory measures and memory tests to estimate eyewitness free recall performance.
Saraiva RB; Hope L; Horselenberg R; Ost J; Sauer JD; van Koppen PJ
Memory; 2020 Jan; 28(1):94-106. PubMed ID: 31699019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. How events are reviewed matters: effects of varied focus on eyewitness suggestibility.
Lane SM; Mather M; Villa D; Morita SK
Mem Cognit; 2001 Oct; 29(7):940-7. PubMed ID: 11820753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
