These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

315 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24985490)

  • 1. Comparison of credible patients of very low intelligence and non-credible patients on neurocognitive performance validity indicators.
    Smith K; Boone K; Victor T; Miora D; Cottingham M; Ziegler E; Zeller M; Wright M
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2014; 28(6):1048-70. PubMed ID: 24985490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cross-validation of RAVLT performance validity indicators and the RAVLT/RO discriminant function in a large known groups sample.
    Boone KB; Sherman D; Mishler J; Daoud G; Cottingham M; Victor TL; Ziegler E; Zeller MA; Wright M
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2022 Nov; 36(8):2342-2360. PubMed ID: 34311662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Re-examination of the Rey Word Recognition Test.
    Bell-Sprinkel TL; Boone KB; Miora D; Cottingham M; Victor T; Ziegler E; Zeller M; Wright M
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2013; 27(3):516-27. PubMed ID: 23216255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Wait, There's a Baby in this Bath Water! Update on Quantitative and Qualitative Cut-Offs for Rey 15-Item Recall and Recognition.
    Poynter K; Boone KB; Ermshar A; Miora D; Cottingham M; Victor TL; Ziegler E; Zeller MA; Wright M
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2019 Nov; 34(8):1367-1380. PubMed ID: 30395181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The non-credible score of the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test: is it better at predicting non-credible neuropsychological test performance than the RAVLT recognition score?
    Whitney KA; Davis JJ
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2015 Mar; 30(2):130-8. PubMed ID: 25599723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Visual Association Test-Extended: a cross-sectional study of the performance validity measures.
    Meyer SR; de Jonghe JF; Schmand B; Ponds RW
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2017 May; 31(4):798-813. PubMed ID: 28156190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. CVLT-II Forced Choice Recognition Trial as an Embedded Validity Indicator: A Systematic Review of the Evidence.
    Schwartz ES; Erdodi L; Rodriguez N; Ghosh JJ; Curtain JR; Flashman LA; Roth RM
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2016 Sep; 22(8):851-8. PubMed ID: 27619108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dementia and effort test performance.
    Dean AC; Victor TL; Boone KB; Philpott LM; Hess RA
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2009 Jan; 23(1):133-52. PubMed ID: 18609332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Performance validity testing in children and adolescents: A descriptive study comparing direct and embedded measures.
    Weiss SJ; Blackwell MC; Griffith KM; Jordan LS; Culotta VP
    Appl Neuropsychol Child; 2019; 8(2):158-162. PubMed ID: 29286844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of various RAVLT scores in the detection of noncredible memory performance.
    Boone KB; Lu P; Wen J
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2005 May; 20(3):301-19. PubMed ID: 15797167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Further examination of embedded performance validity indicators for the Conners' Continuous Performance Test and Brief Test of Attention in a large outpatient clinical sample.
    Sharland MJ; Waring SC; Johnson BP; Taran AM; Rusin TA; Pattock AM; Palcher JA
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2018 Jan; 32(1):98-108. PubMed ID: 28548557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Impact of Learning and Memory on Performance Validity Tests in a Mixed Clinical Pediatric Population.
    Nayar K; Ventura LM; DeDios-Stern S; Oh A; Soble JR
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2022 Jan; 37(1):50-62. PubMed ID: 34050354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical utility of the Rey 15-Item Test, recognition trial, and error scores for detecting noncredible neuropsychological performance in a mixed clinical sample of veterans.
    Bailey KC; Soble JR; O'Rourke JJF
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2018 Jan; 32(1):119-131. PubMed ID: 28555516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Not so fast! Limitations of processing speed and working memory indices as embedded performance validity tests in a mixed neuropsychiatric sample.
    Ovsiew GP; Resch ZJ; Nayar K; Williams CP; Soble JR
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2020 Jul; 42(5):473-484. PubMed ID: 32498648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intelligence and Psychopathy Do Not Influence Malingering.
    Demakis G; Rimland C; Reeve C; Ward J
    Appl Neuropsychol Adult; 2015; 22(4):262-70. PubMed ID: 25402508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Performance on the Test of Memory Malingering is predicted by the number of errors on its first 10 items on an inpatient epilepsy monitoring unit.
    Grabyan JM; Collins RL; Alverson WA; Chen DK
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2018 Apr; 32(3):468-478. PubMed ID: 28826306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The relationship of IQ to effort test performance.
    Dean AC; Victor TL; Boone KB; Arnold G
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2008 Jul; 22(4):705-22. PubMed ID: 17853124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. They're not just little adults: The utility of adult performance validity measures in a mixed clinical pediatric sample.
    Ventura LM; DeDios-Stern S; Oh A; Soble JR
    Appl Neuropsychol Child; 2021; 10(4):297-307. PubMed ID: 31703167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cross-validation of the Dot Counting Test in a large sample of credible and non-credible patients referred for neuropsychological testing.
    McCaul C; Boone KB; Ermshar A; Cottingham M; Victor TL; Ziegler E; Zeller MA; Wright M
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2018 Aug; 32(6):1054-1067. PubMed ID: 29345192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Warrington Recognition Memory Test for words as a measure of response bias: total score and response time cutoffs developed on "real world" credible and noncredible subjects.
    Kim MS; Boone KB; Victor T; Marion SD; Amano S; Cottingham ME; Ziegler EA; Zeller MA
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2010 Feb; 25(1):60-70. PubMed ID: 19906738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.