These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24983514)

  • 21. How events are reviewed matters: effects of varied focus on eyewitness suggestibility.
    Lane SM; Mather M; Villa D; Morita SK
    Mem Cognit; 2001 Oct; 29(7):940-7. PubMed ID: 11820753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Why misinformation is more likely to be recognised over time: A source monitoring account.
    Frost P; Ingraham M; Wilson B
    Memory; 2002 May; 10(3):179-85. PubMed ID: 11958722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Misled subjects may know more than their performance implies.
    Zaragoza MS; Koshmider JW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1989 Mar; 15(2):246-55. PubMed ID: 2522514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Why misinformation is reported: evidence from a warning and a source-monitoring task.
    Wyler H; Oswald ME
    Memory; 2016 Nov; 24(10):1419-34. PubMed ID: 26754184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Monitoring the source monitoring.
    Luna K; Martín-Luengo B
    Cogn Process; 2013 Nov; 14(4):347-56. PubMed ID: 23553316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Children's eyewitness memory: repeating post-event misinformation reduces the distinctiveness of a witnessed event.
    Bright-Paul A; Jarrold C
    Memory; 2012; 20(8):818-35. PubMed ID: 22963045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Process versus content in eyewitness metamemory monitoring.
    Robinson MD; Johnson JT; Robertson DA
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2000 Sep; 6(3):207-21. PubMed ID: 11014053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Processing similarity does not improve metamemory: evidence against transfer-appropriate monitoring.
    Weaver CA; Kelemen WL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Nov; 29(6):1058-65. PubMed ID: 14622046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Recollection-based prospective metamemory judgments are more accurate than those based on confidence: judgments of remembering and knowing (JORKS).
    McCabe DP; Soderstrom NC
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2011 Nov; 140(4):605-21. PubMed ID: 21707208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Overcoming misinformation effects in eyewitness memory: effects of encoding time and event cues.
    Frost P; Weaver CA
    Memory; 1997 Nov; 5(6):725-40. PubMed ID: 9497909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Undoing suggestive influence on memory: the reversibility of the eyewitness misinformation effect.
    Oeberst A; Blank H
    Cognition; 2012 Nov; 125(2):141-59. PubMed ID: 22883683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Memory impairment and source misattribution in postevent misinformation experiments with short retention intervals.
    Belli RF; Lindsay DS; Gales MS; McCarthy TT
    Mem Cognit; 1994 Jan; 22(1):40-54. PubMed ID: 8035684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Delaying metamemory judgments corrects the expectancy illusion in source monitoring: The role of fluency and belief.
    Schaper ML; Bayen UJ; Hey CV
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2022 Jul; 48(7):975-1000. PubMed ID: 34726439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparing the influence of directly vs. indirectly encountered post-event misinformation on eyewitness remembering.
    Blank H; Ost J; Davies J; Jones G; Lambert K; Salmon K
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 Nov; 144(3):635-41. PubMed ID: 24184995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Misinformation effects in eyewitness memory: the presence and absence of memory impairment as a function of warning and misinformation accessibility.
    Eakin DK; Schreiber TA; Sergent-Marshall S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Sep; 29(5):813-25. PubMed ID: 14516215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Does experiencing inattentional blindness for crime influence eyewitness recall?
    Cullen HJ; Paterson HM; van Golde C
    Memory; 2022 Feb; 30(2):206-216. PubMed ID: 34783643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Eyewitness accuracy and retrieval effort: Effects of time and repetition.
    Gustafsson PU; Lindholm T; Jönsson FU
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(9):e0273455. PubMed ID: 36070290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. What versus where: Investigating how autobiographical memory retrieval differs when accessed with thematic versus spatial information.
    Sheldon S; Chu S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Sep; 70(9):1909-1921. PubMed ID: 27439143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Influences of misleading postevent information: misinformation interference and acceptance.
    Belli RF
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1989 Mar; 118(1):72-85. PubMed ID: 2522507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Anger Increases Susceptibility to Misinformation.
    Greenstein M; Franklin N
    Exp Psychol; 2020 May; 67(3):202-209. PubMed ID: 32900296
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.